Cargando…

Combined Action Observation and Motor Imagery Neurofeedback for Modulation of Brain Activity

Motor imagery (MI) and action observation have proven to be efficacious adjuncts to traditional physiotherapy for enhancing motor recovery following stroke. Recently, researchers have used a combined approach called imagined imitation (II), where an individual watches a motor task being performed, w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Friesen, Christopher L., Bardouille, Timothy, Neyedli, Heather F., Boe, Shaun G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5223402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28119594
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00692
_version_ 1782493163866292224
author Friesen, Christopher L.
Bardouille, Timothy
Neyedli, Heather F.
Boe, Shaun G.
author_facet Friesen, Christopher L.
Bardouille, Timothy
Neyedli, Heather F.
Boe, Shaun G.
author_sort Friesen, Christopher L.
collection PubMed
description Motor imagery (MI) and action observation have proven to be efficacious adjuncts to traditional physiotherapy for enhancing motor recovery following stroke. Recently, researchers have used a combined approach called imagined imitation (II), where an individual watches a motor task being performed, while simultaneously imagining they are performing the movement. While neurofeedback (NFB) has been used extensively with MI to improve patients' ability to modulate sensorimotor activity and enhance motor recovery, the effectiveness of using NFB with II to modulate brain activity is unknown. This project tested the ability of participants to modulate sensorimotor activity during electroencephalography-based II-NFB of a complex, multi-part unilateral handshake, and whether this ability transferred to a subsequent bout of MI. Moreover, given the goal of translating findings from NFB research into practical applications, such as rehabilitation, the II-NFB system was designed with several user interface and user experience features, in an attempt to both drive user engagement and match the level of challenge to the abilities of the subjects. In particular, at easy difficulty levels the II-NFB system incentivized contralateral sensorimotor up-regulation (via event related desynchronization of the mu rhythm), while at higher difficulty levels the II-NFB system incentivized sensorimotor lateralization (i.e., both contralateral up-regulation and ipsilateral down-regulation). Thirty-two subjects, receiving real or sham NFB attended four sessions where they engaged in II-NFB training and subsequent MI. Results showed the NFB group demonstrated more bilateral sensorimotor activity during sessions 2–4 during II-NFB and subsequent MI, indicating mixed success for the implementation of this particular II-NFB system. Here we discuss our findings in the context of the design features included in the II-NFB system, highlighting limitations that should be considered in future designs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5223402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52234022017-01-24 Combined Action Observation and Motor Imagery Neurofeedback for Modulation of Brain Activity Friesen, Christopher L. Bardouille, Timothy Neyedli, Heather F. Boe, Shaun G. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Motor imagery (MI) and action observation have proven to be efficacious adjuncts to traditional physiotherapy for enhancing motor recovery following stroke. Recently, researchers have used a combined approach called imagined imitation (II), where an individual watches a motor task being performed, while simultaneously imagining they are performing the movement. While neurofeedback (NFB) has been used extensively with MI to improve patients' ability to modulate sensorimotor activity and enhance motor recovery, the effectiveness of using NFB with II to modulate brain activity is unknown. This project tested the ability of participants to modulate sensorimotor activity during electroencephalography-based II-NFB of a complex, multi-part unilateral handshake, and whether this ability transferred to a subsequent bout of MI. Moreover, given the goal of translating findings from NFB research into practical applications, such as rehabilitation, the II-NFB system was designed with several user interface and user experience features, in an attempt to both drive user engagement and match the level of challenge to the abilities of the subjects. In particular, at easy difficulty levels the II-NFB system incentivized contralateral sensorimotor up-regulation (via event related desynchronization of the mu rhythm), while at higher difficulty levels the II-NFB system incentivized sensorimotor lateralization (i.e., both contralateral up-regulation and ipsilateral down-regulation). Thirty-two subjects, receiving real or sham NFB attended four sessions where they engaged in II-NFB training and subsequent MI. Results showed the NFB group demonstrated more bilateral sensorimotor activity during sessions 2–4 during II-NFB and subsequent MI, indicating mixed success for the implementation of this particular II-NFB system. Here we discuss our findings in the context of the design features included in the II-NFB system, highlighting limitations that should be considered in future designs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5223402/ /pubmed/28119594 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00692 Text en Copyright © 2017 Friesen, Bardouille, Neyedli and Boe. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Friesen, Christopher L.
Bardouille, Timothy
Neyedli, Heather F.
Boe, Shaun G.
Combined Action Observation and Motor Imagery Neurofeedback for Modulation of Brain Activity
title Combined Action Observation and Motor Imagery Neurofeedback for Modulation of Brain Activity
title_full Combined Action Observation and Motor Imagery Neurofeedback for Modulation of Brain Activity
title_fullStr Combined Action Observation and Motor Imagery Neurofeedback for Modulation of Brain Activity
title_full_unstemmed Combined Action Observation and Motor Imagery Neurofeedback for Modulation of Brain Activity
title_short Combined Action Observation and Motor Imagery Neurofeedback for Modulation of Brain Activity
title_sort combined action observation and motor imagery neurofeedback for modulation of brain activity
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5223402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28119594
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00692
work_keys_str_mv AT friesenchristopherl combinedactionobservationandmotorimageryneurofeedbackformodulationofbrainactivity
AT bardouilletimothy combinedactionobservationandmotorimageryneurofeedbackformodulationofbrainactivity
AT neyedliheatherf combinedactionobservationandmotorimageryneurofeedbackformodulationofbrainactivity
AT boeshaung combinedactionobservationandmotorimageryneurofeedbackformodulationofbrainactivity