Cargando…
Unpacking early infant male circumcision decision-making using qualitative findings from Zimbabwe
BACKGROUND: Early infant male circumcision (EIMC) has been identified as a key HIV prevention intervention. Exploring the decision-making process for adoption of EIMC for HIV prevention among parents and other key stakeholders is critical for designing effective demand creation interventions to maxi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5223435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28069002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12914-016-0111-1 |
_version_ | 1782493171243024384 |
---|---|
author | Mavhu, Webster Hatzold, Karin Ncube, Getrude Fernando, Shamiso Mangenah, Collin Chatora, Kumbirai Dhlamini, Roy Mugurungi, Owen Ticklay, Ismail Cowan, Frances M. |
author_facet | Mavhu, Webster Hatzold, Karin Ncube, Getrude Fernando, Shamiso Mangenah, Collin Chatora, Kumbirai Dhlamini, Roy Mugurungi, Owen Ticklay, Ismail Cowan, Frances M. |
author_sort | Mavhu, Webster |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Early infant male circumcision (EIMC) has been identified as a key HIV prevention intervention. Exploring the decision-making process for adoption of EIMC for HIV prevention among parents and other key stakeholders is critical for designing effective demand creation interventions to maximize uptake, roll out and impact in preventing HIV. This paper describes key players, decisions and actions involved in the EIMC decision-making process. METHODS: Two complementary qualitative studies explored hypothetical and actual acceptability of EIMC in Zimbabwe. The first study (conducted 2010) explored hypothetical acceptability of EIMC among parents and wider family through focus group discussions (FGDs, n = 24). The follow-up study (conducted 2013) explored actual acceptability of EIMC among parents through twelve in-depth interviews (IDIs), four FGDs and short telephone interviews with additional parents (n = 95). Short statements from the telephone interviews were handwritten. FGDs and IDIs were audio-recorded, transcribed and translated into English. All data were thematically coded. RESULTS: Study findings suggested that EIMC decision-making involved a discussion between the infant’s parents. Male and female participants of all age groups acknowledged that the father had the final say. However, discussions around EIMC uptake suggested that the infant’s mother could sometimes covertly influence the father's decision in the direction she favoured. Discussions also suggested that fathers who had undergone voluntary medical male circumcision were more likely to adopt EIMC for their sons, compared to their uncircumcised counterparts. Mothers-in-law/grandparents were reported to have considerable influence. Based on study findings, we describe key EIMC decision makers and attempt to illustrate alternative outcomes of their key actions and decisions around EIMC within the Zimbabwean context. CONCLUSIONS: These complementary studies identified critical players, decisions and actions involved in the EIMC decision-making process. Findings on who influences decisions regarding EIMC in the Zimbabwean context highlighted the need for EIMC demand generation interventions to target fathers, mothers, grandmothers, other family members and the wider community. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5223435 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52234352017-01-11 Unpacking early infant male circumcision decision-making using qualitative findings from Zimbabwe Mavhu, Webster Hatzold, Karin Ncube, Getrude Fernando, Shamiso Mangenah, Collin Chatora, Kumbirai Dhlamini, Roy Mugurungi, Owen Ticklay, Ismail Cowan, Frances M. BMC Int Health Hum Rights Research Article BACKGROUND: Early infant male circumcision (EIMC) has been identified as a key HIV prevention intervention. Exploring the decision-making process for adoption of EIMC for HIV prevention among parents and other key stakeholders is critical for designing effective demand creation interventions to maximize uptake, roll out and impact in preventing HIV. This paper describes key players, decisions and actions involved in the EIMC decision-making process. METHODS: Two complementary qualitative studies explored hypothetical and actual acceptability of EIMC in Zimbabwe. The first study (conducted 2010) explored hypothetical acceptability of EIMC among parents and wider family through focus group discussions (FGDs, n = 24). The follow-up study (conducted 2013) explored actual acceptability of EIMC among parents through twelve in-depth interviews (IDIs), four FGDs and short telephone interviews with additional parents (n = 95). Short statements from the telephone interviews were handwritten. FGDs and IDIs were audio-recorded, transcribed and translated into English. All data were thematically coded. RESULTS: Study findings suggested that EIMC decision-making involved a discussion between the infant’s parents. Male and female participants of all age groups acknowledged that the father had the final say. However, discussions around EIMC uptake suggested that the infant’s mother could sometimes covertly influence the father's decision in the direction she favoured. Discussions also suggested that fathers who had undergone voluntary medical male circumcision were more likely to adopt EIMC for their sons, compared to their uncircumcised counterparts. Mothers-in-law/grandparents were reported to have considerable influence. Based on study findings, we describe key EIMC decision makers and attempt to illustrate alternative outcomes of their key actions and decisions around EIMC within the Zimbabwean context. CONCLUSIONS: These complementary studies identified critical players, decisions and actions involved in the EIMC decision-making process. Findings on who influences decisions regarding EIMC in the Zimbabwean context highlighted the need for EIMC demand generation interventions to target fathers, mothers, grandmothers, other family members and the wider community. BioMed Central 2017-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5223435/ /pubmed/28069002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12914-016-0111-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mavhu, Webster Hatzold, Karin Ncube, Getrude Fernando, Shamiso Mangenah, Collin Chatora, Kumbirai Dhlamini, Roy Mugurungi, Owen Ticklay, Ismail Cowan, Frances M. Unpacking early infant male circumcision decision-making using qualitative findings from Zimbabwe |
title | Unpacking early infant male circumcision decision-making using qualitative findings from Zimbabwe |
title_full | Unpacking early infant male circumcision decision-making using qualitative findings from Zimbabwe |
title_fullStr | Unpacking early infant male circumcision decision-making using qualitative findings from Zimbabwe |
title_full_unstemmed | Unpacking early infant male circumcision decision-making using qualitative findings from Zimbabwe |
title_short | Unpacking early infant male circumcision decision-making using qualitative findings from Zimbabwe |
title_sort | unpacking early infant male circumcision decision-making using qualitative findings from zimbabwe |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5223435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28069002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12914-016-0111-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mavhuwebster unpackingearlyinfantmalecircumcisiondecisionmakingusingqualitativefindingsfromzimbabwe AT hatzoldkarin unpackingearlyinfantmalecircumcisiondecisionmakingusingqualitativefindingsfromzimbabwe AT ncubegetrude unpackingearlyinfantmalecircumcisiondecisionmakingusingqualitativefindingsfromzimbabwe AT fernandoshamiso unpackingearlyinfantmalecircumcisiondecisionmakingusingqualitativefindingsfromzimbabwe AT mangenahcollin unpackingearlyinfantmalecircumcisiondecisionmakingusingqualitativefindingsfromzimbabwe AT chatorakumbirai unpackingearlyinfantmalecircumcisiondecisionmakingusingqualitativefindingsfromzimbabwe AT dhlaminiroy unpackingearlyinfantmalecircumcisiondecisionmakingusingqualitativefindingsfromzimbabwe AT mugurungiowen unpackingearlyinfantmalecircumcisiondecisionmakingusingqualitativefindingsfromzimbabwe AT ticklayismail unpackingearlyinfantmalecircumcisiondecisionmakingusingqualitativefindingsfromzimbabwe AT cowanfrancesm unpackingearlyinfantmalecircumcisiondecisionmakingusingqualitativefindingsfromzimbabwe |