Cargando…
Concurrent chemoradiation versus radiotherapy alone for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer in a low-resource setting
Our goal was to determine the clinical treatment response following radiation administered with or without chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancers in Honduras. This is a retrospective study of patients treated with either concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) or external beam radiation therapy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5226661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28116341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2016.12.006 |
_version_ | 1782493684096303104 |
---|---|
author | Pereira, Elena Cooper, Hoover Henriquez Zelaya, Pedro Guillermo Creasman, William Price, Fredric V. Gupta, Vishal Chuang, Linus |
author_facet | Pereira, Elena Cooper, Hoover Henriquez Zelaya, Pedro Guillermo Creasman, William Price, Fredric V. Gupta, Vishal Chuang, Linus |
author_sort | Pereira, Elena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Our goal was to determine the clinical treatment response following radiation administered with or without chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancers in Honduras. This is a retrospective study of patients treated with either concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone at a hospital in Tegucigalpa, Honduras. 70 Gy of EBRT to the pelvis was given in all cases. Brachytherapy was not available. Chemotherapy was given when available. Extrafascial hysterectomy was performed 6 weeks after completion of treatment in patients with a complete clinical response (cCR). Records for 165 women with locally advanced cervical cancer were reviewed; 25 (15.2%) stage IB2, 15 (9.1%) stage IIA, 90 (54.5%) stage IIB, and 35 (21.2%) stage IIIB. Ninety (54.5%) patients received EBRT alone; 75 (45.5%) received CCRT. Twenty-three (33.3%) of CCRT patients received weekly cisplatin, the remainder receiving other agents. Seventy (77.8%) of the 90 patients who received EBRT had a cCR; 25 out of 75 (33.3%) patients in the CCRT group achieved a cCR. The CCRT group treated with weekly cisplatin achieved an 80% cCR; while the CCRT group given alternative agents had only a 31% cCR. Patients unable to receive platinum-based CCRT had the worst outcome, and their responses were inferior to patients who received EBRT. The challenges of treating women with locally advanced cervical cancer in a low-resource setting are multifactorial and include treatment delays, the lack of brachytherapy and the unpredictable availability of chemotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5226661 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52266612017-01-23 Concurrent chemoradiation versus radiotherapy alone for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer in a low-resource setting Pereira, Elena Cooper, Hoover Henriquez Zelaya, Pedro Guillermo Creasman, William Price, Fredric V. Gupta, Vishal Chuang, Linus Gynecol Oncol Rep Survey Article Our goal was to determine the clinical treatment response following radiation administered with or without chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancers in Honduras. This is a retrospective study of patients treated with either concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone at a hospital in Tegucigalpa, Honduras. 70 Gy of EBRT to the pelvis was given in all cases. Brachytherapy was not available. Chemotherapy was given when available. Extrafascial hysterectomy was performed 6 weeks after completion of treatment in patients with a complete clinical response (cCR). Records for 165 women with locally advanced cervical cancer were reviewed; 25 (15.2%) stage IB2, 15 (9.1%) stage IIA, 90 (54.5%) stage IIB, and 35 (21.2%) stage IIIB. Ninety (54.5%) patients received EBRT alone; 75 (45.5%) received CCRT. Twenty-three (33.3%) of CCRT patients received weekly cisplatin, the remainder receiving other agents. Seventy (77.8%) of the 90 patients who received EBRT had a cCR; 25 out of 75 (33.3%) patients in the CCRT group achieved a cCR. The CCRT group treated with weekly cisplatin achieved an 80% cCR; while the CCRT group given alternative agents had only a 31% cCR. Patients unable to receive platinum-based CCRT had the worst outcome, and their responses were inferior to patients who received EBRT. The challenges of treating women with locally advanced cervical cancer in a low-resource setting are multifactorial and include treatment delays, the lack of brachytherapy and the unpredictable availability of chemotherapy. Elsevier 2016-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5226661/ /pubmed/28116341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2016.12.006 Text en © 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Survey Article Pereira, Elena Cooper, Hoover Henriquez Zelaya, Pedro Guillermo Creasman, William Price, Fredric V. Gupta, Vishal Chuang, Linus Concurrent chemoradiation versus radiotherapy alone for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer in a low-resource setting |
title | Concurrent chemoradiation versus radiotherapy alone for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer in a low-resource setting |
title_full | Concurrent chemoradiation versus radiotherapy alone for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer in a low-resource setting |
title_fullStr | Concurrent chemoradiation versus radiotherapy alone for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer in a low-resource setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Concurrent chemoradiation versus radiotherapy alone for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer in a low-resource setting |
title_short | Concurrent chemoradiation versus radiotherapy alone for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer in a low-resource setting |
title_sort | concurrent chemoradiation versus radiotherapy alone for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer in a low-resource setting |
topic | Survey Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5226661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28116341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2016.12.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pereiraelena concurrentchemoradiationversusradiotherapyaloneforthetreatmentoflocallyadvancedcervicalcancerinalowresourcesetting AT cooperhooverhenriquez concurrentchemoradiationversusradiotherapyaloneforthetreatmentoflocallyadvancedcervicalcancerinalowresourcesetting AT zelayapedroguillermo concurrentchemoradiationversusradiotherapyaloneforthetreatmentoflocallyadvancedcervicalcancerinalowresourcesetting AT creasmanwilliam concurrentchemoradiationversusradiotherapyaloneforthetreatmentoflocallyadvancedcervicalcancerinalowresourcesetting AT pricefredricv concurrentchemoradiationversusradiotherapyaloneforthetreatmentoflocallyadvancedcervicalcancerinalowresourcesetting AT guptavishal concurrentchemoradiationversusradiotherapyaloneforthetreatmentoflocallyadvancedcervicalcancerinalowresourcesetting AT chuanglinus concurrentchemoradiationversusradiotherapyaloneforthetreatmentoflocallyadvancedcervicalcancerinalowresourcesetting |