Cargando…

Alternatives to surgical approach for giant spinal schwannomas

OBJECTIVE: To review the diagnoses and surgical approach characteristics of giant spinal schwannomas (GSS) patients. METHODS: We reviewed the preoperative and postoperative radiological and clinical data, and the surgical aspects of 18 GSS patients who underwent surgery in the Department of Neurosur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Onen, Mehmet R., Simsek, Mehmet, Naderi, Sait
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Riyadh : Armed Forces Hospital 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5224408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26818164
http://dx.doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2016.1.20150242
_version_ 1782493356654329856
author Onen, Mehmet R.
Simsek, Mehmet
Naderi, Sait
author_facet Onen, Mehmet R.
Simsek, Mehmet
Naderi, Sait
author_sort Onen, Mehmet R.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To review the diagnoses and surgical approach characteristics of giant spinal schwannomas (GSS) patients. METHODS: We reviewed the preoperative and postoperative radiological and clinical data, and the surgical aspects of 18 GSS patients who underwent surgery in the Department of Neurosurgery, Umraniye Teaching Hospital and Research State Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey between January 2008 and December 2013. RESULTS: There were 15 (83.3%) female and 3 (16.6%) male patients. The age range was 16-70 years (average: 45.8). Average symptom duration was 1.5 months: (range: 1-48). There was local pain in 15 cases, and radicular pain in 6 cases. The GSSs were most frequently located in the lumbosacral area (11 cases, 61.1%). An extraforaminal surgical approach was employed in 7 cases, a posterior approach was employed in 6 cases, a combined anterior transabdominal and posterior approach was employed in 2 cases, a combined posterior and extraforaminal approach was employed in 2 cases, and a retroperitoneal approach was applied in one case. The tumors were completely excised in all cases. The mean follow-up period was 38.5 months (range: 20-68). CONCLUSION: Giant spinal schwannomas exhibit unique diagnostic and surgical factors. The selection of an appropriate approach significantly influences the success of the treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5224408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Riyadh : Armed Forces Hospital
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52244082017-01-17 Alternatives to surgical approach for giant spinal schwannomas Onen, Mehmet R. Simsek, Mehmet Naderi, Sait Neurosciences (Riyadh) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To review the diagnoses and surgical approach characteristics of giant spinal schwannomas (GSS) patients. METHODS: We reviewed the preoperative and postoperative radiological and clinical data, and the surgical aspects of 18 GSS patients who underwent surgery in the Department of Neurosurgery, Umraniye Teaching Hospital and Research State Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey between January 2008 and December 2013. RESULTS: There were 15 (83.3%) female and 3 (16.6%) male patients. The age range was 16-70 years (average: 45.8). Average symptom duration was 1.5 months: (range: 1-48). There was local pain in 15 cases, and radicular pain in 6 cases. The GSSs were most frequently located in the lumbosacral area (11 cases, 61.1%). An extraforaminal surgical approach was employed in 7 cases, a posterior approach was employed in 6 cases, a combined anterior transabdominal and posterior approach was employed in 2 cases, a combined posterior and extraforaminal approach was employed in 2 cases, and a retroperitoneal approach was applied in one case. The tumors were completely excised in all cases. The mean follow-up period was 38.5 months (range: 20-68). CONCLUSION: Giant spinal schwannomas exhibit unique diagnostic and surgical factors. The selection of an appropriate approach significantly influences the success of the treatment. Riyadh : Armed Forces Hospital 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5224408/ /pubmed/26818164 http://dx.doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2016.1.20150242 Text en Copyright: © Neurosciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/Neurosciences is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work.
spellingShingle Original Article
Onen, Mehmet R.
Simsek, Mehmet
Naderi, Sait
Alternatives to surgical approach for giant spinal schwannomas
title Alternatives to surgical approach for giant spinal schwannomas
title_full Alternatives to surgical approach for giant spinal schwannomas
title_fullStr Alternatives to surgical approach for giant spinal schwannomas
title_full_unstemmed Alternatives to surgical approach for giant spinal schwannomas
title_short Alternatives to surgical approach for giant spinal schwannomas
title_sort alternatives to surgical approach for giant spinal schwannomas
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5224408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26818164
http://dx.doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2016.1.20150242
work_keys_str_mv AT onenmehmetr alternativestosurgicalapproachforgiantspinalschwannomas
AT simsekmehmet alternativestosurgicalapproachforgiantspinalschwannomas
AT naderisait alternativestosurgicalapproachforgiantspinalschwannomas