Cargando…
Sustainability of health information systems: a three-country qualitative study in southern Africa
BACKGROUND: Health information systems are central to strong health systems. They assist with patient and program management, quality improvement, disease surveillance, and strategic use of information. Many donors have worked to improve health information systems, particularly by supporting the int...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5223327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28073361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1971-8 |
_version_ | 1782493147596587008 |
---|---|
author | Moucheraud, Corrina Schwitters, Amee Boudreaux, Chantelle Giles, Denise Kilmarx, Peter H. Ntolo, Ntolo Bangani, Zwashe St. Louis, Michael E Bossert, Thomas J |
author_facet | Moucheraud, Corrina Schwitters, Amee Boudreaux, Chantelle Giles, Denise Kilmarx, Peter H. Ntolo, Ntolo Bangani, Zwashe St. Louis, Michael E Bossert, Thomas J |
author_sort | Moucheraud, Corrina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Health information systems are central to strong health systems. They assist with patient and program management, quality improvement, disease surveillance, and strategic use of information. Many donors have worked to improve health information systems, particularly by supporting the introduction of electronic health information systems (EHIS), which are considered more responsive and more efficient than older, paper-based systems. As many donor-driven programs are increasing their focus on country ownership, sustainability of these investments is a key concern. This analysis explores the potential sustainability of EHIS investments in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe, originally supported by the United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). METHODS: Using a framework based on sustainability theories from the health systems literature, this analysis employs a qualitative case study methodology to highlight factors that may increase the likelihood that donor-supported initiatives will continue after the original support is modified or ends. RESULTS: Findings highlight commonalities around possible determinants of sustainability. The study found that there is great optimism about the potential for EHIS, but the perceived risks may result in hesitancy to transition completely and parallel use of paper-based systems. Full stakeholder engagement is likely to be crucial for sustainability, as well as integration with other activities within the health system and those funded by development partners. The literature suggests that a sustainable system has clearly-defined goals around which stakeholders can rally, but this has not been achieved in the systems studied. The study also found that technical resource constraints – affecting system usage, maintenance, upgrades and repairs – may limit EHIS sustainability even if these other pillars were addressed. CONCLUSIONS: The sustainability of EHIS faces many challenges, which could be addressed through systems’ technical design, stakeholder coordination, and the building of organizational capacity to maintain and enhance such systems. All of this requires time and attention, but is likely to enhance long-term outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1971-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5223327 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52233272017-01-11 Sustainability of health information systems: a three-country qualitative study in southern Africa Moucheraud, Corrina Schwitters, Amee Boudreaux, Chantelle Giles, Denise Kilmarx, Peter H. Ntolo, Ntolo Bangani, Zwashe St. Louis, Michael E Bossert, Thomas J BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Health information systems are central to strong health systems. They assist with patient and program management, quality improvement, disease surveillance, and strategic use of information. Many donors have worked to improve health information systems, particularly by supporting the introduction of electronic health information systems (EHIS), which are considered more responsive and more efficient than older, paper-based systems. As many donor-driven programs are increasing their focus on country ownership, sustainability of these investments is a key concern. This analysis explores the potential sustainability of EHIS investments in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe, originally supported by the United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). METHODS: Using a framework based on sustainability theories from the health systems literature, this analysis employs a qualitative case study methodology to highlight factors that may increase the likelihood that donor-supported initiatives will continue after the original support is modified or ends. RESULTS: Findings highlight commonalities around possible determinants of sustainability. The study found that there is great optimism about the potential for EHIS, but the perceived risks may result in hesitancy to transition completely and parallel use of paper-based systems. Full stakeholder engagement is likely to be crucial for sustainability, as well as integration with other activities within the health system and those funded by development partners. The literature suggests that a sustainable system has clearly-defined goals around which stakeholders can rally, but this has not been achieved in the systems studied. The study also found that technical resource constraints – affecting system usage, maintenance, upgrades and repairs – may limit EHIS sustainability even if these other pillars were addressed. CONCLUSIONS: The sustainability of EHIS faces many challenges, which could be addressed through systems’ technical design, stakeholder coordination, and the building of organizational capacity to maintain and enhance such systems. All of this requires time and attention, but is likely to enhance long-term outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1971-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5223327/ /pubmed/28073361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1971-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Moucheraud, Corrina Schwitters, Amee Boudreaux, Chantelle Giles, Denise Kilmarx, Peter H. Ntolo, Ntolo Bangani, Zwashe St. Louis, Michael E Bossert, Thomas J Sustainability of health information systems: a three-country qualitative study in southern Africa |
title | Sustainability of health information systems: a three-country qualitative study in southern Africa |
title_full | Sustainability of health information systems: a three-country qualitative study in southern Africa |
title_fullStr | Sustainability of health information systems: a three-country qualitative study in southern Africa |
title_full_unstemmed | Sustainability of health information systems: a three-country qualitative study in southern Africa |
title_short | Sustainability of health information systems: a three-country qualitative study in southern Africa |
title_sort | sustainability of health information systems: a three-country qualitative study in southern africa |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5223327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28073361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1971-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moucheraudcorrina sustainabilityofhealthinformationsystemsathreecountryqualitativestudyinsouthernafrica AT schwittersamee sustainabilityofhealthinformationsystemsathreecountryqualitativestudyinsouthernafrica AT boudreauxchantelle sustainabilityofhealthinformationsystemsathreecountryqualitativestudyinsouthernafrica AT gilesdenise sustainabilityofhealthinformationsystemsathreecountryqualitativestudyinsouthernafrica AT kilmarxpeterh sustainabilityofhealthinformationsystemsathreecountryqualitativestudyinsouthernafrica AT ntolontolo sustainabilityofhealthinformationsystemsathreecountryqualitativestudyinsouthernafrica AT banganizwashe sustainabilityofhealthinformationsystemsathreecountryqualitativestudyinsouthernafrica AT stlouismichaele sustainabilityofhealthinformationsystemsathreecountryqualitativestudyinsouthernafrica AT bossertthomasj sustainabilityofhealthinformationsystemsathreecountryqualitativestudyinsouthernafrica |