Cargando…
Alternatives to surgical approach for giant spinal schwannomas
OBJECTIVE: To review the diagnoses and surgical approach characteristics of giant spinal schwannomas (GSS) patients. METHODS: We reviewed the preoperative and postoperative radiological and clinical data, and the surgical aspects of 18 GSS patients who underwent surgery in the Department of Neurosur...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Riyadh : Armed Forces Hospital
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5224408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26818164 http://dx.doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2016.1.20150242 |
_version_ | 1782493356654329856 |
---|---|
author | Onen, Mehmet R. Simsek, Mehmet Naderi, Sait |
author_facet | Onen, Mehmet R. Simsek, Mehmet Naderi, Sait |
author_sort | Onen, Mehmet R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To review the diagnoses and surgical approach characteristics of giant spinal schwannomas (GSS) patients. METHODS: We reviewed the preoperative and postoperative radiological and clinical data, and the surgical aspects of 18 GSS patients who underwent surgery in the Department of Neurosurgery, Umraniye Teaching Hospital and Research State Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey between January 2008 and December 2013. RESULTS: There were 15 (83.3%) female and 3 (16.6%) male patients. The age range was 16-70 years (average: 45.8). Average symptom duration was 1.5 months: (range: 1-48). There was local pain in 15 cases, and radicular pain in 6 cases. The GSSs were most frequently located in the lumbosacral area (11 cases, 61.1%). An extraforaminal surgical approach was employed in 7 cases, a posterior approach was employed in 6 cases, a combined anterior transabdominal and posterior approach was employed in 2 cases, a combined posterior and extraforaminal approach was employed in 2 cases, and a retroperitoneal approach was applied in one case. The tumors were completely excised in all cases. The mean follow-up period was 38.5 months (range: 20-68). CONCLUSION: Giant spinal schwannomas exhibit unique diagnostic and surgical factors. The selection of an appropriate approach significantly influences the success of the treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5224408 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Riyadh : Armed Forces Hospital |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52244082017-01-17 Alternatives to surgical approach for giant spinal schwannomas Onen, Mehmet R. Simsek, Mehmet Naderi, Sait Neurosciences (Riyadh) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To review the diagnoses and surgical approach characteristics of giant spinal schwannomas (GSS) patients. METHODS: We reviewed the preoperative and postoperative radiological and clinical data, and the surgical aspects of 18 GSS patients who underwent surgery in the Department of Neurosurgery, Umraniye Teaching Hospital and Research State Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey between January 2008 and December 2013. RESULTS: There were 15 (83.3%) female and 3 (16.6%) male patients. The age range was 16-70 years (average: 45.8). Average symptom duration was 1.5 months: (range: 1-48). There was local pain in 15 cases, and radicular pain in 6 cases. The GSSs were most frequently located in the lumbosacral area (11 cases, 61.1%). An extraforaminal surgical approach was employed in 7 cases, a posterior approach was employed in 6 cases, a combined anterior transabdominal and posterior approach was employed in 2 cases, a combined posterior and extraforaminal approach was employed in 2 cases, and a retroperitoneal approach was applied in one case. The tumors were completely excised in all cases. The mean follow-up period was 38.5 months (range: 20-68). CONCLUSION: Giant spinal schwannomas exhibit unique diagnostic and surgical factors. The selection of an appropriate approach significantly influences the success of the treatment. Riyadh : Armed Forces Hospital 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5224408/ /pubmed/26818164 http://dx.doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2016.1.20150242 Text en Copyright: © Neurosciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/Neurosciences is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Onen, Mehmet R. Simsek, Mehmet Naderi, Sait Alternatives to surgical approach for giant spinal schwannomas |
title | Alternatives to surgical approach for giant spinal schwannomas |
title_full | Alternatives to surgical approach for giant spinal schwannomas |
title_fullStr | Alternatives to surgical approach for giant spinal schwannomas |
title_full_unstemmed | Alternatives to surgical approach for giant spinal schwannomas |
title_short | Alternatives to surgical approach for giant spinal schwannomas |
title_sort | alternatives to surgical approach for giant spinal schwannomas |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5224408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26818164 http://dx.doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2016.1.20150242 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT onenmehmetr alternativestosurgicalapproachforgiantspinalschwannomas AT simsekmehmet alternativestosurgicalapproachforgiantspinalschwannomas AT naderisait alternativestosurgicalapproachforgiantspinalschwannomas |