Cargando…

Three-dimensional surgical simulation improves the planning for correction of facial prognathism and asymmetry: A qualitative and quantitative study

Traditional planning method for orthognathic surgery has limitations of cephalometric analysis, especially for patients with asymmetry. The aim of this study was to assess surgical plan modification after 3-demensional (3D) simulation. The procedures were to perform traditional surgical planning, co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ho, Cheng-Ting, Lin, Hsiu-Hsia, Liou, Eric J. W., Lo, Lun-Jou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5223192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28071714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep40423
_version_ 1782493129807495168
author Ho, Cheng-Ting
Lin, Hsiu-Hsia
Liou, Eric J. W.
Lo, Lun-Jou
author_facet Ho, Cheng-Ting
Lin, Hsiu-Hsia
Liou, Eric J. W.
Lo, Lun-Jou
author_sort Ho, Cheng-Ting
collection PubMed
description Traditional planning method for orthognathic surgery has limitations of cephalometric analysis, especially for patients with asymmetry. The aim of this study was to assess surgical plan modification after 3-demensional (3D) simulation. The procedures were to perform traditional surgical planning, construction of 3D model for the initial surgical plan (P1), 3D model of altered surgical plan after simulation (P2), comparison between P1 and P2 models, surgical execution, and postoperative validation using superimposition and root-mean-square difference (RMSD) between postoperative 3D image and P2 simulation model. Surgical plan was modified after 3D simulation in 93% of the cases. Absolute linear changes of landmarks in mediolateral direction (x-axis) were significant and between 1.11 to 1.62 mm. The pitch, yaw, and roll rotation as well as ramus inclination correction also showed significant changes after the 3D planning. Yaw rotation of the maxillomandibular complex (1.88 ± 0.32°) and change of ramus inclination (3.37 ± 3.21°) were most frequently performed for correction of the facial asymmetry. Errors between the postsurgical image and 3D simulation were acceptable, with RMSD 0.63 ± 0.25 mm for the maxilla and 0.85 ± 0.41 mm for the mandible. The information from this study could be used to augment the clinical planning and surgical execution when a conventional approach is applied.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5223192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52231922017-01-17 Three-dimensional surgical simulation improves the planning for correction of facial prognathism and asymmetry: A qualitative and quantitative study Ho, Cheng-Ting Lin, Hsiu-Hsia Liou, Eric J. W. Lo, Lun-Jou Sci Rep Article Traditional planning method for orthognathic surgery has limitations of cephalometric analysis, especially for patients with asymmetry. The aim of this study was to assess surgical plan modification after 3-demensional (3D) simulation. The procedures were to perform traditional surgical planning, construction of 3D model for the initial surgical plan (P1), 3D model of altered surgical plan after simulation (P2), comparison between P1 and P2 models, surgical execution, and postoperative validation using superimposition and root-mean-square difference (RMSD) between postoperative 3D image and P2 simulation model. Surgical plan was modified after 3D simulation in 93% of the cases. Absolute linear changes of landmarks in mediolateral direction (x-axis) were significant and between 1.11 to 1.62 mm. The pitch, yaw, and roll rotation as well as ramus inclination correction also showed significant changes after the 3D planning. Yaw rotation of the maxillomandibular complex (1.88 ± 0.32°) and change of ramus inclination (3.37 ± 3.21°) were most frequently performed for correction of the facial asymmetry. Errors between the postsurgical image and 3D simulation were acceptable, with RMSD 0.63 ± 0.25 mm for the maxilla and 0.85 ± 0.41 mm for the mandible. The information from this study could be used to augment the clinical planning and surgical execution when a conventional approach is applied. Nature Publishing Group 2017-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5223192/ /pubmed/28071714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep40423 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Ho, Cheng-Ting
Lin, Hsiu-Hsia
Liou, Eric J. W.
Lo, Lun-Jou
Three-dimensional surgical simulation improves the planning for correction of facial prognathism and asymmetry: A qualitative and quantitative study
title Three-dimensional surgical simulation improves the planning for correction of facial prognathism and asymmetry: A qualitative and quantitative study
title_full Three-dimensional surgical simulation improves the planning for correction of facial prognathism and asymmetry: A qualitative and quantitative study
title_fullStr Three-dimensional surgical simulation improves the planning for correction of facial prognathism and asymmetry: A qualitative and quantitative study
title_full_unstemmed Three-dimensional surgical simulation improves the planning for correction of facial prognathism and asymmetry: A qualitative and quantitative study
title_short Three-dimensional surgical simulation improves the planning for correction of facial prognathism and asymmetry: A qualitative and quantitative study
title_sort three-dimensional surgical simulation improves the planning for correction of facial prognathism and asymmetry: a qualitative and quantitative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5223192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28071714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep40423
work_keys_str_mv AT hochengting threedimensionalsurgicalsimulationimprovestheplanningforcorrectionoffacialprognathismandasymmetryaqualitativeandquantitativestudy
AT linhsiuhsia threedimensionalsurgicalsimulationimprovestheplanningforcorrectionoffacialprognathismandasymmetryaqualitativeandquantitativestudy
AT liouericjw threedimensionalsurgicalsimulationimprovestheplanningforcorrectionoffacialprognathismandasymmetryaqualitativeandquantitativestudy
AT lolunjou threedimensionalsurgicalsimulationimprovestheplanningforcorrectionoffacialprognathismandasymmetryaqualitativeandquantitativestudy