Cargando…

Concurrent chemoradiation versus radiotherapy alone for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer in a low-resource setting

Our goal was to determine the clinical treatment response following radiation administered with or without chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancers in Honduras. This is a retrospective study of patients treated with either concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) or external beam radiation therapy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pereira, Elena, Cooper, Hoover Henriquez, Zelaya, Pedro Guillermo, Creasman, William, Price, Fredric V., Gupta, Vishal, Chuang, Linus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5226661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28116341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2016.12.006
_version_ 1782493684096303104
author Pereira, Elena
Cooper, Hoover Henriquez
Zelaya, Pedro Guillermo
Creasman, William
Price, Fredric V.
Gupta, Vishal
Chuang, Linus
author_facet Pereira, Elena
Cooper, Hoover Henriquez
Zelaya, Pedro Guillermo
Creasman, William
Price, Fredric V.
Gupta, Vishal
Chuang, Linus
author_sort Pereira, Elena
collection PubMed
description Our goal was to determine the clinical treatment response following radiation administered with or without chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancers in Honduras. This is a retrospective study of patients treated with either concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone at a hospital in Tegucigalpa, Honduras. 70 Gy of EBRT to the pelvis was given in all cases. Brachytherapy was not available. Chemotherapy was given when available. Extrafascial hysterectomy was performed 6 weeks after completion of treatment in patients with a complete clinical response (cCR). Records for 165 women with locally advanced cervical cancer were reviewed; 25 (15.2%) stage IB2, 15 (9.1%) stage IIA, 90 (54.5%) stage IIB, and 35 (21.2%) stage IIIB. Ninety (54.5%) patients received EBRT alone; 75 (45.5%) received CCRT. Twenty-three (33.3%) of CCRT patients received weekly cisplatin, the remainder receiving other agents. Seventy (77.8%) of the 90 patients who received EBRT had a cCR; 25 out of 75 (33.3%) patients in the CCRT group achieved a cCR. The CCRT group treated with weekly cisplatin achieved an 80% cCR; while the CCRT group given alternative agents had only a 31% cCR. Patients unable to receive platinum-based CCRT had the worst outcome, and their responses were inferior to patients who received EBRT. The challenges of treating women with locally advanced cervical cancer in a low-resource setting are multifactorial and include treatment delays, the lack of brachytherapy and the unpredictable availability of chemotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5226661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52266612017-01-23 Concurrent chemoradiation versus radiotherapy alone for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer in a low-resource setting Pereira, Elena Cooper, Hoover Henriquez Zelaya, Pedro Guillermo Creasman, William Price, Fredric V. Gupta, Vishal Chuang, Linus Gynecol Oncol Rep Survey Article Our goal was to determine the clinical treatment response following radiation administered with or without chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancers in Honduras. This is a retrospective study of patients treated with either concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone at a hospital in Tegucigalpa, Honduras. 70 Gy of EBRT to the pelvis was given in all cases. Brachytherapy was not available. Chemotherapy was given when available. Extrafascial hysterectomy was performed 6 weeks after completion of treatment in patients with a complete clinical response (cCR). Records for 165 women with locally advanced cervical cancer were reviewed; 25 (15.2%) stage IB2, 15 (9.1%) stage IIA, 90 (54.5%) stage IIB, and 35 (21.2%) stage IIIB. Ninety (54.5%) patients received EBRT alone; 75 (45.5%) received CCRT. Twenty-three (33.3%) of CCRT patients received weekly cisplatin, the remainder receiving other agents. Seventy (77.8%) of the 90 patients who received EBRT had a cCR; 25 out of 75 (33.3%) patients in the CCRT group achieved a cCR. The CCRT group treated with weekly cisplatin achieved an 80% cCR; while the CCRT group given alternative agents had only a 31% cCR. Patients unable to receive platinum-based CCRT had the worst outcome, and their responses were inferior to patients who received EBRT. The challenges of treating women with locally advanced cervical cancer in a low-resource setting are multifactorial and include treatment delays, the lack of brachytherapy and the unpredictable availability of chemotherapy. Elsevier 2016-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5226661/ /pubmed/28116341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2016.12.006 Text en © 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Survey Article
Pereira, Elena
Cooper, Hoover Henriquez
Zelaya, Pedro Guillermo
Creasman, William
Price, Fredric V.
Gupta, Vishal
Chuang, Linus
Concurrent chemoradiation versus radiotherapy alone for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer in a low-resource setting
title Concurrent chemoradiation versus radiotherapy alone for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer in a low-resource setting
title_full Concurrent chemoradiation versus radiotherapy alone for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer in a low-resource setting
title_fullStr Concurrent chemoradiation versus radiotherapy alone for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer in a low-resource setting
title_full_unstemmed Concurrent chemoradiation versus radiotherapy alone for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer in a low-resource setting
title_short Concurrent chemoradiation versus radiotherapy alone for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer in a low-resource setting
title_sort concurrent chemoradiation versus radiotherapy alone for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer in a low-resource setting
topic Survey Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5226661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28116341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2016.12.006
work_keys_str_mv AT pereiraelena concurrentchemoradiationversusradiotherapyaloneforthetreatmentoflocallyadvancedcervicalcancerinalowresourcesetting
AT cooperhooverhenriquez concurrentchemoradiationversusradiotherapyaloneforthetreatmentoflocallyadvancedcervicalcancerinalowresourcesetting
AT zelayapedroguillermo concurrentchemoradiationversusradiotherapyaloneforthetreatmentoflocallyadvancedcervicalcancerinalowresourcesetting
AT creasmanwilliam concurrentchemoradiationversusradiotherapyaloneforthetreatmentoflocallyadvancedcervicalcancerinalowresourcesetting
AT pricefredricv concurrentchemoradiationversusradiotherapyaloneforthetreatmentoflocallyadvancedcervicalcancerinalowresourcesetting
AT guptavishal concurrentchemoradiationversusradiotherapyaloneforthetreatmentoflocallyadvancedcervicalcancerinalowresourcesetting
AT chuanglinus concurrentchemoradiationversusradiotherapyaloneforthetreatmentoflocallyadvancedcervicalcancerinalowresourcesetting