Cargando…
The use of magnetically controlled growing rod device for pediatric scoliosis
OBJECTIVE: To study the safety and efficacy of an innovative device using distraction-based magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) for the treatment of pediatric scoliosis. METHODS: This is an evidence-based systematic review of literature for the surgical management of patients with pediatric...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Riyadh : Armed Forces Hospital
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5224406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26818162 http://dx.doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2016.1.20150266 |
_version_ | 1782493356094390272 |
---|---|
author | Figueiredo, Nicandro Kananeh, Salman F. Siqueira, Heloise H. Figueiredo, Rita C. Al Sebai, Mohamed W. |
author_facet | Figueiredo, Nicandro Kananeh, Salman F. Siqueira, Heloise H. Figueiredo, Rita C. Al Sebai, Mohamed W. |
author_sort | Figueiredo, Nicandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To study the safety and efficacy of an innovative device using distraction-based magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) for the treatment of pediatric scoliosis. METHODS: This is an evidence-based systematic review of literature for the surgical management of patients with pediatric scoliosis using MCGR technique. Six clinical studies regarding the use of MCGR were included in this review, with a total of 68 patients, and mean age of 8.38 years. The dual-rod (DR) technique of rod construct with MCGR was used in 33.85% and the single-rod (SR) in 66.15% of the patients. RESULTS: The mean preoperative main coronal curve for the DR was 65.9°, and for the SR was 69.6° (p>0.05). At the latest follow-up, it was 36.8° for DR and 43.0° for SR (p<0.05). The mean preoperative T1-S1 spinal length was 298.7 mm for the DR and 303.5 mm for the SR group (p<0.05). According to the latest follow-up, using the DR construct, the spinal length increased to 347 mm with 13.92% of total lengthening; and using the SR construct, the average lengthening was 339 mm, with 10.48% of total lengthening (p<0.05). Postoperative complications were similar, 25% in DR and 31.57% in the SR group (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Level IV of medical evidence supports the use of MCGR as a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of severe pediatric scoliosis. Recommendation Grade C supports the role of MCGR with DR construct as an option to achieve a better correction of the scoliotic curve and to maximize the postoperative T1-S1 spinal length. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5224406 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Riyadh : Armed Forces Hospital |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52244062017-01-17 The use of magnetically controlled growing rod device for pediatric scoliosis Figueiredo, Nicandro Kananeh, Salman F. Siqueira, Heloise H. Figueiredo, Rita C. Al Sebai, Mohamed W. Neurosciences (Riyadh) Systematic Review OBJECTIVE: To study the safety and efficacy of an innovative device using distraction-based magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) for the treatment of pediatric scoliosis. METHODS: This is an evidence-based systematic review of literature for the surgical management of patients with pediatric scoliosis using MCGR technique. Six clinical studies regarding the use of MCGR were included in this review, with a total of 68 patients, and mean age of 8.38 years. The dual-rod (DR) technique of rod construct with MCGR was used in 33.85% and the single-rod (SR) in 66.15% of the patients. RESULTS: The mean preoperative main coronal curve for the DR was 65.9°, and for the SR was 69.6° (p>0.05). At the latest follow-up, it was 36.8° for DR and 43.0° for SR (p<0.05). The mean preoperative T1-S1 spinal length was 298.7 mm for the DR and 303.5 mm for the SR group (p<0.05). According to the latest follow-up, using the DR construct, the spinal length increased to 347 mm with 13.92% of total lengthening; and using the SR construct, the average lengthening was 339 mm, with 10.48% of total lengthening (p<0.05). Postoperative complications were similar, 25% in DR and 31.57% in the SR group (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Level IV of medical evidence supports the use of MCGR as a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of severe pediatric scoliosis. Recommendation Grade C supports the role of MCGR with DR construct as an option to achieve a better correction of the scoliotic curve and to maximize the postoperative T1-S1 spinal length. Riyadh : Armed Forces Hospital 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5224406/ /pubmed/26818162 http://dx.doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2016.1.20150266 Text en Copyright: © Neurosciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/Neurosciences is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Figueiredo, Nicandro Kananeh, Salman F. Siqueira, Heloise H. Figueiredo, Rita C. Al Sebai, Mohamed W. The use of magnetically controlled growing rod device for pediatric scoliosis |
title | The use of magnetically controlled growing rod device for pediatric scoliosis |
title_full | The use of magnetically controlled growing rod device for pediatric scoliosis |
title_fullStr | The use of magnetically controlled growing rod device for pediatric scoliosis |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of magnetically controlled growing rod device for pediatric scoliosis |
title_short | The use of magnetically controlled growing rod device for pediatric scoliosis |
title_sort | use of magnetically controlled growing rod device for pediatric scoliosis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5224406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26818162 http://dx.doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2016.1.20150266 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT figueiredonicandro theuseofmagneticallycontrolledgrowingroddeviceforpediatricscoliosis AT kananehsalmanf theuseofmagneticallycontrolledgrowingroddeviceforpediatricscoliosis AT siqueiraheloiseh theuseofmagneticallycontrolledgrowingroddeviceforpediatricscoliosis AT figueiredoritac theuseofmagneticallycontrolledgrowingroddeviceforpediatricscoliosis AT alsebaimohamedw theuseofmagneticallycontrolledgrowingroddeviceforpediatricscoliosis AT figueiredonicandro useofmagneticallycontrolledgrowingroddeviceforpediatricscoliosis AT kananehsalmanf useofmagneticallycontrolledgrowingroddeviceforpediatricscoliosis AT siqueiraheloiseh useofmagneticallycontrolledgrowingroddeviceforpediatricscoliosis AT figueiredoritac useofmagneticallycontrolledgrowingroddeviceforpediatricscoliosis AT alsebaimohamedw useofmagneticallycontrolledgrowingroddeviceforpediatricscoliosis |