Cargando…

Detection of Strongylus vulgaris in equine faecal samples by real-time PCR and larval culture – method comparison and occurrence assessment

BACKGROUND: Strongylus vulgaris has become a rare parasite in Germany during the past 50 years due to the practice of frequent prophylactic anthelmintic therapy. To date, the emerging development of resistance in Cyathostominae and Parascaris spp. to numerous equine anthelmintics has changed dewormi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaspar, A., Pfister, K., Nielsen, M. K., Silaghi, C., Fink, H., Scheuerle, M. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5225560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28077153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0918-y
_version_ 1782493531844116480
author Kaspar, A.
Pfister, K.
Nielsen, M. K.
Silaghi, C.
Fink, H.
Scheuerle, M. C.
author_facet Kaspar, A.
Pfister, K.
Nielsen, M. K.
Silaghi, C.
Fink, H.
Scheuerle, M. C.
author_sort Kaspar, A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Strongylus vulgaris has become a rare parasite in Germany during the past 50 years due to the practice of frequent prophylactic anthelmintic therapy. To date, the emerging development of resistance in Cyathostominae and Parascaris spp. to numerous equine anthelmintics has changed deworming management and the frequency of anthelmintic usage. In this regard, reliable detection of parasitic infections, especially of the highly pathogenic S. vulgaris is essential. In the current study, two diagnostic methods for the detection of infections with S. vulgaris were compared and information on the occurrence of this parasite in German horses was gained. For this purpose, faecal samples of 501 horses were screened for S. vulgaris with real-time PCR and an additional larval culture was performed in samples of 278 horses. A subset of 26 horses underwent multiple follow-up examinations with both methods in order to evaluate both the persistence of S. vulgaris infections and the reproducibility of each diagnostic method. RESULTS: The real-time PCR revealed S. vulgaris-DNA in ten of 501 investigated equine samples (1.9%). The larval culture demonstrated larvae of S. vulgaris in three of the 278 samples (1.1%). A direct comparison of the two methods was possible in 321 samples including 43 follow-up examinations with the result of 11 S. vulgaris-positive samples by real-time PCR and 4 S. vulgaris-positive samples by larval culture. The McNemar’s test (p-value = 0.016) revealed a significant difference and the kappa values (0.525) showed a moderate agreement between real-time PCR and larval culture. CONCLUSIONS: The real-time PCR detected a significantly higher proportion of positives of S. vulgaris compared to larval culture and should thus be considered as a routine diagnostic method for the detection of S. vulgaris in equine samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5225560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52255602017-01-17 Detection of Strongylus vulgaris in equine faecal samples by real-time PCR and larval culture – method comparison and occurrence assessment Kaspar, A. Pfister, K. Nielsen, M. K. Silaghi, C. Fink, H. Scheuerle, M. C. BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Strongylus vulgaris has become a rare parasite in Germany during the past 50 years due to the practice of frequent prophylactic anthelmintic therapy. To date, the emerging development of resistance in Cyathostominae and Parascaris spp. to numerous equine anthelmintics has changed deworming management and the frequency of anthelmintic usage. In this regard, reliable detection of parasitic infections, especially of the highly pathogenic S. vulgaris is essential. In the current study, two diagnostic methods for the detection of infections with S. vulgaris were compared and information on the occurrence of this parasite in German horses was gained. For this purpose, faecal samples of 501 horses were screened for S. vulgaris with real-time PCR and an additional larval culture was performed in samples of 278 horses. A subset of 26 horses underwent multiple follow-up examinations with both methods in order to evaluate both the persistence of S. vulgaris infections and the reproducibility of each diagnostic method. RESULTS: The real-time PCR revealed S. vulgaris-DNA in ten of 501 investigated equine samples (1.9%). The larval culture demonstrated larvae of S. vulgaris in three of the 278 samples (1.1%). A direct comparison of the two methods was possible in 321 samples including 43 follow-up examinations with the result of 11 S. vulgaris-positive samples by real-time PCR and 4 S. vulgaris-positive samples by larval culture. The McNemar’s test (p-value = 0.016) revealed a significant difference and the kappa values (0.525) showed a moderate agreement between real-time PCR and larval culture. CONCLUSIONS: The real-time PCR detected a significantly higher proportion of positives of S. vulgaris compared to larval culture and should thus be considered as a routine diagnostic method for the detection of S. vulgaris in equine samples. BioMed Central 2017-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5225560/ /pubmed/28077153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0918-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kaspar, A.
Pfister, K.
Nielsen, M. K.
Silaghi, C.
Fink, H.
Scheuerle, M. C.
Detection of Strongylus vulgaris in equine faecal samples by real-time PCR and larval culture – method comparison and occurrence assessment
title Detection of Strongylus vulgaris in equine faecal samples by real-time PCR and larval culture – method comparison and occurrence assessment
title_full Detection of Strongylus vulgaris in equine faecal samples by real-time PCR and larval culture – method comparison and occurrence assessment
title_fullStr Detection of Strongylus vulgaris in equine faecal samples by real-time PCR and larval culture – method comparison and occurrence assessment
title_full_unstemmed Detection of Strongylus vulgaris in equine faecal samples by real-time PCR and larval culture – method comparison and occurrence assessment
title_short Detection of Strongylus vulgaris in equine faecal samples by real-time PCR and larval culture – method comparison and occurrence assessment
title_sort detection of strongylus vulgaris in equine faecal samples by real-time pcr and larval culture – method comparison and occurrence assessment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5225560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28077153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0918-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kaspara detectionofstrongylusvulgarisinequinefaecalsamplesbyrealtimepcrandlarvalculturemethodcomparisonandoccurrenceassessment
AT pfisterk detectionofstrongylusvulgarisinequinefaecalsamplesbyrealtimepcrandlarvalculturemethodcomparisonandoccurrenceassessment
AT nielsenmk detectionofstrongylusvulgarisinequinefaecalsamplesbyrealtimepcrandlarvalculturemethodcomparisonandoccurrenceassessment
AT silaghic detectionofstrongylusvulgarisinequinefaecalsamplesbyrealtimepcrandlarvalculturemethodcomparisonandoccurrenceassessment
AT finkh detectionofstrongylusvulgarisinequinefaecalsamplesbyrealtimepcrandlarvalculturemethodcomparisonandoccurrenceassessment
AT scheuerlemc detectionofstrongylusvulgarisinequinefaecalsamplesbyrealtimepcrandlarvalculturemethodcomparisonandoccurrenceassessment