Cargando…
Multicentre Evaluation of the Naída CI Q70 Sound Processor: Feedback from Cochlear Implant Users and Professionals
The aim of this survey was to gather data from both implant recipients and professionals on the ease of use of the Naída CI Q70 (Naída CI) sound processor from Advanced Bionics and on the usefulness of the new functions and features available. A secondary objective was to investigate fitting practic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5225802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28217275 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2016.160 |
_version_ | 1782493588908670976 |
---|---|
author | Martin, Jeanette Poncet-Wallet, Christine Illg, Angelika Perrin-Webb, Sarah Henderson, Lise Noël-Petroff, Nathalie Auletta, Gennaro Barezzani, Maria Grazia Houri, Karim Group, Indian Research Bagus, Heike Hoppe, Ulrich Humphries, Jane van Treeck, Wiebke Briaire, Jeroen J. Brendel, Martina Mathias, Nathalie |
author_facet | Martin, Jeanette Poncet-Wallet, Christine Illg, Angelika Perrin-Webb, Sarah Henderson, Lise Noël-Petroff, Nathalie Auletta, Gennaro Barezzani, Maria Grazia Houri, Karim Group, Indian Research Bagus, Heike Hoppe, Ulrich Humphries, Jane van Treeck, Wiebke Briaire, Jeroen J. Brendel, Martina Mathias, Nathalie |
author_sort | Martin, Jeanette |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this survey was to gather data from both implant recipients and professionals on the ease of use of the Naída CI Q70 (Naída CI) sound processor from Advanced Bionics and on the usefulness of the new functions and features available. A secondary objective was to investigate fitting practices with the new processor. A comprehensive user satisfaction survey was conducted in a total of 186 subjects from 24 centres. In parallel, 23 professional questionnaires were collected from 11 centres. Overall, there was high satisfaction with the Naída CI processor from adults, children, experienced and new CI users as well as from professionals. The Naída CI processor was shown as being easy to use by all ages of recipients and by professionals. The majority of experienced CI users rated the Naída CI processor as being similar or better than their previous processor in all areas surveyed. The Naída CI was recommended by the professionals for fitting in all populations. Features like UltraZoom, ZoomControl and DuoPhone would not be fitted to very young children in contrast to adults. Positive ratings were obtained for ease of use, comfort and usefulness of the new functions and features of the Naída CI sound processor. Seventy-seven percent of the experienced CI users rated the new processor as being better than their previous sound processor from a general point of view. The survey also showed that fitting practices were influenced by the age of the user. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5225802 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52258022017-02-17 Multicentre Evaluation of the Naída CI Q70 Sound Processor: Feedback from Cochlear Implant Users and Professionals Martin, Jeanette Poncet-Wallet, Christine Illg, Angelika Perrin-Webb, Sarah Henderson, Lise Noël-Petroff, Nathalie Auletta, Gennaro Barezzani, Maria Grazia Houri, Karim Group, Indian Research Bagus, Heike Hoppe, Ulrich Humphries, Jane van Treeck, Wiebke Briaire, Jeroen J. Brendel, Martina Mathias, Nathalie Audiol Res Article The aim of this survey was to gather data from both implant recipients and professionals on the ease of use of the Naída CI Q70 (Naída CI) sound processor from Advanced Bionics and on the usefulness of the new functions and features available. A secondary objective was to investigate fitting practices with the new processor. A comprehensive user satisfaction survey was conducted in a total of 186 subjects from 24 centres. In parallel, 23 professional questionnaires were collected from 11 centres. Overall, there was high satisfaction with the Naída CI processor from adults, children, experienced and new CI users as well as from professionals. The Naída CI processor was shown as being easy to use by all ages of recipients and by professionals. The majority of experienced CI users rated the Naída CI processor as being similar or better than their previous processor in all areas surveyed. The Naída CI was recommended by the professionals for fitting in all populations. Features like UltraZoom, ZoomControl and DuoPhone would not be fitted to very young children in contrast to adults. Positive ratings were obtained for ease of use, comfort and usefulness of the new functions and features of the Naída CI sound processor. Seventy-seven percent of the experienced CI users rated the new processor as being better than their previous sound processor from a general point of view. The survey also showed that fitting practices were influenced by the age of the user. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2016-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5225802/ /pubmed/28217275 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2016.160 Text en ©Copyright J. Martin et al., 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC 4.0). |
spellingShingle | Article Martin, Jeanette Poncet-Wallet, Christine Illg, Angelika Perrin-Webb, Sarah Henderson, Lise Noël-Petroff, Nathalie Auletta, Gennaro Barezzani, Maria Grazia Houri, Karim Group, Indian Research Bagus, Heike Hoppe, Ulrich Humphries, Jane van Treeck, Wiebke Briaire, Jeroen J. Brendel, Martina Mathias, Nathalie Multicentre Evaluation of the Naída CI Q70 Sound Processor: Feedback from Cochlear Implant Users and Professionals |
title | Multicentre Evaluation of the Naída CI Q70 Sound Processor: Feedback from Cochlear Implant Users and Professionals |
title_full | Multicentre Evaluation of the Naída CI Q70 Sound Processor: Feedback from Cochlear Implant Users and Professionals |
title_fullStr | Multicentre Evaluation of the Naída CI Q70 Sound Processor: Feedback from Cochlear Implant Users and Professionals |
title_full_unstemmed | Multicentre Evaluation of the Naída CI Q70 Sound Processor: Feedback from Cochlear Implant Users and Professionals |
title_short | Multicentre Evaluation of the Naída CI Q70 Sound Processor: Feedback from Cochlear Implant Users and Professionals |
title_sort | multicentre evaluation of the naída ci q70 sound processor: feedback from cochlear implant users and professionals |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5225802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28217275 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2016.160 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinjeanette multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals AT poncetwalletchristine multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals AT illgangelika multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals AT perrinwebbsarah multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals AT hendersonlise multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals AT noelpetroffnathalie multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals AT aulettagennaro multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals AT barezzanimariagrazia multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals AT hourikarim multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals AT groupindianresearch multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals AT bagusheike multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals AT hoppeulrich multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals AT humphriesjane multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals AT vantreeckwiebke multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals AT briairejeroenj multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals AT brendelmartina multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals AT mathiasnathalie multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals |