Cargando…

DO PROXIMAL AND DISTAL GASTRIC TUMOURS BEHAVE DIFFERENTLY?

BACKGROUND: Although the incidence of gastric (adenocarcinoma) cancer has been decreasing over time, it is still one of the most common malignancies worldwide, and proximal tumours tend to have a worse prognosis. AIM: To compare surgical outcomes and prognosis between proximal - excluding tumours of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: da COSTA, Laurence Bedin, TONETO, Marcelo Garcia, MOREIRA, Luis Fernando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5225861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28076476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-6720201600040005
_version_ 1782493593394479104
author da COSTA, Laurence Bedin
TONETO, Marcelo Garcia
MOREIRA, Luis Fernando
author_facet da COSTA, Laurence Bedin
TONETO, Marcelo Garcia
MOREIRA, Luis Fernando
author_sort da COSTA, Laurence Bedin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although the incidence of gastric (adenocarcinoma) cancer has been decreasing over time, it is still one of the most common malignancies worldwide, and proximal tumours tend to have a worse prognosis. AIM: To compare surgical outcomes and prognosis between proximal - excluding tumours of the cardia - and distal gastric cancer. METHODS: Out of 293 cases reviewed - 209 with distal and 69 with proximal gastric cancer - were compared for clinical and pathological features, stage, surgical outcome, mortality and survival. RESULTS: Statistically, there was no significant difference between patients in both groups regarding mortality (p=0.661), adjuvant chemotherapy (p 0.661), and radiation (p=1.000). However, there was significant difference in the degree of lymph node dissection employed (p=0.002) and the number of positive lymph nodes resected (p=0.038) between the two groups. The odds of death at five years for patients who had a D0 dissection was three times greater (odds ratio 2.78; (95%CI 1.33-5.82) than that for patients who had a D2 dissection, while for patients who had a D1 dissection the odds ratio was only 1.41 (95%CI 0.71-2.83) compared to D2-dissected patients. CONCLUSION: Although no significant differences were found between proximal and distal gastric cancer, the increased risk of death in D0- and D1-dissected patients clearly suggests an important role of radical D2 lymph node dissection in survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5225861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52258612017-01-17 DO PROXIMAL AND DISTAL GASTRIC TUMOURS BEHAVE DIFFERENTLY? da COSTA, Laurence Bedin TONETO, Marcelo Garcia MOREIRA, Luis Fernando Arq Bras Cir Dig Original Article BACKGROUND: Although the incidence of gastric (adenocarcinoma) cancer has been decreasing over time, it is still one of the most common malignancies worldwide, and proximal tumours tend to have a worse prognosis. AIM: To compare surgical outcomes and prognosis between proximal - excluding tumours of the cardia - and distal gastric cancer. METHODS: Out of 293 cases reviewed - 209 with distal and 69 with proximal gastric cancer - were compared for clinical and pathological features, stage, surgical outcome, mortality and survival. RESULTS: Statistically, there was no significant difference between patients in both groups regarding mortality (p=0.661), adjuvant chemotherapy (p 0.661), and radiation (p=1.000). However, there was significant difference in the degree of lymph node dissection employed (p=0.002) and the number of positive lymph nodes resected (p=0.038) between the two groups. The odds of death at five years for patients who had a D0 dissection was three times greater (odds ratio 2.78; (95%CI 1.33-5.82) than that for patients who had a D2 dissection, while for patients who had a D1 dissection the odds ratio was only 1.41 (95%CI 0.71-2.83) compared to D2-dissected patients. CONCLUSION: Although no significant differences were found between proximal and distal gastric cancer, the increased risk of death in D0- and D1-dissected patients clearly suggests an important role of radical D2 lymph node dissection in survival. Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5225861/ /pubmed/28076476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-6720201600040005 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
da COSTA, Laurence Bedin
TONETO, Marcelo Garcia
MOREIRA, Luis Fernando
DO PROXIMAL AND DISTAL GASTRIC TUMOURS BEHAVE DIFFERENTLY?
title DO PROXIMAL AND DISTAL GASTRIC TUMOURS BEHAVE DIFFERENTLY?
title_full DO PROXIMAL AND DISTAL GASTRIC TUMOURS BEHAVE DIFFERENTLY?
title_fullStr DO PROXIMAL AND DISTAL GASTRIC TUMOURS BEHAVE DIFFERENTLY?
title_full_unstemmed DO PROXIMAL AND DISTAL GASTRIC TUMOURS BEHAVE DIFFERENTLY?
title_short DO PROXIMAL AND DISTAL GASTRIC TUMOURS BEHAVE DIFFERENTLY?
title_sort do proximal and distal gastric tumours behave differently?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5225861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28076476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-6720201600040005
work_keys_str_mv AT dacostalaurencebedin doproximalanddistalgastrictumoursbehavedifferently
AT tonetomarcelogarcia doproximalanddistalgastrictumoursbehavedifferently
AT moreiraluisfernando doproximalanddistalgastrictumoursbehavedifferently