Cargando…

A double SIMEX approach for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies

BACKGROUND: Bivariate random-effects models represent a widely accepted and recommended approach for meta-analysis of test accuracy studies. Standard likelihood methods routinely used for inference are prone to several drawbacks. Small sample size can give rise to unreliable inferential conclusions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Guolo, Annamaria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5225626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28077079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0284-2
_version_ 1782493547437490176
author Guolo, Annamaria
author_facet Guolo, Annamaria
author_sort Guolo, Annamaria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bivariate random-effects models represent a widely accepted and recommended approach for meta-analysis of test accuracy studies. Standard likelihood methods routinely used for inference are prone to several drawbacks. Small sample size can give rise to unreliable inferential conclusions and convergence issues make the approach unappealing. This paper suggests a different methodology to address such difficulties. METHODS: A SIMEX methodology is proposed. The method is a simulation-based technique originally developed as a correction strategy within the measurement error literature. It suits the meta-analysis framework as the diagnostic accuracy measures provided by each study are prone to measurement error. SIMEX can be straightforwardly adapted to cover different measurement error structures and to deal with covariates. The effortless implementation with standard software is an interesting feature of the method. RESULTS: Extensive simulation studies highlight the improvement provided by SIMEX over likelihood approach in terms of empirical coverage probabilities of confidence intervals under different scenarios, independently of the sample size and the values of the correlation between sensitivity and specificity. A remarkable amelioration is obtained in case of deviations from the normality assumption for the random-effects distribution. From a computational point of view, the application of SIMEX is shown to be neither involved nor subject to the convergence issues affecting likelihood-based alternatives. Application of the method to a diagnostic review of the performance of transesophageal echocardiography for assessing ascending aorta atherosclerosis enables overcoming limitations of the likelihood procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The SIMEX methodology represents an interesting alternative to likelihood-based procedures for inference in meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. The approach can provide more accurate inferential conclusions, while avoiding convergence failure and numerical instabilities. The application of the method in the R programming language is possible through the code which is made available and illustrated using the real data example. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0284-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5225626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52256262017-01-17 A double SIMEX approach for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies Guolo, Annamaria BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Bivariate random-effects models represent a widely accepted and recommended approach for meta-analysis of test accuracy studies. Standard likelihood methods routinely used for inference are prone to several drawbacks. Small sample size can give rise to unreliable inferential conclusions and convergence issues make the approach unappealing. This paper suggests a different methodology to address such difficulties. METHODS: A SIMEX methodology is proposed. The method is a simulation-based technique originally developed as a correction strategy within the measurement error literature. It suits the meta-analysis framework as the diagnostic accuracy measures provided by each study are prone to measurement error. SIMEX can be straightforwardly adapted to cover different measurement error structures and to deal with covariates. The effortless implementation with standard software is an interesting feature of the method. RESULTS: Extensive simulation studies highlight the improvement provided by SIMEX over likelihood approach in terms of empirical coverage probabilities of confidence intervals under different scenarios, independently of the sample size and the values of the correlation between sensitivity and specificity. A remarkable amelioration is obtained in case of deviations from the normality assumption for the random-effects distribution. From a computational point of view, the application of SIMEX is shown to be neither involved nor subject to the convergence issues affecting likelihood-based alternatives. Application of the method to a diagnostic review of the performance of transesophageal echocardiography for assessing ascending aorta atherosclerosis enables overcoming limitations of the likelihood procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The SIMEX methodology represents an interesting alternative to likelihood-based procedures for inference in meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. The approach can provide more accurate inferential conclusions, while avoiding convergence failure and numerical instabilities. The application of the method in the R programming language is possible through the code which is made available and illustrated using the real data example. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0284-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5225626/ /pubmed/28077079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0284-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Guolo, Annamaria
A double SIMEX approach for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies
title A double SIMEX approach for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies
title_full A double SIMEX approach for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies
title_fullStr A double SIMEX approach for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies
title_full_unstemmed A double SIMEX approach for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies
title_short A double SIMEX approach for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies
title_sort double simex approach for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5225626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28077079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0284-2
work_keys_str_mv AT guoloannamaria adoublesimexapproachforbivariaterandomeffectsmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracystudies
AT guoloannamaria doublesimexapproachforbivariaterandomeffectsmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracystudies