Cargando…

Emergency Medicine Resident Orientation: How Training Programs Get Their Residents Started

INTRODUCTION: The first formal orientation program for incoming emergency medicine (EM) residents was started in 1976. The last attempt to describe the nature of orientation programs was by Brillman in 1995. Now almost all residencies offer orientation to incoming residents, but little is known abou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGrath, Jillian, Barrie, Michael, Way, David P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5226773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28116017
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.10.31275
_version_ 1782493710208991232
author McGrath, Jillian
Barrie, Michael
Way, David P.
author_facet McGrath, Jillian
Barrie, Michael
Way, David P.
author_sort McGrath, Jillian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The first formal orientation program for incoming emergency medicine (EM) residents was started in 1976. The last attempt to describe the nature of orientation programs was by Brillman in 1995. Now almost all residencies offer orientation to incoming residents, but little is known about the curricular content or structure of these programs. The purpose of this project was to describe the current composition and purpose of EM resident orientation programs in the United States. METHODS: In autumn of 2014, we surveyed all U.S. EM residency program directors (n=167). We adapted our survey instrument from one used by Brillman (1995). The survey was designed to assess the orientation program’s purpose, structure, content, and teaching methods. RESULTS: The survey return rate was 63% (105 of 167). Most respondents (77%) directed three-year residencies, and all but one program offered intern orientation. Orientations lasted an average of nine clinical (Std. Dev.=7.3) and 13 non-clinical days (Std. Dev.=9.3). The prototypical breakdown of program activities was 27% lectures, 23% clinical work, 16% skills training, 10% administrative activities, 9% socialization and 15% other activities. Most orientations included activities to promote socialization among interns (98%) and with other members of the department (91%). Many programs (87%) included special certification courses (ACLS, ATLS, PALS, NRP). Course content included the following: use of electronic medical records (90%), physician wellness (75%), and chief complaint-based lectures (72%). Procedural skill sessions covered ultrasound (94%), airway management (91%), vascular access (90%), wound management (77%), splinting (67%), and trauma skills (62%). CONCLUSION: Compared to Brillman (1995), we found that more programs (99%) are offering formal orientation and allocating more time to them. Lectures remain the most common educational activity. We found increases in the use of skills labs and specialty certifications. We also observed increases in time dedicated to clinical work during orientation. Only a few programs reported engaging in baseline or milestone assessments, an activity that could offer significant benefits to the residency program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5226773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52267732017-01-23 Emergency Medicine Resident Orientation: How Training Programs Get Their Residents Started McGrath, Jillian Barrie, Michael Way, David P. West J Emerg Med Educational Advances INTRODUCTION: The first formal orientation program for incoming emergency medicine (EM) residents was started in 1976. The last attempt to describe the nature of orientation programs was by Brillman in 1995. Now almost all residencies offer orientation to incoming residents, but little is known about the curricular content or structure of these programs. The purpose of this project was to describe the current composition and purpose of EM resident orientation programs in the United States. METHODS: In autumn of 2014, we surveyed all U.S. EM residency program directors (n=167). We adapted our survey instrument from one used by Brillman (1995). The survey was designed to assess the orientation program’s purpose, structure, content, and teaching methods. RESULTS: The survey return rate was 63% (105 of 167). Most respondents (77%) directed three-year residencies, and all but one program offered intern orientation. Orientations lasted an average of nine clinical (Std. Dev.=7.3) and 13 non-clinical days (Std. Dev.=9.3). The prototypical breakdown of program activities was 27% lectures, 23% clinical work, 16% skills training, 10% administrative activities, 9% socialization and 15% other activities. Most orientations included activities to promote socialization among interns (98%) and with other members of the department (91%). Many programs (87%) included special certification courses (ACLS, ATLS, PALS, NRP). Course content included the following: use of electronic medical records (90%), physician wellness (75%), and chief complaint-based lectures (72%). Procedural skill sessions covered ultrasound (94%), airway management (91%), vascular access (90%), wound management (77%), splinting (67%), and trauma skills (62%). CONCLUSION: Compared to Brillman (1995), we found that more programs (99%) are offering formal orientation and allocating more time to them. Lectures remain the most common educational activity. We found increases in the use of skills labs and specialty certifications. We also observed increases in time dedicated to clinical work during orientation. Only a few programs reported engaging in baseline or milestone assessments, an activity that could offer significant benefits to the residency program. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2017-01 2016-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5226773/ /pubmed/28116017 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.10.31275 Text en Copyright: © 2017 McGrath et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Educational Advances
McGrath, Jillian
Barrie, Michael
Way, David P.
Emergency Medicine Resident Orientation: How Training Programs Get Their Residents Started
title Emergency Medicine Resident Orientation: How Training Programs Get Their Residents Started
title_full Emergency Medicine Resident Orientation: How Training Programs Get Their Residents Started
title_fullStr Emergency Medicine Resident Orientation: How Training Programs Get Their Residents Started
title_full_unstemmed Emergency Medicine Resident Orientation: How Training Programs Get Their Residents Started
title_short Emergency Medicine Resident Orientation: How Training Programs Get Their Residents Started
title_sort emergency medicine resident orientation: how training programs get their residents started
topic Educational Advances
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5226773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28116017
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.10.31275
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgrathjillian emergencymedicineresidentorientationhowtrainingprogramsgettheirresidentsstarted
AT barriemichael emergencymedicineresidentorientationhowtrainingprogramsgettheirresidentsstarted
AT waydavidp emergencymedicineresidentorientationhowtrainingprogramsgettheirresidentsstarted