Cargando…

Study protocol for a randomised controlled multicentre study: the Foraminotomy ACDF Cost-Effectiveness Trial (FACET) in patients with cervical radiculopathy

INTRODUCTION: Cervical radiculopathy due to discogenic or spondylotic stenosis of the neuroforamen can be surgically treated by an anterior discectomy with fusion (ACDF) or a posterior foraminotomy (FOR). Most surgeons prefer ACDF, although there are indications that FOR is as effective as ACDF, has...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Broekema, A E H, Kuijlen, J M A, Lesman-Leegte, G A T, Bartels, R H M A, van Asselt, A D I, Vroomen, P C A J, van Dijk, J M C, Reneman, M F, Soer, R, Groen, R J M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5223700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28057652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012829
_version_ 1782493223338377216
author Broekema, A E H
Kuijlen, J M A
Lesman-Leegte, G A T
Bartels, R H M A
van Asselt, A D I
Vroomen, P C A J
van Dijk, J M C
Reneman, M F
Soer, R
Groen, R J M
author_facet Broekema, A E H
Kuijlen, J M A
Lesman-Leegte, G A T
Bartels, R H M A
van Asselt, A D I
Vroomen, P C A J
van Dijk, J M C
Reneman, M F
Soer, R
Groen, R J M
author_sort Broekema, A E H
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cervical radiculopathy due to discogenic or spondylotic stenosis of the neuroforamen can be surgically treated by an anterior discectomy with fusion (ACDF) or a posterior foraminotomy (FOR). Most surgeons prefer ACDF, although there are indications that FOR is as effective as ACDF, has a lower complication rate and is less expensive. A head-to-head comparison of the 2 surgical techniques in a randomised controlled trial has not yet been performed. The study objectives of the Foraminotomy ACDF Cost-Effectiveness Trial (FACET) study are to compare clinical outcomes, complication rates and cost-effectiveness of FOR to ACDF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The FACET study is a prospective randomised controlled trial conducted in 7 medical centres in the Netherlands. The follow-up period is 2 years. The main inclusion criterion is a radiculopathy of the C4, C5, C6 or C7 nerve root, due to a single-level isolated cervical foraminal stenosis caused by a soft disc and/or osteophytic component, requiring operative decompression. A sample size of 308 patients is required to test the hypothesis of clinical non-inferiority of FOR versus ACDF. Primary outcomes are: ‘operative success’, the measured decrease in radiculopathy assessed by the visual analogue scale and ‘patient success’, assessed by the modified Odom's criteria. Secondary outcomes are: Work Ability Index (single-item WAI), quality of life (EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 level Survey, EQ-5D-5L), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and complications. An economic evaluation will assess cost-effectiveness. In addition, a budget impact analysis will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Groningen. Results of this study will be disseminated through national and international papers. The participants and relevant patient support groups will be informed about the results of the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR5536, pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5223700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52237002017-01-11 Study protocol for a randomised controlled multicentre study: the Foraminotomy ACDF Cost-Effectiveness Trial (FACET) in patients with cervical radiculopathy Broekema, A E H Kuijlen, J M A Lesman-Leegte, G A T Bartels, R H M A van Asselt, A D I Vroomen, P C A J van Dijk, J M C Reneman, M F Soer, R Groen, R J M BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Cervical radiculopathy due to discogenic or spondylotic stenosis of the neuroforamen can be surgically treated by an anterior discectomy with fusion (ACDF) or a posterior foraminotomy (FOR). Most surgeons prefer ACDF, although there are indications that FOR is as effective as ACDF, has a lower complication rate and is less expensive. A head-to-head comparison of the 2 surgical techniques in a randomised controlled trial has not yet been performed. The study objectives of the Foraminotomy ACDF Cost-Effectiveness Trial (FACET) study are to compare clinical outcomes, complication rates and cost-effectiveness of FOR to ACDF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The FACET study is a prospective randomised controlled trial conducted in 7 medical centres in the Netherlands. The follow-up period is 2 years. The main inclusion criterion is a radiculopathy of the C4, C5, C6 or C7 nerve root, due to a single-level isolated cervical foraminal stenosis caused by a soft disc and/or osteophytic component, requiring operative decompression. A sample size of 308 patients is required to test the hypothesis of clinical non-inferiority of FOR versus ACDF. Primary outcomes are: ‘operative success’, the measured decrease in radiculopathy assessed by the visual analogue scale and ‘patient success’, assessed by the modified Odom's criteria. Secondary outcomes are: Work Ability Index (single-item WAI), quality of life (EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 level Survey, EQ-5D-5L), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and complications. An economic evaluation will assess cost-effectiveness. In addition, a budget impact analysis will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Groningen. Results of this study will be disseminated through national and international papers. The participants and relevant patient support groups will be informed about the results of the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR5536, pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5223700/ /pubmed/28057652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012829 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Surgery
Broekema, A E H
Kuijlen, J M A
Lesman-Leegte, G A T
Bartels, R H M A
van Asselt, A D I
Vroomen, P C A J
van Dijk, J M C
Reneman, M F
Soer, R
Groen, R J M
Study protocol for a randomised controlled multicentre study: the Foraminotomy ACDF Cost-Effectiveness Trial (FACET) in patients with cervical radiculopathy
title Study protocol for a randomised controlled multicentre study: the Foraminotomy ACDF Cost-Effectiveness Trial (FACET) in patients with cervical radiculopathy
title_full Study protocol for a randomised controlled multicentre study: the Foraminotomy ACDF Cost-Effectiveness Trial (FACET) in patients with cervical radiculopathy
title_fullStr Study protocol for a randomised controlled multicentre study: the Foraminotomy ACDF Cost-Effectiveness Trial (FACET) in patients with cervical radiculopathy
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol for a randomised controlled multicentre study: the Foraminotomy ACDF Cost-Effectiveness Trial (FACET) in patients with cervical radiculopathy
title_short Study protocol for a randomised controlled multicentre study: the Foraminotomy ACDF Cost-Effectiveness Trial (FACET) in patients with cervical radiculopathy
title_sort study protocol for a randomised controlled multicentre study: the foraminotomy acdf cost-effectiveness trial (facet) in patients with cervical radiculopathy
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5223700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28057652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012829
work_keys_str_mv AT broekemaaeh studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledmulticentrestudytheforaminotomyacdfcosteffectivenesstrialfacetinpatientswithcervicalradiculopathy
AT kuijlenjma studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledmulticentrestudytheforaminotomyacdfcosteffectivenesstrialfacetinpatientswithcervicalradiculopathy
AT lesmanleegtegat studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledmulticentrestudytheforaminotomyacdfcosteffectivenesstrialfacetinpatientswithcervicalradiculopathy
AT bartelsrhma studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledmulticentrestudytheforaminotomyacdfcosteffectivenesstrialfacetinpatientswithcervicalradiculopathy
AT vanasseltadi studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledmulticentrestudytheforaminotomyacdfcosteffectivenesstrialfacetinpatientswithcervicalradiculopathy
AT vroomenpcaj studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledmulticentrestudytheforaminotomyacdfcosteffectivenesstrialfacetinpatientswithcervicalradiculopathy
AT vandijkjmc studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledmulticentrestudytheforaminotomyacdfcosteffectivenesstrialfacetinpatientswithcervicalradiculopathy
AT renemanmf studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledmulticentrestudytheforaminotomyacdfcosteffectivenesstrialfacetinpatientswithcervicalradiculopathy
AT soerr studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledmulticentrestudytheforaminotomyacdfcosteffectivenesstrialfacetinpatientswithcervicalradiculopathy
AT groenrjm studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledmulticentrestudytheforaminotomyacdfcosteffectivenesstrialfacetinpatientswithcervicalradiculopathy