Cargando…
Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ: Current evidence and a systemic review
Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (PLCIS) has only recently been identified as a distinct pathological entity within classic lobular carcinoma in situ (CLCIS). As such, there is currently no consensus among clinicians regarding the optimal treatment of this disease. The present study determined...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
D.A. Spandidos
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5228496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28105193 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.5331 |
_version_ | 1782493960705409024 |
---|---|
author | Wazir, Umar Wazir, Ali Wells, Clive Mokbel, Kefah |
author_facet | Wazir, Umar Wazir, Ali Wells, Clive Mokbel, Kefah |
author_sort | Wazir, Umar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (PLCIS) has only recently been identified as a distinct pathological entity within classic lobular carcinoma in situ (CLCIS). As such, there is currently no consensus among clinicians regarding the optimal treatment of this disease. The present study determined the risk of concomitant invasive disease and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) if PLCIS is observed on core needle biopsy (CNB) and collated the evidence regarding the risk of recurrence in relation to surgical margins and adjuvant therapy. In addition, the pertinent literature available through MedLine, PubMed, the WHO Clinical Trials Registry Platform and Google Scholar using appropriate keywords was reviewed. The pooled results of studies in the literature demonstrated a concomitant presence of invasive disease of 40%, and 15% for DCIS. The studies that examined recurrence rates indicated that the risk is reduced with ample resection margins (>2 mm) and adjuvant radiotherapy. However, recent studies raise concerns regarding breast conservation when pursuing clear margins. No level 1 evidence from prospective studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), or meta-analyses based on such RCTs was identified. This is a clinical issue that warrants investigation in appropriately powered well designed prospective studies for a satisfactory resolution of all concerns. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5228496 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | D.A. Spandidos |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52284962017-01-19 Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ: Current evidence and a systemic review Wazir, Umar Wazir, Ali Wells, Clive Mokbel, Kefah Oncol Lett Review Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (PLCIS) has only recently been identified as a distinct pathological entity within classic lobular carcinoma in situ (CLCIS). As such, there is currently no consensus among clinicians regarding the optimal treatment of this disease. The present study determined the risk of concomitant invasive disease and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) if PLCIS is observed on core needle biopsy (CNB) and collated the evidence regarding the risk of recurrence in relation to surgical margins and adjuvant therapy. In addition, the pertinent literature available through MedLine, PubMed, the WHO Clinical Trials Registry Platform and Google Scholar using appropriate keywords was reviewed. The pooled results of studies in the literature demonstrated a concomitant presence of invasive disease of 40%, and 15% for DCIS. The studies that examined recurrence rates indicated that the risk is reduced with ample resection margins (>2 mm) and adjuvant radiotherapy. However, recent studies raise concerns regarding breast conservation when pursuing clear margins. No level 1 evidence from prospective studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), or meta-analyses based on such RCTs was identified. This is a clinical issue that warrants investigation in appropriately powered well designed prospective studies for a satisfactory resolution of all concerns. D.A. Spandidos 2016-12 2016-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5228496/ /pubmed/28105193 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.5331 Text en Copyright: © Wazir et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Review Wazir, Umar Wazir, Ali Wells, Clive Mokbel, Kefah Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ: Current evidence and a systemic review |
title | Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ: Current evidence and a systemic review |
title_full | Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ: Current evidence and a systemic review |
title_fullStr | Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ: Current evidence and a systemic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ: Current evidence and a systemic review |
title_short | Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ: Current evidence and a systemic review |
title_sort | pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ: current evidence and a systemic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5228496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28105193 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.5331 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wazirumar pleomorphiclobularcarcinomainsitucurrentevidenceandasystemicreview AT wazirali pleomorphiclobularcarcinomainsitucurrentevidenceandasystemicreview AT wellsclive pleomorphiclobularcarcinomainsitucurrentevidenceandasystemicreview AT mokbelkefah pleomorphiclobularcarcinomainsitucurrentevidenceandasystemicreview |