Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of puerarin injection in curing acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicated that the puerarin injection has been widely employed in China for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the puerarin injection for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: A systematic literature search wa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5228693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28072733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005803 |
_version_ | 1782493990063439872 |
---|---|
author | Zheng, Qing-Hua Li, Xiao-Li Mei, Zhi-Gang Xiong, Li Mei, Qing-Xian Wang, Jin-Feng Tan, Ling-Jing Yang, Song-Bai Feng, Zhi-Tao |
author_facet | Zheng, Qing-Hua Li, Xiao-Li Mei, Zhi-Gang Xiong, Li Mei, Qing-Xian Wang, Jin-Feng Tan, Ling-Jing Yang, Song-Bai Feng, Zhi-Tao |
author_sort | Zheng, Qing-Hua |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicated that the puerarin injection has been widely employed in China for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the puerarin injection for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PUBMED, EMBASE, SPRINGER LINK, Scopus, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP Journals Database, Wanfang database and the China Biological Medicine database before November 2016, randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of puerarin injection treating acute ischemic stroke were included. In addition, we searched reference lists of relevant retrieved articles. Two authors extracted data independently. The effective rate, the neurologic deficit score, the blood rheology indexes, and fibrinogen were assessed and analyzed by the Review Manager 5.3 software. The continuous variables were expressed as MD with 95% CI and dichotomous data used RR or ORs. Adverse reactions related to the puerarin injection were also examined. RESULTS: Thirty-five RCTs with a total of 3224 participants were identified in the meta-analysis. The combined results of 32 trials indicated that the puerarin injection was better than control drugs at the clinical effective rate (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.28, P < 0.001) and 16 studies showed the neurological deficit was significantly improved (MD –3.69, 95% CI –4.67 to –2.71, P < 0.001); the hemorheology index and fibrinogen were much lower with the puerarin injection when compared with western conventional medicines (WCM) or other control drugs (the whole blood viscosity: MD –0.89, 95% CI –1.37 to –0.41, P < 0.001; the HCT: MD –0.04, 95% CI –0.06 to –0.02, P < 0.001; the fibrinogen: MD –0.64, 95% CI –0.96 to –0.31, P < 0.001). Eleven trials reported that the adverse reactions related to the puerarin injection included facial flushing, dizziness, vomiting, nausea, and other mild gastrointestinal discomfort and allergic reaction. No serious adverse drug reactions were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Puerarin injection may be more effective and relatively safe in clinic for treating acute ischemic stroke. However, the current evidence is insufficient due to the poor methodological quality and lack of adequate safety data. Further RCTs are required to examine its efficacy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5228693 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52286932017-01-25 Efficacy and safety of puerarin injection in curing acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Zheng, Qing-Hua Li, Xiao-Li Mei, Zhi-Gang Xiong, Li Mei, Qing-Xian Wang, Jin-Feng Tan, Ling-Jing Yang, Song-Bai Feng, Zhi-Tao Medicine (Baltimore) 3800 BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicated that the puerarin injection has been widely employed in China for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the puerarin injection for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PUBMED, EMBASE, SPRINGER LINK, Scopus, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP Journals Database, Wanfang database and the China Biological Medicine database before November 2016, randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of puerarin injection treating acute ischemic stroke were included. In addition, we searched reference lists of relevant retrieved articles. Two authors extracted data independently. The effective rate, the neurologic deficit score, the blood rheology indexes, and fibrinogen were assessed and analyzed by the Review Manager 5.3 software. The continuous variables were expressed as MD with 95% CI and dichotomous data used RR or ORs. Adverse reactions related to the puerarin injection were also examined. RESULTS: Thirty-five RCTs with a total of 3224 participants were identified in the meta-analysis. The combined results of 32 trials indicated that the puerarin injection was better than control drugs at the clinical effective rate (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.28, P < 0.001) and 16 studies showed the neurological deficit was significantly improved (MD –3.69, 95% CI –4.67 to –2.71, P < 0.001); the hemorheology index and fibrinogen were much lower with the puerarin injection when compared with western conventional medicines (WCM) or other control drugs (the whole blood viscosity: MD –0.89, 95% CI –1.37 to –0.41, P < 0.001; the HCT: MD –0.04, 95% CI –0.06 to –0.02, P < 0.001; the fibrinogen: MD –0.64, 95% CI –0.96 to –0.31, P < 0.001). Eleven trials reported that the adverse reactions related to the puerarin injection included facial flushing, dizziness, vomiting, nausea, and other mild gastrointestinal discomfort and allergic reaction. No serious adverse drug reactions were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Puerarin injection may be more effective and relatively safe in clinic for treating acute ischemic stroke. However, the current evidence is insufficient due to the poor methodological quality and lack of adequate safety data. Further RCTs are required to examine its efficacy. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5228693/ /pubmed/28072733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005803 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives License 4.0, which allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 3800 Zheng, Qing-Hua Li, Xiao-Li Mei, Zhi-Gang Xiong, Li Mei, Qing-Xian Wang, Jin-Feng Tan, Ling-Jing Yang, Song-Bai Feng, Zhi-Tao Efficacy and safety of puerarin injection in curing acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title | Efficacy and safety of puerarin injection in curing acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of puerarin injection in curing acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of puerarin injection in curing acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of puerarin injection in curing acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of puerarin injection in curing acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of puerarin injection in curing acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | 3800 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5228693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28072733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005803 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhengqinghua efficacyandsafetyofpuerarininjectionincuringacuteischemicstrokeametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT lixiaoli efficacyandsafetyofpuerarininjectionincuringacuteischemicstrokeametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT meizhigang efficacyandsafetyofpuerarininjectionincuringacuteischemicstrokeametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT xiongli efficacyandsafetyofpuerarininjectionincuringacuteischemicstrokeametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT meiqingxian efficacyandsafetyofpuerarininjectionincuringacuteischemicstrokeametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wangjinfeng efficacyandsafetyofpuerarininjectionincuringacuteischemicstrokeametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT tanlingjing efficacyandsafetyofpuerarininjectionincuringacuteischemicstrokeametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT yangsongbai efficacyandsafetyofpuerarininjectionincuringacuteischemicstrokeametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT fengzhitao efficacyandsafetyofpuerarininjectionincuringacuteischemicstrokeametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |