Cargando…

Anaphylaxis across two Canadian pediatric centers: evaluating management disparities

BACKGROUND: There are no data on the percentage of visits due to anaphylaxis in the emergency department (ED), triggers, and management of anaphylaxis across different provinces in Canada. OBJECTIVE: To compare the percentage of anaphylaxis cases among all ED visits, as well as the triggers and mana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Alison YM, Enarson, Paul, Clarke, Ann E, La Vieille, Sébastien, Eisman, Harley, Chan, Edmond S, Mill, Christopher, Joseph, Lawrence, Ben-Shoshan, Moshe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5221795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28115856
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S123053
_version_ 1782492881753210880
author Lee, Alison YM
Enarson, Paul
Clarke, Ann E
La Vieille, Sébastien
Eisman, Harley
Chan, Edmond S
Mill, Christopher
Joseph, Lawrence
Ben-Shoshan, Moshe
author_facet Lee, Alison YM
Enarson, Paul
Clarke, Ann E
La Vieille, Sébastien
Eisman, Harley
Chan, Edmond S
Mill, Christopher
Joseph, Lawrence
Ben-Shoshan, Moshe
author_sort Lee, Alison YM
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are no data on the percentage of visits due to anaphylaxis in the emergency department (ED), triggers, and management of anaphylaxis across different provinces in Canada. OBJECTIVE: To compare the percentage of anaphylaxis cases among all ED visits, as well as the triggers and management of anaphylaxis between two Canadian pediatric EDs (PEDs). METHODS: As part of the Cross-Canada Anaphylaxis Registry (C-CARE), children presenting to the British Columbia Children’s Hospital (BCCH) and Montreal Children’s Hospital (MCH) EDs with anaphylaxis were recruited. Characteristics, triggers, and management of anaphylaxis were documented using a standardized data entry form. Differences in demographics, triggers, and management were determined by comparing the difference of proportions and 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Between June 2014 and June 2016, there were 346 visits due to anaphylaxis among 93,730 PED visits at the BCCH ED and 631 anaphylaxis visits among 164,669 pediatric visits at the MCH ED. In both centers, the majority of cases were triggered by food (BCCH 91.3% [88.7, 94.0], MCH 82.4% [79.7, 85.3]), of which peanuts were the most common culprit (24.7% [20.9, 29.9] and 19.0% [15.8, 22.7], respectively). Pre-hospital administration of epinephrine (BCCH 27.7% [23.2, 32.8], MCH 33.1% [29.5, 37.0]) and antihistamines (BCCH 50.6% [45.2, 56.0], MCH 47.1% [43.1, 51.0]) was similar. In-hospital management differed in terms of increased epinephrine, antihistamine, and steroid use at the BCCH (59.2% [53.9, 64.4], 59.8% [54.4, 65.0], and 60.1% [54.7, 65.3], respectively) compared to the MCH (42.2% [38.3, 46.2], 36.2% [32.5, 40.1], and 11.9% [9.5, 14.8], respectively). Despite differences in management, percentage of cases admitted to the intensive care unit was similar between the two centers. CONCLUSION: Compared to previous European and North American reports, there is a high percentage of anaphylaxis cases in two PEDs across Canada with substantial differences in hospital management practices. It is crucial to develop training programs that aim to increase epinephrine use in anaphylaxis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5221795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52217952017-01-23 Anaphylaxis across two Canadian pediatric centers: evaluating management disparities Lee, Alison YM Enarson, Paul Clarke, Ann E La Vieille, Sébastien Eisman, Harley Chan, Edmond S Mill, Christopher Joseph, Lawrence Ben-Shoshan, Moshe J Asthma Allergy Original Research BACKGROUND: There are no data on the percentage of visits due to anaphylaxis in the emergency department (ED), triggers, and management of anaphylaxis across different provinces in Canada. OBJECTIVE: To compare the percentage of anaphylaxis cases among all ED visits, as well as the triggers and management of anaphylaxis between two Canadian pediatric EDs (PEDs). METHODS: As part of the Cross-Canada Anaphylaxis Registry (C-CARE), children presenting to the British Columbia Children’s Hospital (BCCH) and Montreal Children’s Hospital (MCH) EDs with anaphylaxis were recruited. Characteristics, triggers, and management of anaphylaxis were documented using a standardized data entry form. Differences in demographics, triggers, and management were determined by comparing the difference of proportions and 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Between June 2014 and June 2016, there were 346 visits due to anaphylaxis among 93,730 PED visits at the BCCH ED and 631 anaphylaxis visits among 164,669 pediatric visits at the MCH ED. In both centers, the majority of cases were triggered by food (BCCH 91.3% [88.7, 94.0], MCH 82.4% [79.7, 85.3]), of which peanuts were the most common culprit (24.7% [20.9, 29.9] and 19.0% [15.8, 22.7], respectively). Pre-hospital administration of epinephrine (BCCH 27.7% [23.2, 32.8], MCH 33.1% [29.5, 37.0]) and antihistamines (BCCH 50.6% [45.2, 56.0], MCH 47.1% [43.1, 51.0]) was similar. In-hospital management differed in terms of increased epinephrine, antihistamine, and steroid use at the BCCH (59.2% [53.9, 64.4], 59.8% [54.4, 65.0], and 60.1% [54.7, 65.3], respectively) compared to the MCH (42.2% [38.3, 46.2], 36.2% [32.5, 40.1], and 11.9% [9.5, 14.8], respectively). Despite differences in management, percentage of cases admitted to the intensive care unit was similar between the two centers. CONCLUSION: Compared to previous European and North American reports, there is a high percentage of anaphylaxis cases in two PEDs across Canada with substantial differences in hospital management practices. It is crucial to develop training programs that aim to increase epinephrine use in anaphylaxis. Dove Medical Press 2016-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5221795/ /pubmed/28115856 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S123053 Text en © 2017 Lee et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Lee, Alison YM
Enarson, Paul
Clarke, Ann E
La Vieille, Sébastien
Eisman, Harley
Chan, Edmond S
Mill, Christopher
Joseph, Lawrence
Ben-Shoshan, Moshe
Anaphylaxis across two Canadian pediatric centers: evaluating management disparities
title Anaphylaxis across two Canadian pediatric centers: evaluating management disparities
title_full Anaphylaxis across two Canadian pediatric centers: evaluating management disparities
title_fullStr Anaphylaxis across two Canadian pediatric centers: evaluating management disparities
title_full_unstemmed Anaphylaxis across two Canadian pediatric centers: evaluating management disparities
title_short Anaphylaxis across two Canadian pediatric centers: evaluating management disparities
title_sort anaphylaxis across two canadian pediatric centers: evaluating management disparities
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5221795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28115856
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S123053
work_keys_str_mv AT leealisonym anaphylaxisacrosstwocanadianpediatriccentersevaluatingmanagementdisparities
AT enarsonpaul anaphylaxisacrosstwocanadianpediatriccentersevaluatingmanagementdisparities
AT clarkeanne anaphylaxisacrosstwocanadianpediatriccentersevaluatingmanagementdisparities
AT lavieillesebastien anaphylaxisacrosstwocanadianpediatriccentersevaluatingmanagementdisparities
AT eismanharley anaphylaxisacrosstwocanadianpediatriccentersevaluatingmanagementdisparities
AT chanedmonds anaphylaxisacrosstwocanadianpediatriccentersevaluatingmanagementdisparities
AT millchristopher anaphylaxisacrosstwocanadianpediatriccentersevaluatingmanagementdisparities
AT josephlawrence anaphylaxisacrosstwocanadianpediatriccentersevaluatingmanagementdisparities
AT benshoshanmoshe anaphylaxisacrosstwocanadianpediatriccentersevaluatingmanagementdisparities