Cargando…

Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces for the Treatment of Postamputation Neuroma Pain: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND: Originally designed for prosthetic control, regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNIs) prevent neuroma formation by providing free muscle grafts as physiological targets for peripheral nerve ingrowth. We report the first series of patients undergoing RPNI implantation for treatment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woo, Shoshana L., Kung, Theodore A., Brown, David L., Leonard, James A., Kelly, Brian M., Cederna, Paul S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5222635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28293490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001038
_version_ 1782493043136397312
author Woo, Shoshana L.
Kung, Theodore A.
Brown, David L.
Leonard, James A.
Kelly, Brian M.
Cederna, Paul S.
author_facet Woo, Shoshana L.
Kung, Theodore A.
Brown, David L.
Leonard, James A.
Kelly, Brian M.
Cederna, Paul S.
author_sort Woo, Shoshana L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Originally designed for prosthetic control, regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNIs) prevent neuroma formation by providing free muscle grafts as physiological targets for peripheral nerve ingrowth. We report the first series of patients undergoing RPNI implantation for treatment of symptomatic postamputation neuromas. METHODS: A retrospective case series of all amputees undergoing RPNI implantation for treatment of symptomatic neuromas between November 2013 and June 2015 is presented. Data were obtained via chart review and phone interviews using questions derived from the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System instruments. Statistical analyses were performed using dependent sample t tests with a significance threshold of P < 0.01. RESULTS: Forty-six RPNIs were implanted into 16 amputees for neuroma relief (3 upper extremities and 14 lower extremities). Mean age was 53.5 years (6 females and 10 males). All patients participated in postoperative phone interviews at 7.5 ± 3.4 (range: 3–15) months. Patients reported a 71% reduction in neuroma pain and a 53% reduction in phantom pain. Most patients felt satisfied or highly satisfied with RPNI surgery (75%), reporting decreased (56%) or stable (44%) levels of analgesic use. Most patients would strongly recommend RPNI surgery to a friend (88%) and would do it again if given the option (94%). Complications included delayed wound healing (n = 4) and neuroma pain at a different site (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: RPNI implantation carries a reasonable complication profile while offering a simple, effective treatment for symptomatic neuromas. Most patients report a significant reduction in neuroma and phantom pain with a high level of satisfaction. The physiological basis for preventing neuroma recurrence is an intriguing benefit to this approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5222635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52226352017-03-14 Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces for the Treatment of Postamputation Neuroma Pain: A Pilot Study Woo, Shoshana L. Kung, Theodore A. Brown, David L. Leonard, James A. Kelly, Brian M. Cederna, Paul S. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Originally designed for prosthetic control, regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNIs) prevent neuroma formation by providing free muscle grafts as physiological targets for peripheral nerve ingrowth. We report the first series of patients undergoing RPNI implantation for treatment of symptomatic postamputation neuromas. METHODS: A retrospective case series of all amputees undergoing RPNI implantation for treatment of symptomatic neuromas between November 2013 and June 2015 is presented. Data were obtained via chart review and phone interviews using questions derived from the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System instruments. Statistical analyses were performed using dependent sample t tests with a significance threshold of P < 0.01. RESULTS: Forty-six RPNIs were implanted into 16 amputees for neuroma relief (3 upper extremities and 14 lower extremities). Mean age was 53.5 years (6 females and 10 males). All patients participated in postoperative phone interviews at 7.5 ± 3.4 (range: 3–15) months. Patients reported a 71% reduction in neuroma pain and a 53% reduction in phantom pain. Most patients felt satisfied or highly satisfied with RPNI surgery (75%), reporting decreased (56%) or stable (44%) levels of analgesic use. Most patients would strongly recommend RPNI surgery to a friend (88%) and would do it again if given the option (94%). Complications included delayed wound healing (n = 4) and neuroma pain at a different site (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: RPNI implantation carries a reasonable complication profile while offering a simple, effective treatment for symptomatic neuromas. Most patients report a significant reduction in neuroma and phantom pain with a high level of satisfaction. The physiological basis for preventing neuroma recurrence is an intriguing benefit to this approach. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5222635/ /pubmed/28293490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001038 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Woo, Shoshana L.
Kung, Theodore A.
Brown, David L.
Leonard, James A.
Kelly, Brian M.
Cederna, Paul S.
Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces for the Treatment of Postamputation Neuroma Pain: A Pilot Study
title Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces for the Treatment of Postamputation Neuroma Pain: A Pilot Study
title_full Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces for the Treatment of Postamputation Neuroma Pain: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces for the Treatment of Postamputation Neuroma Pain: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces for the Treatment of Postamputation Neuroma Pain: A Pilot Study
title_short Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces for the Treatment of Postamputation Neuroma Pain: A Pilot Study
title_sort regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces for the treatment of postamputation neuroma pain: a pilot study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5222635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28293490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001038
work_keys_str_mv AT wooshoshanal regenerativeperipheralnerveinterfacesforthetreatmentofpostamputationneuromapainapilotstudy
AT kungtheodorea regenerativeperipheralnerveinterfacesforthetreatmentofpostamputationneuromapainapilotstudy
AT browndavidl regenerativeperipheralnerveinterfacesforthetreatmentofpostamputationneuromapainapilotstudy
AT leonardjamesa regenerativeperipheralnerveinterfacesforthetreatmentofpostamputationneuromapainapilotstudy
AT kellybrianm regenerativeperipheralnerveinterfacesforthetreatmentofpostamputationneuromapainapilotstudy
AT cedernapauls regenerativeperipheralnerveinterfacesforthetreatmentofpostamputationneuromapainapilotstudy