Cargando…

Unpacking early infant male circumcision decision-making using qualitative findings from Zimbabwe

BACKGROUND: Early infant male circumcision (EIMC) has been identified as a key HIV prevention intervention. Exploring the decision-making process for adoption of EIMC for HIV prevention among parents and other key stakeholders is critical for designing effective demand creation interventions to maxi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mavhu, Webster, Hatzold, Karin, Ncube, Getrude, Fernando, Shamiso, Mangenah, Collin, Chatora, Kumbirai, Dhlamini, Roy, Mugurungi, Owen, Ticklay, Ismail, Cowan, Frances M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5223435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28069002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12914-016-0111-1
_version_ 1782493171243024384
author Mavhu, Webster
Hatzold, Karin
Ncube, Getrude
Fernando, Shamiso
Mangenah, Collin
Chatora, Kumbirai
Dhlamini, Roy
Mugurungi, Owen
Ticklay, Ismail
Cowan, Frances M.
author_facet Mavhu, Webster
Hatzold, Karin
Ncube, Getrude
Fernando, Shamiso
Mangenah, Collin
Chatora, Kumbirai
Dhlamini, Roy
Mugurungi, Owen
Ticklay, Ismail
Cowan, Frances M.
author_sort Mavhu, Webster
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early infant male circumcision (EIMC) has been identified as a key HIV prevention intervention. Exploring the decision-making process for adoption of EIMC for HIV prevention among parents and other key stakeholders is critical for designing effective demand creation interventions to maximize uptake, roll out and impact in preventing HIV. This paper describes key players, decisions and actions involved in the EIMC decision-making process. METHODS: Two complementary qualitative studies explored hypothetical and actual acceptability of EIMC in Zimbabwe. The first study (conducted 2010) explored hypothetical acceptability of EIMC among parents and wider family through focus group discussions (FGDs, n = 24). The follow-up study (conducted 2013) explored actual acceptability of EIMC among parents through twelve in-depth interviews (IDIs), four FGDs and short telephone interviews with additional parents (n = 95). Short statements from the telephone interviews were handwritten. FGDs and IDIs were audio-recorded, transcribed and translated into English. All data were thematically coded. RESULTS: Study findings suggested that EIMC decision-making involved a discussion between the infant’s parents. Male and female participants of all age groups acknowledged that the father had the final say. However, discussions around EIMC uptake suggested that the infant’s mother could sometimes covertly influence the father's decision in the direction she favoured. Discussions also suggested that fathers who had undergone voluntary medical male circumcision were more likely to adopt EIMC for their sons, compared to their uncircumcised counterparts. Mothers-in-law/grandparents were reported to have considerable influence. Based on study findings, we describe key EIMC decision makers and attempt to illustrate alternative outcomes of their key actions and decisions around EIMC within the Zimbabwean context. CONCLUSIONS: These complementary studies identified critical players, decisions and actions involved in the EIMC decision-making process. Findings on who influences decisions regarding EIMC in the Zimbabwean context highlighted the need for EIMC demand generation interventions to target fathers, mothers, grandmothers, other family members and the wider community.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5223435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52234352017-01-11 Unpacking early infant male circumcision decision-making using qualitative findings from Zimbabwe Mavhu, Webster Hatzold, Karin Ncube, Getrude Fernando, Shamiso Mangenah, Collin Chatora, Kumbirai Dhlamini, Roy Mugurungi, Owen Ticklay, Ismail Cowan, Frances M. BMC Int Health Hum Rights Research Article BACKGROUND: Early infant male circumcision (EIMC) has been identified as a key HIV prevention intervention. Exploring the decision-making process for adoption of EIMC for HIV prevention among parents and other key stakeholders is critical for designing effective demand creation interventions to maximize uptake, roll out and impact in preventing HIV. This paper describes key players, decisions and actions involved in the EIMC decision-making process. METHODS: Two complementary qualitative studies explored hypothetical and actual acceptability of EIMC in Zimbabwe. The first study (conducted 2010) explored hypothetical acceptability of EIMC among parents and wider family through focus group discussions (FGDs, n = 24). The follow-up study (conducted 2013) explored actual acceptability of EIMC among parents through twelve in-depth interviews (IDIs), four FGDs and short telephone interviews with additional parents (n = 95). Short statements from the telephone interviews were handwritten. FGDs and IDIs were audio-recorded, transcribed and translated into English. All data were thematically coded. RESULTS: Study findings suggested that EIMC decision-making involved a discussion between the infant’s parents. Male and female participants of all age groups acknowledged that the father had the final say. However, discussions around EIMC uptake suggested that the infant’s mother could sometimes covertly influence the father's decision in the direction she favoured. Discussions also suggested that fathers who had undergone voluntary medical male circumcision were more likely to adopt EIMC for their sons, compared to their uncircumcised counterparts. Mothers-in-law/grandparents were reported to have considerable influence. Based on study findings, we describe key EIMC decision makers and attempt to illustrate alternative outcomes of their key actions and decisions around EIMC within the Zimbabwean context. CONCLUSIONS: These complementary studies identified critical players, decisions and actions involved in the EIMC decision-making process. Findings on who influences decisions regarding EIMC in the Zimbabwean context highlighted the need for EIMC demand generation interventions to target fathers, mothers, grandmothers, other family members and the wider community. BioMed Central 2017-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5223435/ /pubmed/28069002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12914-016-0111-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mavhu, Webster
Hatzold, Karin
Ncube, Getrude
Fernando, Shamiso
Mangenah, Collin
Chatora, Kumbirai
Dhlamini, Roy
Mugurungi, Owen
Ticklay, Ismail
Cowan, Frances M.
Unpacking early infant male circumcision decision-making using qualitative findings from Zimbabwe
title Unpacking early infant male circumcision decision-making using qualitative findings from Zimbabwe
title_full Unpacking early infant male circumcision decision-making using qualitative findings from Zimbabwe
title_fullStr Unpacking early infant male circumcision decision-making using qualitative findings from Zimbabwe
title_full_unstemmed Unpacking early infant male circumcision decision-making using qualitative findings from Zimbabwe
title_short Unpacking early infant male circumcision decision-making using qualitative findings from Zimbabwe
title_sort unpacking early infant male circumcision decision-making using qualitative findings from zimbabwe
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5223435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28069002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12914-016-0111-1
work_keys_str_mv AT mavhuwebster unpackingearlyinfantmalecircumcisiondecisionmakingusingqualitativefindingsfromzimbabwe
AT hatzoldkarin unpackingearlyinfantmalecircumcisiondecisionmakingusingqualitativefindingsfromzimbabwe
AT ncubegetrude unpackingearlyinfantmalecircumcisiondecisionmakingusingqualitativefindingsfromzimbabwe
AT fernandoshamiso unpackingearlyinfantmalecircumcisiondecisionmakingusingqualitativefindingsfromzimbabwe
AT mangenahcollin unpackingearlyinfantmalecircumcisiondecisionmakingusingqualitativefindingsfromzimbabwe
AT chatorakumbirai unpackingearlyinfantmalecircumcisiondecisionmakingusingqualitativefindingsfromzimbabwe
AT dhlaminiroy unpackingearlyinfantmalecircumcisiondecisionmakingusingqualitativefindingsfromzimbabwe
AT mugurungiowen unpackingearlyinfantmalecircumcisiondecisionmakingusingqualitativefindingsfromzimbabwe
AT ticklayismail unpackingearlyinfantmalecircumcisiondecisionmakingusingqualitativefindingsfromzimbabwe
AT cowanfrancesm unpackingearlyinfantmalecircumcisiondecisionmakingusingqualitativefindingsfromzimbabwe