Cargando…
Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic urinary catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analyses
BACKGROUND: Intermittent catheterisation is the method of choice for the management of bladder dysfunctions. Different urinary catheters are available, but there is conflicting evidence on which type of catheter is best. The present study provides an objective evaluation of the clinical effectivenes...
Autores principales: | Rognoni, Carla, Tarricone, Rosanna |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5225586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28073354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-016-0191-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Healthcare resource consumption for intermittent urinary catheterisation: cost-effectiveness of hydrophilic catheters and budget impact analyses
por: Rognoni, Carla, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Intermittent self catheterisation with hydrophilic, gel reservoir, and non-coated catheters: a systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis
por: Bermingham, Sarah L, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
User perception of a new hydrophilic‐coated male urinary catheter for intermittent use
por: Koeter, Ingrid, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
A scoping review on the impact of hydrophilic versus non-hydrophilic intermittent catheters on UTI, QoL, satisfaction, preference, and other outcomes in neurogenic and non-neurogenic patients suffering from urinary retention
por: Barken, Kim Bundvig, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Impella Versus VA-ECMO for Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: Comprehensive Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analyses
por: Ardito, Vittoria, et al.
Publicado: (2023)