Cargando…

Inverse relationship between nonadherence to original GOLD treatment guidelines and exacerbations of COPD

BACKGROUND: Prescriber disagreement is among the reasons for poor adherence to COPD treatment guidelines; it is yet not clear whether this leads to adverse outcomes. We tested whether undertreatment according to the original Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines le...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foda, Hussein D, Brehm, Anthony, Goldsteen, Karen, Edelman, Norman H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5230726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28123293
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S119507
_version_ 1782494366465523712
author Foda, Hussein D
Brehm, Anthony
Goldsteen, Karen
Edelman, Norman H
author_facet Foda, Hussein D
Brehm, Anthony
Goldsteen, Karen
Edelman, Norman H
author_sort Foda, Hussein D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prescriber disagreement is among the reasons for poor adherence to COPD treatment guidelines; it is yet not clear whether this leads to adverse outcomes. We tested whether undertreatment according to the original Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines led to increased exacerbations. METHODS: Records of 878 patients with spirometrically confirmed COPD who were followed from 2005 to 2010 at one Veterans Administration (VA) Medical Center were analyzed. Analysis of variance was performed to assess differences in exacerbation rates between severity groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between noncompliance with guidelines and exacerbation rates. FINDINGS: About 19% were appropriately treated by guidelines; 14% overtreated, 44% under-treated, and in 23% treatment did not follow any guideline. Logistic regression revealed a strong inverse relationship between undertreatment and exacerbation rate when severity of obstruction was held constant. Exacerbations per year by GOLD stage were significantly different from each other: mild 0.15, moderate 0.27, severe 0.38, very severe 0.72, and substantially fewer than previously reported. INTERPRETATION: The guidelines were largely not followed. Undertreatment predominated but, contrary to expectations, was associated with fewer exacerbations. Thus, clinicians were likely advancing therapy primarily based upon exacerbation rates as was subsequently recommended in revised GOLD and other more recent guidelines. In retrospect, a substantial lack of prescriber adherence to treatment guidelines may have been a signal that they required re-evaluation. This is likely to be a general principle regarding therapeutic guidelines. The identification of fewer exacerbations in this cohort than has been generally reported probably reflects the comprehensive nature of the VA system, which is more likely to identify relatively asymptomatic (ie, nonexacerbating) COPD patients. Accordingly, these rates may better reflect those in the general population. In addition, the lower rates may reflect the more complete preventive care provided by the VA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5230726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52307262017-01-25 Inverse relationship between nonadherence to original GOLD treatment guidelines and exacerbations of COPD Foda, Hussein D Brehm, Anthony Goldsteen, Karen Edelman, Norman H Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Prescriber disagreement is among the reasons for poor adherence to COPD treatment guidelines; it is yet not clear whether this leads to adverse outcomes. We tested whether undertreatment according to the original Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines led to increased exacerbations. METHODS: Records of 878 patients with spirometrically confirmed COPD who were followed from 2005 to 2010 at one Veterans Administration (VA) Medical Center were analyzed. Analysis of variance was performed to assess differences in exacerbation rates between severity groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between noncompliance with guidelines and exacerbation rates. FINDINGS: About 19% were appropriately treated by guidelines; 14% overtreated, 44% under-treated, and in 23% treatment did not follow any guideline. Logistic regression revealed a strong inverse relationship between undertreatment and exacerbation rate when severity of obstruction was held constant. Exacerbations per year by GOLD stage were significantly different from each other: mild 0.15, moderate 0.27, severe 0.38, very severe 0.72, and substantially fewer than previously reported. INTERPRETATION: The guidelines were largely not followed. Undertreatment predominated but, contrary to expectations, was associated with fewer exacerbations. Thus, clinicians were likely advancing therapy primarily based upon exacerbation rates as was subsequently recommended in revised GOLD and other more recent guidelines. In retrospect, a substantial lack of prescriber adherence to treatment guidelines may have been a signal that they required re-evaluation. This is likely to be a general principle regarding therapeutic guidelines. The identification of fewer exacerbations in this cohort than has been generally reported probably reflects the comprehensive nature of the VA system, which is more likely to identify relatively asymptomatic (ie, nonexacerbating) COPD patients. Accordingly, these rates may better reflect those in the general population. In addition, the lower rates may reflect the more complete preventive care provided by the VA. Dove Medical Press 2017-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5230726/ /pubmed/28123293 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S119507 Text en © 2017 Foda et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Foda, Hussein D
Brehm, Anthony
Goldsteen, Karen
Edelman, Norman H
Inverse relationship between nonadherence to original GOLD treatment guidelines and exacerbations of COPD
title Inverse relationship between nonadherence to original GOLD treatment guidelines and exacerbations of COPD
title_full Inverse relationship between nonadherence to original GOLD treatment guidelines and exacerbations of COPD
title_fullStr Inverse relationship between nonadherence to original GOLD treatment guidelines and exacerbations of COPD
title_full_unstemmed Inverse relationship between nonadherence to original GOLD treatment guidelines and exacerbations of COPD
title_short Inverse relationship between nonadherence to original GOLD treatment guidelines and exacerbations of COPD
title_sort inverse relationship between nonadherence to original gold treatment guidelines and exacerbations of copd
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5230726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28123293
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S119507
work_keys_str_mv AT fodahusseind inverserelationshipbetweennonadherencetooriginalgoldtreatmentguidelinesandexacerbationsofcopd
AT brehmanthony inverserelationshipbetweennonadherencetooriginalgoldtreatmentguidelinesandexacerbationsofcopd
AT goldsteenkaren inverserelationshipbetweennonadherencetooriginalgoldtreatmentguidelinesandexacerbationsofcopd
AT edelmannormanh inverserelationshipbetweennonadherencetooriginalgoldtreatmentguidelinesandexacerbationsofcopd