Cargando…

Auditory Localisation Biases Increase with Sensory Uncertainty

Psychophysical studies have frequently found that adults with normal hearing exhibit systematic errors (biases) in their auditory localisation judgments. Here we tested (i) whether systematic localisation errors could reflect reliance on prior knowledge, as has been proposed for other systematic per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garcia, Sara E., Jones, Pete R., Rubin, Gary S., Nardini, Marko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5225420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28074913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep40567
_version_ 1782493501845405696
author Garcia, Sara E.
Jones, Pete R.
Rubin, Gary S.
Nardini, Marko
author_facet Garcia, Sara E.
Jones, Pete R.
Rubin, Gary S.
Nardini, Marko
author_sort Garcia, Sara E.
collection PubMed
description Psychophysical studies have frequently found that adults with normal hearing exhibit systematic errors (biases) in their auditory localisation judgments. Here we tested (i) whether systematic localisation errors could reflect reliance on prior knowledge, as has been proposed for other systematic perceptual biases, and (ii) whether auditory localisation biases can be reduced following training with accurate visual feedback. Twenty-four normal hearing participants were asked to localise the position of a noise burst along the azimuth before, during, and after training with visual feedback. Consistent with reliance on prior knowledge to reduce sensory uncertainty, we found that auditory localisation biases increased when auditory localisation uncertainty increased. Specifically, participants mis-localised auditory stimuli as being more eccentric than they were, and did so more when auditory uncertainty was greater. However, biases also increased with eccentricity, despite no corresponding increase in uncertainty, which is not readily explained by use of a simple prior favouring peripheral locations. Localisation biases decreased (improved) following training with visual feedback, but the reliability of the visual feedback stimulus did not change the effects of training. We suggest that further research is needed to identify alternative mechanisms, besides use of prior knowledge, that could account for increased perceptual biases under sensory uncertainty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5225420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52254202017-01-17 Auditory Localisation Biases Increase with Sensory Uncertainty Garcia, Sara E. Jones, Pete R. Rubin, Gary S. Nardini, Marko Sci Rep Article Psychophysical studies have frequently found that adults with normal hearing exhibit systematic errors (biases) in their auditory localisation judgments. Here we tested (i) whether systematic localisation errors could reflect reliance on prior knowledge, as has been proposed for other systematic perceptual biases, and (ii) whether auditory localisation biases can be reduced following training with accurate visual feedback. Twenty-four normal hearing participants were asked to localise the position of a noise burst along the azimuth before, during, and after training with visual feedback. Consistent with reliance on prior knowledge to reduce sensory uncertainty, we found that auditory localisation biases increased when auditory localisation uncertainty increased. Specifically, participants mis-localised auditory stimuli as being more eccentric than they were, and did so more when auditory uncertainty was greater. However, biases also increased with eccentricity, despite no corresponding increase in uncertainty, which is not readily explained by use of a simple prior favouring peripheral locations. Localisation biases decreased (improved) following training with visual feedback, but the reliability of the visual feedback stimulus did not change the effects of training. We suggest that further research is needed to identify alternative mechanisms, besides use of prior knowledge, that could account for increased perceptual biases under sensory uncertainty. Nature Publishing Group 2017-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5225420/ /pubmed/28074913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep40567 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Garcia, Sara E.
Jones, Pete R.
Rubin, Gary S.
Nardini, Marko
Auditory Localisation Biases Increase with Sensory Uncertainty
title Auditory Localisation Biases Increase with Sensory Uncertainty
title_full Auditory Localisation Biases Increase with Sensory Uncertainty
title_fullStr Auditory Localisation Biases Increase with Sensory Uncertainty
title_full_unstemmed Auditory Localisation Biases Increase with Sensory Uncertainty
title_short Auditory Localisation Biases Increase with Sensory Uncertainty
title_sort auditory localisation biases increase with sensory uncertainty
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5225420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28074913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep40567
work_keys_str_mv AT garciasarae auditorylocalisationbiasesincreasewithsensoryuncertainty
AT jonespeter auditorylocalisationbiasesincreasewithsensoryuncertainty
AT rubingarys auditorylocalisationbiasesincreasewithsensoryuncertainty
AT nardinimarko auditorylocalisationbiasesincreasewithsensoryuncertainty