Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of analgesia-based sedation with remifentanil versus standard hypnotic-based regimens in intensive care unit patients with brain injuries: a randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN50308308]

INTRODUCTION: This randomised, open-label, observational, multicentre, parallel group study assessed the safety and efficacy of analgesia-based sedation using remifentanil in the neuro-intensive care unit. METHODS: Patients aged 18–80 years admitted to the intensive care unit within the previous 24...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karabinis, Andreas, Mandragos, Kostas, Stergiopoulos, Spiros, Komnos, Apostolos, Soukup, Jens, Speelberg, Ben, Kirkham, Andrew JT
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC522854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15312228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2896
_version_ 1782121862476595200
author Karabinis, Andreas
Mandragos, Kostas
Stergiopoulos, Spiros
Komnos, Apostolos
Soukup, Jens
Speelberg, Ben
Kirkham, Andrew JT
author_facet Karabinis, Andreas
Mandragos, Kostas
Stergiopoulos, Spiros
Komnos, Apostolos
Soukup, Jens
Speelberg, Ben
Kirkham, Andrew JT
author_sort Karabinis, Andreas
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This randomised, open-label, observational, multicentre, parallel group study assessed the safety and efficacy of analgesia-based sedation using remifentanil in the neuro-intensive care unit. METHODS: Patients aged 18–80 years admitted to the intensive care unit within the previous 24 hours, with acute brain injury or after neurosurgery, intubated, expected to require mechanical ventilation for 1–5 days and requiring daily downward titration of sedation for assessment of neurological function were studied. Patients received one of two treatment regimens. Regimen one consisted of analgesia-based sedation, in which remifentanil (initial rate 9 μg kg(-1 )h(-1)) was titrated before the addition of a hypnotic agent (propofol [0.5 mg kg(-1 )h(-1)] during days 1–3, midazolam [0.03 mg kg(-1 )h(-1)] during days 4 and 5) (n = 84). Regimen two consisted of hypnotic-based sedation: hypnotic agent (propofol days 1–3; midazolam days 4 and 5) and fentanyl (n = 37) or morphine (n = 40) according to routine clinical practice. For each regimen, agents were titrated to achieve optimal sedation (Sedation–Agitation Scale score 1–3) and analgesia (Pain Intensity score 1–2). RESULTS: Overall, between-patient variability around the time of neurological assessment was statistically significantly smaller when using remifentanil (remifentanil 0.44 versus fentanyl 0.86 [P = 0.024] versus morphine 0.98 [P = 0.006]. Overall, mean neurological assessment times were significantly shorter when using remifentanil (remifentanil 0.41 hour versus fentanyl 0.71 hour [P = 0.001] versus morphine 0.82 hour [P < 0.001]). Patients receiving the remifentanil-based regimen were extubated significantly faster than those treated with morphine (1.0 hour versus 1.93 hour, P = 0.001) but there was no difference between remifentanil and fentanyl. Remifentanil was effective, well tolerated and provided comparable haemodynamic stability to that of the hypnotic-based regimen. Over three times as many users rated analgesia-based sedation with remifentanil as very good or excellent in facilitating assessment of neurological function compared with the hypnotic-based regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Analgesia-based sedation with remifentanil permitted significantly faster and more predictable awakening for neurological assessment. Analgesia-based sedation with remifentanil was very effective, well tolerated and had a similar adverse event and haemodynamic profile to those of hypnotic-based regimens when used in critically ill neuro-intensive care unit patients for up to 5 days.
format Text
id pubmed-522854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-5228542004-10-17 Safety and efficacy of analgesia-based sedation with remifentanil versus standard hypnotic-based regimens in intensive care unit patients with brain injuries: a randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN50308308] Karabinis, Andreas Mandragos, Kostas Stergiopoulos, Spiros Komnos, Apostolos Soukup, Jens Speelberg, Ben Kirkham, Andrew JT Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: This randomised, open-label, observational, multicentre, parallel group study assessed the safety and efficacy of analgesia-based sedation using remifentanil in the neuro-intensive care unit. METHODS: Patients aged 18–80 years admitted to the intensive care unit within the previous 24 hours, with acute brain injury or after neurosurgery, intubated, expected to require mechanical ventilation for 1–5 days and requiring daily downward titration of sedation for assessment of neurological function were studied. Patients received one of two treatment regimens. Regimen one consisted of analgesia-based sedation, in which remifentanil (initial rate 9 μg kg(-1 )h(-1)) was titrated before the addition of a hypnotic agent (propofol [0.5 mg kg(-1 )h(-1)] during days 1–3, midazolam [0.03 mg kg(-1 )h(-1)] during days 4 and 5) (n = 84). Regimen two consisted of hypnotic-based sedation: hypnotic agent (propofol days 1–3; midazolam days 4 and 5) and fentanyl (n = 37) or morphine (n = 40) according to routine clinical practice. For each regimen, agents were titrated to achieve optimal sedation (Sedation–Agitation Scale score 1–3) and analgesia (Pain Intensity score 1–2). RESULTS: Overall, between-patient variability around the time of neurological assessment was statistically significantly smaller when using remifentanil (remifentanil 0.44 versus fentanyl 0.86 [P = 0.024] versus morphine 0.98 [P = 0.006]. Overall, mean neurological assessment times were significantly shorter when using remifentanil (remifentanil 0.41 hour versus fentanyl 0.71 hour [P = 0.001] versus morphine 0.82 hour [P < 0.001]). Patients receiving the remifentanil-based regimen were extubated significantly faster than those treated with morphine (1.0 hour versus 1.93 hour, P = 0.001) but there was no difference between remifentanil and fentanyl. Remifentanil was effective, well tolerated and provided comparable haemodynamic stability to that of the hypnotic-based regimen. Over three times as many users rated analgesia-based sedation with remifentanil as very good or excellent in facilitating assessment of neurological function compared with the hypnotic-based regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Analgesia-based sedation with remifentanil permitted significantly faster and more predictable awakening for neurological assessment. Analgesia-based sedation with remifentanil was very effective, well tolerated and had a similar adverse event and haemodynamic profile to those of hypnotic-based regimens when used in critically ill neuro-intensive care unit patients for up to 5 days. BioMed Central 2004 2004-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC522854/ /pubmed/15312228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2896 Text en
spellingShingle Research
Karabinis, Andreas
Mandragos, Kostas
Stergiopoulos, Spiros
Komnos, Apostolos
Soukup, Jens
Speelberg, Ben
Kirkham, Andrew JT
Safety and efficacy of analgesia-based sedation with remifentanil versus standard hypnotic-based regimens in intensive care unit patients with brain injuries: a randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN50308308]
title Safety and efficacy of analgesia-based sedation with remifentanil versus standard hypnotic-based regimens in intensive care unit patients with brain injuries: a randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN50308308]
title_full Safety and efficacy of analgesia-based sedation with remifentanil versus standard hypnotic-based regimens in intensive care unit patients with brain injuries: a randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN50308308]
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of analgesia-based sedation with remifentanil versus standard hypnotic-based regimens in intensive care unit patients with brain injuries: a randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN50308308]
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of analgesia-based sedation with remifentanil versus standard hypnotic-based regimens in intensive care unit patients with brain injuries: a randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN50308308]
title_short Safety and efficacy of analgesia-based sedation with remifentanil versus standard hypnotic-based regimens in intensive care unit patients with brain injuries: a randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN50308308]
title_sort safety and efficacy of analgesia-based sedation with remifentanil versus standard hypnotic-based regimens in intensive care unit patients with brain injuries: a randomised, controlled trial [isrctn50308308]
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC522854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15312228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2896
work_keys_str_mv AT karabinisandreas safetyandefficacyofanalgesiabasedsedationwithremifentanilversusstandardhypnoticbasedregimensinintensivecareunitpatientswithbraininjuriesarandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn50308308
AT mandragoskostas safetyandefficacyofanalgesiabasedsedationwithremifentanilversusstandardhypnoticbasedregimensinintensivecareunitpatientswithbraininjuriesarandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn50308308
AT stergiopoulosspiros safetyandefficacyofanalgesiabasedsedationwithremifentanilversusstandardhypnoticbasedregimensinintensivecareunitpatientswithbraininjuriesarandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn50308308
AT komnosapostolos safetyandefficacyofanalgesiabasedsedationwithremifentanilversusstandardhypnoticbasedregimensinintensivecareunitpatientswithbraininjuriesarandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn50308308
AT soukupjens safetyandefficacyofanalgesiabasedsedationwithremifentanilversusstandardhypnoticbasedregimensinintensivecareunitpatientswithbraininjuriesarandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn50308308
AT speelbergben safetyandefficacyofanalgesiabasedsedationwithremifentanilversusstandardhypnoticbasedregimensinintensivecareunitpatientswithbraininjuriesarandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn50308308
AT kirkhamandrewjt safetyandefficacyofanalgesiabasedsedationwithremifentanilversusstandardhypnoticbasedregimensinintensivecareunitpatientswithbraininjuriesarandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn50308308