Cargando…
Characteristics of Real-Time, Non-Critical Incident Debriefing Practices in the Emergency Department
INTRODUCTION: Benefits of post-simulation debriefings as an educational and feedback tool have been widely accepted for nearly a decade. Real-time, non-critical incident debriefing is similar to post-simulation debriefing; however, data on its practice in academic emergency departments (ED), is limi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5226751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28116028 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.10.31467 |
_version_ | 1782493703333478400 |
---|---|
author | Nadir, Nur-Ain Bentley, Suzanne Papanagnou, Dimitrios Bajaj, Komal Rinnert, Stephan Sinert, Richard |
author_facet | Nadir, Nur-Ain Bentley, Suzanne Papanagnou, Dimitrios Bajaj, Komal Rinnert, Stephan Sinert, Richard |
author_sort | Nadir, Nur-Ain |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Benefits of post-simulation debriefings as an educational and feedback tool have been widely accepted for nearly a decade. Real-time, non-critical incident debriefing is similar to post-simulation debriefing; however, data on its practice in academic emergency departments (ED), is limited. Although tools such as TeamSTEPPS® (Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety) suggest debriefing after complicated medical situations, they do not teach debriefing skills suited to this purpose. Anecdotal evidence suggests that real-time debriefings (or non-critical incident debriefings) do in fact occur in academic EDs;, however, limited research has been performed on this subject. The objective of this study was to characterize real-time, non-critical incident debriefing practices in emergency medicine (EM). METHODS: We conducted this multicenter cross-sectional study of EM attendings and residents at four large, high-volume, academic EM residency programs in New York City. Questionnaire design was based on a Delphi panel and pilot testing with expert panel. We sought a convenience sample from a potential pool of approximately 300 physicians across the four sites with the goal of obtaining >100 responses. The survey was sent electronically to the four residency list-serves with a total of six monthly completion reminder emails. We collected all data electronically and anonymously using SurveyMonkey.com; the data were then entered into and analyzed with Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: The data elucidate various characteristics of current real-time debriefing trends in EM, including its definition, perceived benefits and barriers, as well as the variety of formats of debriefings currently being conducted. CONCLUSION: This survey regarding the practice of real-time, non-critical incident debriefings in four major academic EM programs within New York City sheds light on three major, pertinent points: 1) real-time, non-critical incident debriefing definitely occurs in academic emergency practice; 2) in general, real-time debriefing is perceived to be of some value with respect to education, systems and performance improvement; 3) although it is practiced by clinicians, most report no formal training in actual debriefing techniques. Further study is needed to clarify actual benefits of real-time/non-critical incident debriefing as well as details on potential pitfalls of this practice and recommendations for best practices for use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5226751 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52267512017-01-23 Characteristics of Real-Time, Non-Critical Incident Debriefing Practices in the Emergency Department Nadir, Nur-Ain Bentley, Suzanne Papanagnou, Dimitrios Bajaj, Komal Rinnert, Stephan Sinert, Richard West J Emerg Med Original Research INTRODUCTION: Benefits of post-simulation debriefings as an educational and feedback tool have been widely accepted for nearly a decade. Real-time, non-critical incident debriefing is similar to post-simulation debriefing; however, data on its practice in academic emergency departments (ED), is limited. Although tools such as TeamSTEPPS® (Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety) suggest debriefing after complicated medical situations, they do not teach debriefing skills suited to this purpose. Anecdotal evidence suggests that real-time debriefings (or non-critical incident debriefings) do in fact occur in academic EDs;, however, limited research has been performed on this subject. The objective of this study was to characterize real-time, non-critical incident debriefing practices in emergency medicine (EM). METHODS: We conducted this multicenter cross-sectional study of EM attendings and residents at four large, high-volume, academic EM residency programs in New York City. Questionnaire design was based on a Delphi panel and pilot testing with expert panel. We sought a convenience sample from a potential pool of approximately 300 physicians across the four sites with the goal of obtaining >100 responses. The survey was sent electronically to the four residency list-serves with a total of six monthly completion reminder emails. We collected all data electronically and anonymously using SurveyMonkey.com; the data were then entered into and analyzed with Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: The data elucidate various characteristics of current real-time debriefing trends in EM, including its definition, perceived benefits and barriers, as well as the variety of formats of debriefings currently being conducted. CONCLUSION: This survey regarding the practice of real-time, non-critical incident debriefings in four major academic EM programs within New York City sheds light on three major, pertinent points: 1) real-time, non-critical incident debriefing definitely occurs in academic emergency practice; 2) in general, real-time debriefing is perceived to be of some value with respect to education, systems and performance improvement; 3) although it is practiced by clinicians, most report no formal training in actual debriefing techniques. Further study is needed to clarify actual benefits of real-time/non-critical incident debriefing as well as details on potential pitfalls of this practice and recommendations for best practices for use. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2017-01 2016-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5226751/ /pubmed/28116028 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.10.31467 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Nadir et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Research Nadir, Nur-Ain Bentley, Suzanne Papanagnou, Dimitrios Bajaj, Komal Rinnert, Stephan Sinert, Richard Characteristics of Real-Time, Non-Critical Incident Debriefing Practices in the Emergency Department |
title | Characteristics of Real-Time, Non-Critical Incident Debriefing Practices in the Emergency Department |
title_full | Characteristics of Real-Time, Non-Critical Incident Debriefing Practices in the Emergency Department |
title_fullStr | Characteristics of Real-Time, Non-Critical Incident Debriefing Practices in the Emergency Department |
title_full_unstemmed | Characteristics of Real-Time, Non-Critical Incident Debriefing Practices in the Emergency Department |
title_short | Characteristics of Real-Time, Non-Critical Incident Debriefing Practices in the Emergency Department |
title_sort | characteristics of real-time, non-critical incident debriefing practices in the emergency department |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5226751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28116028 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.10.31467 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nadirnurain characteristicsofrealtimenoncriticalincidentdebriefingpracticesintheemergencydepartment AT bentleysuzanne characteristicsofrealtimenoncriticalincidentdebriefingpracticesintheemergencydepartment AT papanagnoudimitrios characteristicsofrealtimenoncriticalincidentdebriefingpracticesintheemergencydepartment AT bajajkomal characteristicsofrealtimenoncriticalincidentdebriefingpracticesintheemergencydepartment AT rinnertstephan characteristicsofrealtimenoncriticalincidentdebriefingpracticesintheemergencydepartment AT sinertrichard characteristicsofrealtimenoncriticalincidentdebriefingpracticesintheemergencydepartment |