Cargando…

Why women bleed and how they are saved: a cross-sectional study of caesarean section near-miss morbidity

BACKGROUND: Maternal deaths from ‘bleeding during and after caesarean section’ (BDACS) have increased in South Africa, and have now become the largest sub-cause of deaths from obstetric haemorrhage. The aim of this study was to describe risk factors and causes of near-miss related to BDACS and inter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maswime, S., Buchmann, E. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5223297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28068945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1182-7
_version_ 1782493140819640320
author Maswime, S.
Buchmann, E. J.
author_facet Maswime, S.
Buchmann, E. J.
author_sort Maswime, S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Maternal deaths from ‘bleeding during and after caesarean section’ (BDACS) have increased in South Africa, and have now become the largest sub-cause of deaths from obstetric haemorrhage. The aim of this study was to describe risk factors and causes of near-miss related to BDACS and interventions used to arrest haemorrhage and treat its effects. METHODS: Cross-sectional prospective study in 13 urban public hospitals in South Africa, from July to December 2014. RESULTS: There were 93 cases of near-miss related and 7 maternal deaths related to BDACS. The near-miss rate was 2.1/1000 live births, and the case fatality rate was 3.5/10 000 caesarean sections. Associated near-miss risk factors were previous caesarean section in 60% of multiparas, pre-operative anaemia (55%), abruptio placentae (20%) and placenta praevia and/or accreta (20%). Atonic uterus (43%) was the most frequent anatomical cause of bleeding for near-miss, followed by surgical trauma (29%). The median duration of the operations resulting in near-miss was 90 min, with 81% noted as difficult by the surgeon. Interventions in cases of near-miss included second-look laparotomy (46%), hysterectomy (41%), B-Lynch brace suture (9%), intensive care unit admission (32%) and red cell transfusion ≥3 units (21%). CONCLUSION: Cases from maternal near-miss from BDACS were frequently associated with pre-operative risk factors. Extensive life-saving interventions were required during and after the operations. An important factor in initiating the sequence of interventions is the realisation by the surgeon that the caesarean section is difficult, so that the progression from uneventful operation to near-miss to death can be arrested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5223297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52232972017-01-11 Why women bleed and how they are saved: a cross-sectional study of caesarean section near-miss morbidity Maswime, S. Buchmann, E. J. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Maternal deaths from ‘bleeding during and after caesarean section’ (BDACS) have increased in South Africa, and have now become the largest sub-cause of deaths from obstetric haemorrhage. The aim of this study was to describe risk factors and causes of near-miss related to BDACS and interventions used to arrest haemorrhage and treat its effects. METHODS: Cross-sectional prospective study in 13 urban public hospitals in South Africa, from July to December 2014. RESULTS: There were 93 cases of near-miss related and 7 maternal deaths related to BDACS. The near-miss rate was 2.1/1000 live births, and the case fatality rate was 3.5/10 000 caesarean sections. Associated near-miss risk factors were previous caesarean section in 60% of multiparas, pre-operative anaemia (55%), abruptio placentae (20%) and placenta praevia and/or accreta (20%). Atonic uterus (43%) was the most frequent anatomical cause of bleeding for near-miss, followed by surgical trauma (29%). The median duration of the operations resulting in near-miss was 90 min, with 81% noted as difficult by the surgeon. Interventions in cases of near-miss included second-look laparotomy (46%), hysterectomy (41%), B-Lynch brace suture (9%), intensive care unit admission (32%) and red cell transfusion ≥3 units (21%). CONCLUSION: Cases from maternal near-miss from BDACS were frequently associated with pre-operative risk factors. Extensive life-saving interventions were required during and after the operations. An important factor in initiating the sequence of interventions is the realisation by the surgeon that the caesarean section is difficult, so that the progression from uneventful operation to near-miss to death can be arrested. BioMed Central 2017-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5223297/ /pubmed/28068945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1182-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Maswime, S.
Buchmann, E. J.
Why women bleed and how they are saved: a cross-sectional study of caesarean section near-miss morbidity
title Why women bleed and how they are saved: a cross-sectional study of caesarean section near-miss morbidity
title_full Why women bleed and how they are saved: a cross-sectional study of caesarean section near-miss morbidity
title_fullStr Why women bleed and how they are saved: a cross-sectional study of caesarean section near-miss morbidity
title_full_unstemmed Why women bleed and how they are saved: a cross-sectional study of caesarean section near-miss morbidity
title_short Why women bleed and how they are saved: a cross-sectional study of caesarean section near-miss morbidity
title_sort why women bleed and how they are saved: a cross-sectional study of caesarean section near-miss morbidity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5223297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28068945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1182-7
work_keys_str_mv AT maswimes whywomenbleedandhowtheyaresavedacrosssectionalstudyofcaesareansectionnearmissmorbidity
AT buchmannej whywomenbleedandhowtheyaresavedacrosssectionalstudyofcaesareansectionnearmissmorbidity