Cargando…

The Beneficial Effects of Physical Activity: Is It Down to Your Genes? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Twin and Family Studies

BACKGROUND: There is evidence for considerable heterogeneity in the responsiveness to regular physical activity (PA) which might reflect the influence of genetic factors. The aim of this systematic review was to assess whether the response to a PA intervention for measures of body composition and ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zadro, J. R., Shirley, D., Andrade, T. B., Scurrah, K. J, Bauman, A., Ferreira, P. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5225201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28074345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-016-0073-9
_version_ 1782493472775733248
author Zadro, J. R.
Shirley, D.
Andrade, T. B.
Scurrah, K. J
Bauman, A.
Ferreira, P. H.
author_facet Zadro, J. R.
Shirley, D.
Andrade, T. B.
Scurrah, K. J
Bauman, A.
Ferreira, P. H.
author_sort Zadro, J. R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is evidence for considerable heterogeneity in the responsiveness to regular physical activity (PA) which might reflect the influence of genetic factors. The aim of this systematic review was to assess whether the response to a PA intervention for measures of body composition and cardiorespiratory fitness is (i) correlated within twin pairs and/or families and (ii) more correlated in monozygotic twins (MZ) compared to dizygotic twins (DZ), which would be consistent with genetic effects. METHODS: We performed electronic database searches, combining key words relating to “physical activity” and “genetics”, in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, SPORTS Discuss, AMED, PsycINFO, WEB OF SCIENCE, and SCOPUS from the earliest records to March 2016. Twin and family studies were included if they assessed body composition and/or cardiorespiratory fitness following a PA intervention, and provided a heritability estimate, maximal heritability estimate, or within MZ twin pair correlation (r(MZ)). Data on heritability (twin studies), maximal heritability (family studies), and the r(MZ) were extracted from included studies, although heritability estimates were not reported as small sample sizes made them uninformative. RESULTS: After screening 224 full texts, nine twin and five family studies were included in this review. The pooled r(MZ) in response to PA was significant for body mass index (r(MZ) = 0.69, n = 58), fat mass (r(MZ) = 0.58, n = 48), body fat percentage (r(MZ) = 0.55, n = 72), waist circumference (r(MZ) = 0.50, n = 27), and VO(2)max (r(MZ) = 0.39, n = 48), where “n” represents the total number of twin pairs from all studies. Maximal heritability estimates ranged from 0–21% for measures of body composition, and 22–57% for cardiorespiratory fitness. Twin studies differed in sample age, baseline values, and PA intervention, although the exclusion of any one study did not affect the results. CONCLUSIONS: Shared familial factors, including genetics, are likely to be a significant contributor to the response of body composition and cardiorespiratory fitness following PA. Genetic factors may explain individual variation in the response to PA. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: PROSPERO Registration No CRD42015020056. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40798-016-0073-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5225201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52252012017-01-24 The Beneficial Effects of Physical Activity: Is It Down to Your Genes? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Twin and Family Studies Zadro, J. R. Shirley, D. Andrade, T. B. Scurrah, K. J Bauman, A. Ferreira, P. H. Sports Med Open Systematic Review BACKGROUND: There is evidence for considerable heterogeneity in the responsiveness to regular physical activity (PA) which might reflect the influence of genetic factors. The aim of this systematic review was to assess whether the response to a PA intervention for measures of body composition and cardiorespiratory fitness is (i) correlated within twin pairs and/or families and (ii) more correlated in monozygotic twins (MZ) compared to dizygotic twins (DZ), which would be consistent with genetic effects. METHODS: We performed electronic database searches, combining key words relating to “physical activity” and “genetics”, in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, SPORTS Discuss, AMED, PsycINFO, WEB OF SCIENCE, and SCOPUS from the earliest records to March 2016. Twin and family studies were included if they assessed body composition and/or cardiorespiratory fitness following a PA intervention, and provided a heritability estimate, maximal heritability estimate, or within MZ twin pair correlation (r(MZ)). Data on heritability (twin studies), maximal heritability (family studies), and the r(MZ) were extracted from included studies, although heritability estimates were not reported as small sample sizes made them uninformative. RESULTS: After screening 224 full texts, nine twin and five family studies were included in this review. The pooled r(MZ) in response to PA was significant for body mass index (r(MZ) = 0.69, n = 58), fat mass (r(MZ) = 0.58, n = 48), body fat percentage (r(MZ) = 0.55, n = 72), waist circumference (r(MZ) = 0.50, n = 27), and VO(2)max (r(MZ) = 0.39, n = 48), where “n” represents the total number of twin pairs from all studies. Maximal heritability estimates ranged from 0–21% for measures of body composition, and 22–57% for cardiorespiratory fitness. Twin studies differed in sample age, baseline values, and PA intervention, although the exclusion of any one study did not affect the results. CONCLUSIONS: Shared familial factors, including genetics, are likely to be a significant contributor to the response of body composition and cardiorespiratory fitness following PA. Genetic factors may explain individual variation in the response to PA. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: PROSPERO Registration No CRD42015020056. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40798-016-0073-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5225201/ /pubmed/28074345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-016-0073-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Zadro, J. R.
Shirley, D.
Andrade, T. B.
Scurrah, K. J
Bauman, A.
Ferreira, P. H.
The Beneficial Effects of Physical Activity: Is It Down to Your Genes? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Twin and Family Studies
title The Beneficial Effects of Physical Activity: Is It Down to Your Genes? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Twin and Family Studies
title_full The Beneficial Effects of Physical Activity: Is It Down to Your Genes? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Twin and Family Studies
title_fullStr The Beneficial Effects of Physical Activity: Is It Down to Your Genes? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Twin and Family Studies
title_full_unstemmed The Beneficial Effects of Physical Activity: Is It Down to Your Genes? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Twin and Family Studies
title_short The Beneficial Effects of Physical Activity: Is It Down to Your Genes? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Twin and Family Studies
title_sort beneficial effects of physical activity: is it down to your genes? a systematic review and meta-analysis of twin and family studies
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5225201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28074345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-016-0073-9
work_keys_str_mv AT zadrojr thebeneficialeffectsofphysicalactivityisitdowntoyourgenesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftwinandfamilystudies
AT shirleyd thebeneficialeffectsofphysicalactivityisitdowntoyourgenesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftwinandfamilystudies
AT andradetb thebeneficialeffectsofphysicalactivityisitdowntoyourgenesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftwinandfamilystudies
AT scurrahkj thebeneficialeffectsofphysicalactivityisitdowntoyourgenesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftwinandfamilystudies
AT baumana thebeneficialeffectsofphysicalactivityisitdowntoyourgenesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftwinandfamilystudies
AT ferreiraph thebeneficialeffectsofphysicalactivityisitdowntoyourgenesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftwinandfamilystudies
AT zadrojr beneficialeffectsofphysicalactivityisitdowntoyourgenesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftwinandfamilystudies
AT shirleyd beneficialeffectsofphysicalactivityisitdowntoyourgenesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftwinandfamilystudies
AT andradetb beneficialeffectsofphysicalactivityisitdowntoyourgenesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftwinandfamilystudies
AT scurrahkj beneficialeffectsofphysicalactivityisitdowntoyourgenesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftwinandfamilystudies
AT baumana beneficialeffectsofphysicalactivityisitdowntoyourgenesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftwinandfamilystudies
AT ferreiraph beneficialeffectsofphysicalactivityisitdowntoyourgenesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftwinandfamilystudies