Cargando…

Is social inequality related to different patient concerns in routine oral cancer follow-up clinics?

Oral cancer has a higher incidence in the lower social strata, and these patients are less likely to engage in supportive interventions and report a poorer quality of life (QoL). The aim of this paper is to compare the Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI) responses across social groups attending routine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allen, Sarah, Lowe, Derek, Harris, Rebecca V., Brown, Steve, Rogers, Simon N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5222928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27447962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4208-x
_version_ 1782493084236382208
author Allen, Sarah
Lowe, Derek
Harris, Rebecca V.
Brown, Steve
Rogers, Simon N.
author_facet Allen, Sarah
Lowe, Derek
Harris, Rebecca V.
Brown, Steve
Rogers, Simon N.
author_sort Allen, Sarah
collection PubMed
description Oral cancer has a higher incidence in the lower social strata, and these patients are less likely to engage in supportive interventions and report a poorer quality of life (QoL). The aim of this paper is to compare the Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI) responses across social groups attending routine oral cancer follow-up clinics with particular focus on the deprivation lower quartile. The PCI package is completed by patients as part of their routine review consultation with SNR. Patients were those diagnosed between 2008 and 2012. Deprivation was stratified using the IMD 2010 from postcode. Of the 106 eligible patients, 85 % used the PCI. Just over half (54 %) were living in the most deprived quartile, with two-thirds (68 %) of males in the most deprived quartile, compared with 35 % of females (p = 0.004). In regard to number and type of PCI items selected by patients at their first PCI clinic, there were no notable differences in respect of IMD classification. The two commonest concerns were fear of recurrence (43 %) and sore mouth (43 %). The most deprived quartile reported significant problems in regard to mood (p = 0.004) and recreation (p = 0.02), and a non-significant trend (36 vs 18 %, p = 0.09) in stating their overall QoL as being less than good. It is possible to identify the concerns of patients from lower socioeconomic strata as part of routine follow-up clinics. This allows for targeted multi-professional intervention and supports to improve the outcome in this hard to reach group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5222928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52229282017-01-19 Is social inequality related to different patient concerns in routine oral cancer follow-up clinics? Allen, Sarah Lowe, Derek Harris, Rebecca V. Brown, Steve Rogers, Simon N. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Head and Neck Oral cancer has a higher incidence in the lower social strata, and these patients are less likely to engage in supportive interventions and report a poorer quality of life (QoL). The aim of this paper is to compare the Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI) responses across social groups attending routine oral cancer follow-up clinics with particular focus on the deprivation lower quartile. The PCI package is completed by patients as part of their routine review consultation with SNR. Patients were those diagnosed between 2008 and 2012. Deprivation was stratified using the IMD 2010 from postcode. Of the 106 eligible patients, 85 % used the PCI. Just over half (54 %) were living in the most deprived quartile, with two-thirds (68 %) of males in the most deprived quartile, compared with 35 % of females (p = 0.004). In regard to number and type of PCI items selected by patients at their first PCI clinic, there were no notable differences in respect of IMD classification. The two commonest concerns were fear of recurrence (43 %) and sore mouth (43 %). The most deprived quartile reported significant problems in regard to mood (p = 0.004) and recreation (p = 0.02), and a non-significant trend (36 vs 18 %, p = 0.09) in stating their overall QoL as being less than good. It is possible to identify the concerns of patients from lower socioeconomic strata as part of routine follow-up clinics. This allows for targeted multi-professional intervention and supports to improve the outcome in this hard to reach group. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-07-22 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5222928/ /pubmed/27447962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4208-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Head and Neck
Allen, Sarah
Lowe, Derek
Harris, Rebecca V.
Brown, Steve
Rogers, Simon N.
Is social inequality related to different patient concerns in routine oral cancer follow-up clinics?
title Is social inequality related to different patient concerns in routine oral cancer follow-up clinics?
title_full Is social inequality related to different patient concerns in routine oral cancer follow-up clinics?
title_fullStr Is social inequality related to different patient concerns in routine oral cancer follow-up clinics?
title_full_unstemmed Is social inequality related to different patient concerns in routine oral cancer follow-up clinics?
title_short Is social inequality related to different patient concerns in routine oral cancer follow-up clinics?
title_sort is social inequality related to different patient concerns in routine oral cancer follow-up clinics?
topic Head and Neck
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5222928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27447962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4208-x
work_keys_str_mv AT allensarah issocialinequalityrelatedtodifferentpatientconcernsinroutineoralcancerfollowupclinics
AT lowederek issocialinequalityrelatedtodifferentpatientconcernsinroutineoralcancerfollowupclinics
AT harrisrebeccav issocialinequalityrelatedtodifferentpatientconcernsinroutineoralcancerfollowupclinics
AT brownsteve issocialinequalityrelatedtodifferentpatientconcernsinroutineoralcancerfollowupclinics
AT rogerssimonn issocialinequalityrelatedtodifferentpatientconcernsinroutineoralcancerfollowupclinics