Cargando…
Clinical review: Clinical management of atrial fibrillation – rate control versus rhythm control
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia in the critically ill and is associated with adverse outcomes. Although there are plausible benefits from conversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm (the so-called 'rhythm-control' strategy), recent randomized trials...
Autores principales: | Lim, Hoong Sern, Hamaad, Ali, Lip, Gregory YH |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC522829/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15312210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2827 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Early Rhythm Control Versus Rate Control for Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
por: Kim, Daehoon, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Management of atrial fibrillation
por: Kakar, Puneet, et al.
Publicado: (2007) -
Clinical scores for outcomes of rhythm control or arrhythmia progression in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review
por: Deng, Hai, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Pharmacologic Rate versus Rhythm Control for Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure Patients
por: Koniari, Ioanna, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
The impact of frailty on the management of atrial fibrillation
por: Harrison, Stephanie L., et al.
Publicado: (2023)