Cargando…

New insights into the GINS complex explain the controversy between existing structural models

GINS is a key component of eukaryotic replicative forks and is composed of four subunits (Sld5, Psf1, Psf2, Psf3). To explain the discrepancy between structural data from crystallography and electron microscopy (EM), we show that GINS is a compact tetramer in solution as observed in crystal structur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carroni, Marta, De March, Matteo, Medagli, Barbara, Krastanova, Ivet, Taylor, Ian A., Amenitsch, Heinz, Araki, Hiroyuchi, Pisani, Francesca M., Patwardhan, Ardan, Onesti, Silvia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5223209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28071757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep40188
_version_ 1782493133154549760
author Carroni, Marta
De March, Matteo
Medagli, Barbara
Krastanova, Ivet
Taylor, Ian A.
Amenitsch, Heinz
Araki, Hiroyuchi
Pisani, Francesca M.
Patwardhan, Ardan
Onesti, Silvia
author_facet Carroni, Marta
De March, Matteo
Medagli, Barbara
Krastanova, Ivet
Taylor, Ian A.
Amenitsch, Heinz
Araki, Hiroyuchi
Pisani, Francesca M.
Patwardhan, Ardan
Onesti, Silvia
author_sort Carroni, Marta
collection PubMed
description GINS is a key component of eukaryotic replicative forks and is composed of four subunits (Sld5, Psf1, Psf2, Psf3). To explain the discrepancy between structural data from crystallography and electron microscopy (EM), we show that GINS is a compact tetramer in solution as observed in crystal structures, but also forms a double-tetrameric population, detectable by EM. This may represent an intermediate step towards the assembly of two replicative helicase complexes at origins, moving in opposite directions within the replication bubble. Reconstruction of the double-tetrameric form, combined with small-angle X-ray scattering data, allows the localisation of the B domain of the Psf1 subunit in the free GINS complex, which was not visible in previous studies and is essential for the formation of a functional replication fork.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5223209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52232092017-01-17 New insights into the GINS complex explain the controversy between existing structural models Carroni, Marta De March, Matteo Medagli, Barbara Krastanova, Ivet Taylor, Ian A. Amenitsch, Heinz Araki, Hiroyuchi Pisani, Francesca M. Patwardhan, Ardan Onesti, Silvia Sci Rep Article GINS is a key component of eukaryotic replicative forks and is composed of four subunits (Sld5, Psf1, Psf2, Psf3). To explain the discrepancy between structural data from crystallography and electron microscopy (EM), we show that GINS is a compact tetramer in solution as observed in crystal structures, but also forms a double-tetrameric population, detectable by EM. This may represent an intermediate step towards the assembly of two replicative helicase complexes at origins, moving in opposite directions within the replication bubble. Reconstruction of the double-tetrameric form, combined with small-angle X-ray scattering data, allows the localisation of the B domain of the Psf1 subunit in the free GINS complex, which was not visible in previous studies and is essential for the formation of a functional replication fork. Nature Publishing Group 2017-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5223209/ /pubmed/28071757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep40188 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Carroni, Marta
De March, Matteo
Medagli, Barbara
Krastanova, Ivet
Taylor, Ian A.
Amenitsch, Heinz
Araki, Hiroyuchi
Pisani, Francesca M.
Patwardhan, Ardan
Onesti, Silvia
New insights into the GINS complex explain the controversy between existing structural models
title New insights into the GINS complex explain the controversy between existing structural models
title_full New insights into the GINS complex explain the controversy between existing structural models
title_fullStr New insights into the GINS complex explain the controversy between existing structural models
title_full_unstemmed New insights into the GINS complex explain the controversy between existing structural models
title_short New insights into the GINS complex explain the controversy between existing structural models
title_sort new insights into the gins complex explain the controversy between existing structural models
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5223209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28071757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep40188
work_keys_str_mv AT carronimarta newinsightsintotheginscomplexexplainthecontroversybetweenexistingstructuralmodels
AT demarchmatteo newinsightsintotheginscomplexexplainthecontroversybetweenexistingstructuralmodels
AT medaglibarbara newinsightsintotheginscomplexexplainthecontroversybetweenexistingstructuralmodels
AT krastanovaivet newinsightsintotheginscomplexexplainthecontroversybetweenexistingstructuralmodels
AT tayloriana newinsightsintotheginscomplexexplainthecontroversybetweenexistingstructuralmodels
AT amenitschheinz newinsightsintotheginscomplexexplainthecontroversybetweenexistingstructuralmodels
AT arakihiroyuchi newinsightsintotheginscomplexexplainthecontroversybetweenexistingstructuralmodels
AT pisanifrancescam newinsightsintotheginscomplexexplainthecontroversybetweenexistingstructuralmodels
AT patwardhanardan newinsightsintotheginscomplexexplainthecontroversybetweenexistingstructuralmodels
AT onestisilvia newinsightsintotheginscomplexexplainthecontroversybetweenexistingstructuralmodels