Cargando…
Measuring shear-wave speed with point shear-wave elastography and MR elastography: a phantom study
OBJECTIVES: To compare shear-wave speed (SWS) measured by ultrasound-based point shear-wave elastography (pSWE) and MR elastography (MRE) on phantoms with a known shear modulus, and to assess method validity and variability. METHODS: 5 homogeneous phantoms of different stiffnesses were made. Shear m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5223661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28057657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013925 |
_version_ | 1782493214727471104 |
---|---|
author | Kishimoto, Riwa Suga, Mikio Koyama, Atsuhisa Omatsu, Tokuhiko Tachibana, Yasuhiko Ebner, Daniel K Obata, Takayuki |
author_facet | Kishimoto, Riwa Suga, Mikio Koyama, Atsuhisa Omatsu, Tokuhiko Tachibana, Yasuhiko Ebner, Daniel K Obata, Takayuki |
author_sort | Kishimoto, Riwa |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To compare shear-wave speed (SWS) measured by ultrasound-based point shear-wave elastography (pSWE) and MR elastography (MRE) on phantoms with a known shear modulus, and to assess method validity and variability. METHODS: 5 homogeneous phantoms of different stiffnesses were made. Shear modulus was measured by a rheometer, and this value was used as the standard. 10 SWS measurements were obtained at 4 different depths with 1.0–4.5 MHz convex (4C1) and 4.0–9.0 MHz linear (9L4) transducers using pSWE. MRE was carried out once per phantom, and SWSs at 5 different depths were obtained. These SWSs were then compared with those from a rheometer using linear regression analyses. RESULTS: SWSs obtained with both pSWE as well as MRE had a strong correlation with those obtained by a rheometer (R(2)>0.97). The relative difference in SWS between the procedures was from −25.2% to 25.6% for all phantoms, and from −8.1% to 6.9% when the softest and hardest phantoms were excluded. Depth dependency was noted in the 9L4 transducer of pSWE and MRE. CONCLUSIONS: SWSs from pSWE and MRE showed a good correlation with a rheometer-determined SWS. Although based on phantom studies, SWSs obtained with these methods are not always equivalent, the measurement can be thought of as reliable and these SWSs were reasonably close to each other for the middle range of stiffness within the measurable range. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5223661 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52236612017-01-11 Measuring shear-wave speed with point shear-wave elastography and MR elastography: a phantom study Kishimoto, Riwa Suga, Mikio Koyama, Atsuhisa Omatsu, Tokuhiko Tachibana, Yasuhiko Ebner, Daniel K Obata, Takayuki BMJ Open Radiology and Imaging OBJECTIVES: To compare shear-wave speed (SWS) measured by ultrasound-based point shear-wave elastography (pSWE) and MR elastography (MRE) on phantoms with a known shear modulus, and to assess method validity and variability. METHODS: 5 homogeneous phantoms of different stiffnesses were made. Shear modulus was measured by a rheometer, and this value was used as the standard. 10 SWS measurements were obtained at 4 different depths with 1.0–4.5 MHz convex (4C1) and 4.0–9.0 MHz linear (9L4) transducers using pSWE. MRE was carried out once per phantom, and SWSs at 5 different depths were obtained. These SWSs were then compared with those from a rheometer using linear regression analyses. RESULTS: SWSs obtained with both pSWE as well as MRE had a strong correlation with those obtained by a rheometer (R(2)>0.97). The relative difference in SWS between the procedures was from −25.2% to 25.6% for all phantoms, and from −8.1% to 6.9% when the softest and hardest phantoms were excluded. Depth dependency was noted in the 9L4 transducer of pSWE and MRE. CONCLUSIONS: SWSs from pSWE and MRE showed a good correlation with a rheometer-determined SWS. Although based on phantom studies, SWSs obtained with these methods are not always equivalent, the measurement can be thought of as reliable and these SWSs were reasonably close to each other for the middle range of stiffness within the measurable range. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5223661/ /pubmed/28057657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013925 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Radiology and Imaging Kishimoto, Riwa Suga, Mikio Koyama, Atsuhisa Omatsu, Tokuhiko Tachibana, Yasuhiko Ebner, Daniel K Obata, Takayuki Measuring shear-wave speed with point shear-wave elastography and MR elastography: a phantom study |
title | Measuring shear-wave speed with point shear-wave elastography and MR elastography: a phantom study |
title_full | Measuring shear-wave speed with point shear-wave elastography and MR elastography: a phantom study |
title_fullStr | Measuring shear-wave speed with point shear-wave elastography and MR elastography: a phantom study |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring shear-wave speed with point shear-wave elastography and MR elastography: a phantom study |
title_short | Measuring shear-wave speed with point shear-wave elastography and MR elastography: a phantom study |
title_sort | measuring shear-wave speed with point shear-wave elastography and mr elastography: a phantom study |
topic | Radiology and Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5223661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28057657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013925 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kishimotoriwa measuringshearwavespeedwithpointshearwaveelastographyandmrelastographyaphantomstudy AT sugamikio measuringshearwavespeedwithpointshearwaveelastographyandmrelastographyaphantomstudy AT koyamaatsuhisa measuringshearwavespeedwithpointshearwaveelastographyandmrelastographyaphantomstudy AT omatsutokuhiko measuringshearwavespeedwithpointshearwaveelastographyandmrelastographyaphantomstudy AT tachibanayasuhiko measuringshearwavespeedwithpointshearwaveelastographyandmrelastographyaphantomstudy AT ebnerdanielk measuringshearwavespeedwithpointshearwaveelastographyandmrelastographyaphantomstudy AT obatatakayuki measuringshearwavespeedwithpointshearwaveelastographyandmrelastographyaphantomstudy |