Cargando…

Sustainability of health information systems: a three-country qualitative study in southern Africa

BACKGROUND: Health information systems are central to strong health systems. They assist with patient and program management, quality improvement, disease surveillance, and strategic use of information. Many donors have worked to improve health information systems, particularly by supporting the int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moucheraud, Corrina, Schwitters, Amee, Boudreaux, Chantelle, Giles, Denise, Kilmarx, Peter H., Ntolo, Ntolo, Bangani, Zwashe, St. Louis, Michael E, Bossert, Thomas J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5223327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28073361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1971-8
_version_ 1782493147596587008
author Moucheraud, Corrina
Schwitters, Amee
Boudreaux, Chantelle
Giles, Denise
Kilmarx, Peter H.
Ntolo, Ntolo
Bangani, Zwashe
St. Louis, Michael E
Bossert, Thomas J
author_facet Moucheraud, Corrina
Schwitters, Amee
Boudreaux, Chantelle
Giles, Denise
Kilmarx, Peter H.
Ntolo, Ntolo
Bangani, Zwashe
St. Louis, Michael E
Bossert, Thomas J
author_sort Moucheraud, Corrina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health information systems are central to strong health systems. They assist with patient and program management, quality improvement, disease surveillance, and strategic use of information. Many donors have worked to improve health information systems, particularly by supporting the introduction of electronic health information systems (EHIS), which are considered more responsive and more efficient than older, paper-based systems. As many donor-driven programs are increasing their focus on country ownership, sustainability of these investments is a key concern. This analysis explores the potential sustainability of EHIS investments in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe, originally supported by the United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). METHODS: Using a framework based on sustainability theories from the health systems literature, this analysis employs a qualitative case study methodology to highlight factors that may increase the likelihood that donor-supported initiatives will continue after the original support is modified or ends. RESULTS: Findings highlight commonalities around possible determinants of sustainability. The study found that there is great optimism about the potential for EHIS, but the perceived risks may result in hesitancy to transition completely and parallel use of paper-based systems. Full stakeholder engagement is likely to be crucial for sustainability, as well as integration with other activities within the health system and those funded by development partners. The literature suggests that a sustainable system has clearly-defined goals around which stakeholders can rally, but this has not been achieved in the systems studied. The study also found that technical resource constraints – affecting system usage, maintenance, upgrades and repairs – may limit EHIS sustainability even if these other pillars were addressed. CONCLUSIONS: The sustainability of EHIS faces many challenges, which could be addressed through systems’ technical design, stakeholder coordination, and the building of organizational capacity to maintain and enhance such systems. All of this requires time and attention, but is likely to enhance long-term outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1971-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5223327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52233272017-01-11 Sustainability of health information systems: a three-country qualitative study in southern Africa Moucheraud, Corrina Schwitters, Amee Boudreaux, Chantelle Giles, Denise Kilmarx, Peter H. Ntolo, Ntolo Bangani, Zwashe St. Louis, Michael E Bossert, Thomas J BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Health information systems are central to strong health systems. They assist with patient and program management, quality improvement, disease surveillance, and strategic use of information. Many donors have worked to improve health information systems, particularly by supporting the introduction of electronic health information systems (EHIS), which are considered more responsive and more efficient than older, paper-based systems. As many donor-driven programs are increasing their focus on country ownership, sustainability of these investments is a key concern. This analysis explores the potential sustainability of EHIS investments in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe, originally supported by the United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). METHODS: Using a framework based on sustainability theories from the health systems literature, this analysis employs a qualitative case study methodology to highlight factors that may increase the likelihood that donor-supported initiatives will continue after the original support is modified or ends. RESULTS: Findings highlight commonalities around possible determinants of sustainability. The study found that there is great optimism about the potential for EHIS, but the perceived risks may result in hesitancy to transition completely and parallel use of paper-based systems. Full stakeholder engagement is likely to be crucial for sustainability, as well as integration with other activities within the health system and those funded by development partners. The literature suggests that a sustainable system has clearly-defined goals around which stakeholders can rally, but this has not been achieved in the systems studied. The study also found that technical resource constraints – affecting system usage, maintenance, upgrades and repairs – may limit EHIS sustainability even if these other pillars were addressed. CONCLUSIONS: The sustainability of EHIS faces many challenges, which could be addressed through systems’ technical design, stakeholder coordination, and the building of organizational capacity to maintain and enhance such systems. All of this requires time and attention, but is likely to enhance long-term outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1971-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5223327/ /pubmed/28073361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1971-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Moucheraud, Corrina
Schwitters, Amee
Boudreaux, Chantelle
Giles, Denise
Kilmarx, Peter H.
Ntolo, Ntolo
Bangani, Zwashe
St. Louis, Michael E
Bossert, Thomas J
Sustainability of health information systems: a three-country qualitative study in southern Africa
title Sustainability of health information systems: a three-country qualitative study in southern Africa
title_full Sustainability of health information systems: a three-country qualitative study in southern Africa
title_fullStr Sustainability of health information systems: a three-country qualitative study in southern Africa
title_full_unstemmed Sustainability of health information systems: a three-country qualitative study in southern Africa
title_short Sustainability of health information systems: a three-country qualitative study in southern Africa
title_sort sustainability of health information systems: a three-country qualitative study in southern africa
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5223327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28073361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1971-8
work_keys_str_mv AT moucheraudcorrina sustainabilityofhealthinformationsystemsathreecountryqualitativestudyinsouthernafrica
AT schwittersamee sustainabilityofhealthinformationsystemsathreecountryqualitativestudyinsouthernafrica
AT boudreauxchantelle sustainabilityofhealthinformationsystemsathreecountryqualitativestudyinsouthernafrica
AT gilesdenise sustainabilityofhealthinformationsystemsathreecountryqualitativestudyinsouthernafrica
AT kilmarxpeterh sustainabilityofhealthinformationsystemsathreecountryqualitativestudyinsouthernafrica
AT ntolontolo sustainabilityofhealthinformationsystemsathreecountryqualitativestudyinsouthernafrica
AT banganizwashe sustainabilityofhealthinformationsystemsathreecountryqualitativestudyinsouthernafrica
AT stlouismichaele sustainabilityofhealthinformationsystemsathreecountryqualitativestudyinsouthernafrica
AT bossertthomasj sustainabilityofhealthinformationsystemsathreecountryqualitativestudyinsouthernafrica