Cargando…

Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ: Current evidence and a systemic review

Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (PLCIS) has only recently been identified as a distinct pathological entity within classic lobular carcinoma in situ (CLCIS). As such, there is currently no consensus among clinicians regarding the optimal treatment of this disease. The present study determined...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wazir, Umar, Wazir, Ali, Wells, Clive, Mokbel, Kefah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5228496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28105193
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.5331
_version_ 1782493960705409024
author Wazir, Umar
Wazir, Ali
Wells, Clive
Mokbel, Kefah
author_facet Wazir, Umar
Wazir, Ali
Wells, Clive
Mokbel, Kefah
author_sort Wazir, Umar
collection PubMed
description Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (PLCIS) has only recently been identified as a distinct pathological entity within classic lobular carcinoma in situ (CLCIS). As such, there is currently no consensus among clinicians regarding the optimal treatment of this disease. The present study determined the risk of concomitant invasive disease and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) if PLCIS is observed on core needle biopsy (CNB) and collated the evidence regarding the risk of recurrence in relation to surgical margins and adjuvant therapy. In addition, the pertinent literature available through MedLine, PubMed, the WHO Clinical Trials Registry Platform and Google Scholar using appropriate keywords was reviewed. The pooled results of studies in the literature demonstrated a concomitant presence of invasive disease of 40%, and 15% for DCIS. The studies that examined recurrence rates indicated that the risk is reduced with ample resection margins (>2 mm) and adjuvant radiotherapy. However, recent studies raise concerns regarding breast conservation when pursuing clear margins. No level 1 evidence from prospective studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), or meta-analyses based on such RCTs was identified. This is a clinical issue that warrants investigation in appropriately powered well designed prospective studies for a satisfactory resolution of all concerns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5228496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52284962017-01-19 Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ: Current evidence and a systemic review Wazir, Umar Wazir, Ali Wells, Clive Mokbel, Kefah Oncol Lett Review Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (PLCIS) has only recently been identified as a distinct pathological entity within classic lobular carcinoma in situ (CLCIS). As such, there is currently no consensus among clinicians regarding the optimal treatment of this disease. The present study determined the risk of concomitant invasive disease and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) if PLCIS is observed on core needle biopsy (CNB) and collated the evidence regarding the risk of recurrence in relation to surgical margins and adjuvant therapy. In addition, the pertinent literature available through MedLine, PubMed, the WHO Clinical Trials Registry Platform and Google Scholar using appropriate keywords was reviewed. The pooled results of studies in the literature demonstrated a concomitant presence of invasive disease of 40%, and 15% for DCIS. The studies that examined recurrence rates indicated that the risk is reduced with ample resection margins (>2 mm) and adjuvant radiotherapy. However, recent studies raise concerns regarding breast conservation when pursuing clear margins. No level 1 evidence from prospective studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), or meta-analyses based on such RCTs was identified. This is a clinical issue that warrants investigation in appropriately powered well designed prospective studies for a satisfactory resolution of all concerns. D.A. Spandidos 2016-12 2016-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5228496/ /pubmed/28105193 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.5331 Text en Copyright: © Wazir et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review
Wazir, Umar
Wazir, Ali
Wells, Clive
Mokbel, Kefah
Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ: Current evidence and a systemic review
title Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ: Current evidence and a systemic review
title_full Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ: Current evidence and a systemic review
title_fullStr Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ: Current evidence and a systemic review
title_full_unstemmed Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ: Current evidence and a systemic review
title_short Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ: Current evidence and a systemic review
title_sort pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ: current evidence and a systemic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5228496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28105193
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.5331
work_keys_str_mv AT wazirumar pleomorphiclobularcarcinomainsitucurrentevidenceandasystemicreview
AT wazirali pleomorphiclobularcarcinomainsitucurrentevidenceandasystemicreview
AT wellsclive pleomorphiclobularcarcinomainsitucurrentevidenceandasystemicreview
AT mokbelkefah pleomorphiclobularcarcinomainsitucurrentevidenceandasystemicreview