Cargando…

Prognostic factors in neuroendocrine carcinoma: biological markers are more useful than histomorphological markers

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NEC) are a very aggressive type of cancer, for which prognostic factors are lacking. We analysed clinical and histomorphological prognostic markers of overall survival (OS), completed with a record of biological and haematological data of patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freis, Patricia, Graillot, Emmanuelle, Rousset, Pascal, Hervieu, Valérie, Chardon, Laurence, Lombard-Bohas, Catherine, Walter, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5225444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28074897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep40609
_version_ 1782493507251863552
author Freis, Patricia
Graillot, Emmanuelle
Rousset, Pascal
Hervieu, Valérie
Chardon, Laurence
Lombard-Bohas, Catherine
Walter, Thomas
author_facet Freis, Patricia
Graillot, Emmanuelle
Rousset, Pascal
Hervieu, Valérie
Chardon, Laurence
Lombard-Bohas, Catherine
Walter, Thomas
author_sort Freis, Patricia
collection PubMed
description Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NEC) are a very aggressive type of cancer, for which prognostic factors are lacking. We analysed clinical and histomorphological prognostic markers of overall survival (OS), completed with a record of biological and haematological data of patients diagnosed between December 2002 and December 2015. The median OS was 16 months (95% CI 13.9–18.1). After univariate analysis, performance status (PS) ≥ 2 and stage IV were associated with a worse outcome (9 months and 14 months, respectively), as well as patients with lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels ≥ 2 ULN (9 months and 8 months, respectively). After multivariate analysis, LDH and AST levels were the only factors that remained significantly associated with better survival: HR 0.36 (p = 0.04) and 0.31 (p = 0.03), respectively. When patients had elevated LDH and AST levels, OS was 20 months, when they had high LDH or AST levels, 13 months and 8 months in the group with low LDH and AST levels (p < 0.001). Therefore, biological data appeared to be more relevant prognostic factors than usual factors described in other studies (PS, stage, and Ki-67). Considering LDH and AST levels at diagnosis could help physicians to predict survival and to stratify patients for clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5225444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52254442017-01-17 Prognostic factors in neuroendocrine carcinoma: biological markers are more useful than histomorphological markers Freis, Patricia Graillot, Emmanuelle Rousset, Pascal Hervieu, Valérie Chardon, Laurence Lombard-Bohas, Catherine Walter, Thomas Sci Rep Article Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NEC) are a very aggressive type of cancer, for which prognostic factors are lacking. We analysed clinical and histomorphological prognostic markers of overall survival (OS), completed with a record of biological and haematological data of patients diagnosed between December 2002 and December 2015. The median OS was 16 months (95% CI 13.9–18.1). After univariate analysis, performance status (PS) ≥ 2 and stage IV were associated with a worse outcome (9 months and 14 months, respectively), as well as patients with lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels ≥ 2 ULN (9 months and 8 months, respectively). After multivariate analysis, LDH and AST levels were the only factors that remained significantly associated with better survival: HR 0.36 (p = 0.04) and 0.31 (p = 0.03), respectively. When patients had elevated LDH and AST levels, OS was 20 months, when they had high LDH or AST levels, 13 months and 8 months in the group with low LDH and AST levels (p < 0.001). Therefore, biological data appeared to be more relevant prognostic factors than usual factors described in other studies (PS, stage, and Ki-67). Considering LDH and AST levels at diagnosis could help physicians to predict survival and to stratify patients for clinical trials. Nature Publishing Group 2017-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5225444/ /pubmed/28074897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep40609 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Freis, Patricia
Graillot, Emmanuelle
Rousset, Pascal
Hervieu, Valérie
Chardon, Laurence
Lombard-Bohas, Catherine
Walter, Thomas
Prognostic factors in neuroendocrine carcinoma: biological markers are more useful than histomorphological markers
title Prognostic factors in neuroendocrine carcinoma: biological markers are more useful than histomorphological markers
title_full Prognostic factors in neuroendocrine carcinoma: biological markers are more useful than histomorphological markers
title_fullStr Prognostic factors in neuroendocrine carcinoma: biological markers are more useful than histomorphological markers
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic factors in neuroendocrine carcinoma: biological markers are more useful than histomorphological markers
title_short Prognostic factors in neuroendocrine carcinoma: biological markers are more useful than histomorphological markers
title_sort prognostic factors in neuroendocrine carcinoma: biological markers are more useful than histomorphological markers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5225444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28074897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep40609
work_keys_str_mv AT freispatricia prognosticfactorsinneuroendocrinecarcinomabiologicalmarkersaremoreusefulthanhistomorphologicalmarkers
AT graillotemmanuelle prognosticfactorsinneuroendocrinecarcinomabiologicalmarkersaremoreusefulthanhistomorphologicalmarkers
AT roussetpascal prognosticfactorsinneuroendocrinecarcinomabiologicalmarkersaremoreusefulthanhistomorphologicalmarkers
AT hervieuvalerie prognosticfactorsinneuroendocrinecarcinomabiologicalmarkersaremoreusefulthanhistomorphologicalmarkers
AT chardonlaurence prognosticfactorsinneuroendocrinecarcinomabiologicalmarkersaremoreusefulthanhistomorphologicalmarkers
AT lombardbohascatherine prognosticfactorsinneuroendocrinecarcinomabiologicalmarkersaremoreusefulthanhistomorphologicalmarkers
AT walterthomas prognosticfactorsinneuroendocrinecarcinomabiologicalmarkersaremoreusefulthanhistomorphologicalmarkers