Cargando…

Multicentre Evaluation of the Naída CI Q70 Sound Processor: Feedback from Cochlear Implant Users and Professionals

The aim of this survey was to gather data from both implant recipients and professionals on the ease of use of the Naída CI Q70 (Naída CI) sound processor from Advanced Bionics and on the usefulness of the new functions and features available. A secondary objective was to investigate fitting practic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin, Jeanette, Poncet-Wallet, Christine, Illg, Angelika, Perrin-Webb, Sarah, Henderson, Lise, Noël-Petroff, Nathalie, Auletta, Gennaro, Barezzani, Maria Grazia, Houri, Karim, Group, Indian Research, Bagus, Heike, Hoppe, Ulrich, Humphries, Jane, van Treeck, Wiebke, Briaire, Jeroen J., Brendel, Martina, Mathias, Nathalie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5225802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28217275
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2016.160
_version_ 1782493588908670976
author Martin, Jeanette
Poncet-Wallet, Christine
Illg, Angelika
Perrin-Webb, Sarah
Henderson, Lise
Noël-Petroff, Nathalie
Auletta, Gennaro
Barezzani, Maria Grazia
Houri, Karim
Group, Indian Research
Bagus, Heike
Hoppe, Ulrich
Humphries, Jane
van Treeck, Wiebke
Briaire, Jeroen J.
Brendel, Martina
Mathias, Nathalie
author_facet Martin, Jeanette
Poncet-Wallet, Christine
Illg, Angelika
Perrin-Webb, Sarah
Henderson, Lise
Noël-Petroff, Nathalie
Auletta, Gennaro
Barezzani, Maria Grazia
Houri, Karim
Group, Indian Research
Bagus, Heike
Hoppe, Ulrich
Humphries, Jane
van Treeck, Wiebke
Briaire, Jeroen J.
Brendel, Martina
Mathias, Nathalie
author_sort Martin, Jeanette
collection PubMed
description The aim of this survey was to gather data from both implant recipients and professionals on the ease of use of the Naída CI Q70 (Naída CI) sound processor from Advanced Bionics and on the usefulness of the new functions and features available. A secondary objective was to investigate fitting practices with the new processor. A comprehensive user satisfaction survey was conducted in a total of 186 subjects from 24 centres. In parallel, 23 professional questionnaires were collected from 11 centres. Overall, there was high satisfaction with the Naída CI processor from adults, children, experienced and new CI users as well as from professionals. The Naída CI processor was shown as being easy to use by all ages of recipients and by professionals. The majority of experienced CI users rated the Naída CI processor as being similar or better than their previous processor in all areas surveyed. The Naída CI was recommended by the professionals for fitting in all populations. Features like UltraZoom, ZoomControl and DuoPhone would not be fitted to very young children in contrast to adults. Positive ratings were obtained for ease of use, comfort and usefulness of the new functions and features of the Naída CI sound processor. Seventy-seven percent of the experienced CI users rated the new processor as being better than their previous sound processor from a general point of view. The survey also showed that fitting practices were influenced by the age of the user.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5225802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52258022017-02-17 Multicentre Evaluation of the Naída CI Q70 Sound Processor: Feedback from Cochlear Implant Users and Professionals Martin, Jeanette Poncet-Wallet, Christine Illg, Angelika Perrin-Webb, Sarah Henderson, Lise Noël-Petroff, Nathalie Auletta, Gennaro Barezzani, Maria Grazia Houri, Karim Group, Indian Research Bagus, Heike Hoppe, Ulrich Humphries, Jane van Treeck, Wiebke Briaire, Jeroen J. Brendel, Martina Mathias, Nathalie Audiol Res Article The aim of this survey was to gather data from both implant recipients and professionals on the ease of use of the Naída CI Q70 (Naída CI) sound processor from Advanced Bionics and on the usefulness of the new functions and features available. A secondary objective was to investigate fitting practices with the new processor. A comprehensive user satisfaction survey was conducted in a total of 186 subjects from 24 centres. In parallel, 23 professional questionnaires were collected from 11 centres. Overall, there was high satisfaction with the Naída CI processor from adults, children, experienced and new CI users as well as from professionals. The Naída CI processor was shown as being easy to use by all ages of recipients and by professionals. The majority of experienced CI users rated the Naída CI processor as being similar or better than their previous processor in all areas surveyed. The Naída CI was recommended by the professionals for fitting in all populations. Features like UltraZoom, ZoomControl and DuoPhone would not be fitted to very young children in contrast to adults. Positive ratings were obtained for ease of use, comfort and usefulness of the new functions and features of the Naída CI sound processor. Seventy-seven percent of the experienced CI users rated the new processor as being better than their previous sound processor from a general point of view. The survey also showed that fitting practices were influenced by the age of the user. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2016-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5225802/ /pubmed/28217275 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2016.160 Text en ©Copyright J. Martin et al., 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
spellingShingle Article
Martin, Jeanette
Poncet-Wallet, Christine
Illg, Angelika
Perrin-Webb, Sarah
Henderson, Lise
Noël-Petroff, Nathalie
Auletta, Gennaro
Barezzani, Maria Grazia
Houri, Karim
Group, Indian Research
Bagus, Heike
Hoppe, Ulrich
Humphries, Jane
van Treeck, Wiebke
Briaire, Jeroen J.
Brendel, Martina
Mathias, Nathalie
Multicentre Evaluation of the Naída CI Q70 Sound Processor: Feedback from Cochlear Implant Users and Professionals
title Multicentre Evaluation of the Naída CI Q70 Sound Processor: Feedback from Cochlear Implant Users and Professionals
title_full Multicentre Evaluation of the Naída CI Q70 Sound Processor: Feedback from Cochlear Implant Users and Professionals
title_fullStr Multicentre Evaluation of the Naída CI Q70 Sound Processor: Feedback from Cochlear Implant Users and Professionals
title_full_unstemmed Multicentre Evaluation of the Naída CI Q70 Sound Processor: Feedback from Cochlear Implant Users and Professionals
title_short Multicentre Evaluation of the Naída CI Q70 Sound Processor: Feedback from Cochlear Implant Users and Professionals
title_sort multicentre evaluation of the naída ci q70 sound processor: feedback from cochlear implant users and professionals
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5225802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28217275
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2016.160
work_keys_str_mv AT martinjeanette multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals
AT poncetwalletchristine multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals
AT illgangelika multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals
AT perrinwebbsarah multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals
AT hendersonlise multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals
AT noelpetroffnathalie multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals
AT aulettagennaro multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals
AT barezzanimariagrazia multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals
AT hourikarim multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals
AT groupindianresearch multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals
AT bagusheike multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals
AT hoppeulrich multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals
AT humphriesjane multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals
AT vantreeckwiebke multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals
AT briairejeroenj multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals
AT brendelmartina multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals
AT mathiasnathalie multicentreevaluationofthenaidaciq70soundprocessorfeedbackfromcochlearimplantusersandprofessionals