Cargando…

On the Relation between the General Affective Meaning and the Basic Sublexical, Lexical, and Inter-lexical Features of Poetic Texts—A Case Study Using 57 Poems of H. M. Enzensberger

The literary genre of poetry is inherently related to the expression and elicitation of emotion via both content and form. To explore the nature of this affective impact at an extremely basic textual level, we collected ratings on eight different general affective meaning scales—valence, arousal, fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ullrich, Susann, Aryani, Arash, Kraxenberger, Maria, Jacobs, Arthur M., Conrad, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5225144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28123376
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02073
_version_ 1782493461355692032
author Ullrich, Susann
Aryani, Arash
Kraxenberger, Maria
Jacobs, Arthur M.
Conrad, Markus
author_facet Ullrich, Susann
Aryani, Arash
Kraxenberger, Maria
Jacobs, Arthur M.
Conrad, Markus
author_sort Ullrich, Susann
collection PubMed
description The literary genre of poetry is inherently related to the expression and elicitation of emotion via both content and form. To explore the nature of this affective impact at an extremely basic textual level, we collected ratings on eight different general affective meaning scales—valence, arousal, friendliness, sadness, spitefulness, poeticity, onomatopoeia, and liking—for 57 German poems (“die verteidigung der wölfe”) which the contemporary author H. M. Enzensberger had labeled as either “friendly,” “sad,” or “spiteful.” Following Jakobson's (1960) view on the vivid interplay of hierarchical text levels, we used multiple regression analyses to explore the specific influences of affective features from three different text levels (sublexical, lexical, and inter-lexical) on the perceived general affective meaning of the poems using three types of predictors: (1) Lexical predictor variables capturing the mean valence and arousal potential of words; (2) Inter-lexical predictors quantifying peaks, ranges, and dynamic changes within the lexical affective content; (3) Sublexical measures of basic affective tone according to sound-meaning correspondences at the sublexical level (see Aryani et al., 2016). We find the lexical predictors to account for a major amount of up to 50% of the variance in affective ratings. Moreover, inter-lexical and sublexical predictors account for a large portion of additional variance in the perceived general affective meaning. Together, the affective properties of all used textual features account for 43–70% of the variance in the affective ratings and still for 23–48% of the variance in the more abstract aesthetic ratings. In sum, our approach represents a novel method that successfully relates a prominent part of variance in perceived general affective meaning in this corpus of German poems to quantitative estimates of affective properties of textual components at the sublexical, lexical, and inter-lexical level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5225144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52251442017-01-25 On the Relation between the General Affective Meaning and the Basic Sublexical, Lexical, and Inter-lexical Features of Poetic Texts—A Case Study Using 57 Poems of H. M. Enzensberger Ullrich, Susann Aryani, Arash Kraxenberger, Maria Jacobs, Arthur M. Conrad, Markus Front Psychol Psychology The literary genre of poetry is inherently related to the expression and elicitation of emotion via both content and form. To explore the nature of this affective impact at an extremely basic textual level, we collected ratings on eight different general affective meaning scales—valence, arousal, friendliness, sadness, spitefulness, poeticity, onomatopoeia, and liking—for 57 German poems (“die verteidigung der wölfe”) which the contemporary author H. M. Enzensberger had labeled as either “friendly,” “sad,” or “spiteful.” Following Jakobson's (1960) view on the vivid interplay of hierarchical text levels, we used multiple regression analyses to explore the specific influences of affective features from three different text levels (sublexical, lexical, and inter-lexical) on the perceived general affective meaning of the poems using three types of predictors: (1) Lexical predictor variables capturing the mean valence and arousal potential of words; (2) Inter-lexical predictors quantifying peaks, ranges, and dynamic changes within the lexical affective content; (3) Sublexical measures of basic affective tone according to sound-meaning correspondences at the sublexical level (see Aryani et al., 2016). We find the lexical predictors to account for a major amount of up to 50% of the variance in affective ratings. Moreover, inter-lexical and sublexical predictors account for a large portion of additional variance in the perceived general affective meaning. Together, the affective properties of all used textual features account for 43–70% of the variance in the affective ratings and still for 23–48% of the variance in the more abstract aesthetic ratings. In sum, our approach represents a novel method that successfully relates a prominent part of variance in perceived general affective meaning in this corpus of German poems to quantitative estimates of affective properties of textual components at the sublexical, lexical, and inter-lexical level. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5225144/ /pubmed/28123376 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02073 Text en Copyright © 2017 Ullrich, Aryani, Kraxenberger, Jacobs and Conrad. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Ullrich, Susann
Aryani, Arash
Kraxenberger, Maria
Jacobs, Arthur M.
Conrad, Markus
On the Relation between the General Affective Meaning and the Basic Sublexical, Lexical, and Inter-lexical Features of Poetic Texts—A Case Study Using 57 Poems of H. M. Enzensberger
title On the Relation between the General Affective Meaning and the Basic Sublexical, Lexical, and Inter-lexical Features of Poetic Texts—A Case Study Using 57 Poems of H. M. Enzensberger
title_full On the Relation between the General Affective Meaning and the Basic Sublexical, Lexical, and Inter-lexical Features of Poetic Texts—A Case Study Using 57 Poems of H. M. Enzensberger
title_fullStr On the Relation between the General Affective Meaning and the Basic Sublexical, Lexical, and Inter-lexical Features of Poetic Texts—A Case Study Using 57 Poems of H. M. Enzensberger
title_full_unstemmed On the Relation between the General Affective Meaning and the Basic Sublexical, Lexical, and Inter-lexical Features of Poetic Texts—A Case Study Using 57 Poems of H. M. Enzensberger
title_short On the Relation between the General Affective Meaning and the Basic Sublexical, Lexical, and Inter-lexical Features of Poetic Texts—A Case Study Using 57 Poems of H. M. Enzensberger
title_sort on the relation between the general affective meaning and the basic sublexical, lexical, and inter-lexical features of poetic texts—a case study using 57 poems of h. m. enzensberger
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5225144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28123376
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02073
work_keys_str_mv AT ullrichsusann ontherelationbetweenthegeneralaffectivemeaningandthebasicsublexicallexicalandinterlexicalfeaturesofpoetictextsacasestudyusing57poemsofhmenzensberger
AT aryaniarash ontherelationbetweenthegeneralaffectivemeaningandthebasicsublexicallexicalandinterlexicalfeaturesofpoetictextsacasestudyusing57poemsofhmenzensberger
AT kraxenbergermaria ontherelationbetweenthegeneralaffectivemeaningandthebasicsublexicallexicalandinterlexicalfeaturesofpoetictextsacasestudyusing57poemsofhmenzensberger
AT jacobsarthurm ontherelationbetweenthegeneralaffectivemeaningandthebasicsublexicallexicalandinterlexicalfeaturesofpoetictextsacasestudyusing57poemsofhmenzensberger
AT conradmarkus ontherelationbetweenthegeneralaffectivemeaningandthebasicsublexicallexicalandinterlexicalfeaturesofpoetictextsacasestudyusing57poemsofhmenzensberger