Cargando…

Beaver Colony Density Trends on the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, 1987 – 2013

The North American beaver (Castor canadensis) is a managed species in the United States. In northern Wisconsin, as part of the state-wide beaver management program, the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest removes beavers from targeted trout streams on U.S. Forest Service lands. However, the success...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ribic, Christine A., Donner, Deahn M., Beck, Albert J., Rugg, David J., Reinecke, Sue, Eklund, Dan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5231324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28081271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170099
_version_ 1782494464857604096
author Ribic, Christine A.
Donner, Deahn M.
Beck, Albert J.
Rugg, David J.
Reinecke, Sue
Eklund, Dan
author_facet Ribic, Christine A.
Donner, Deahn M.
Beck, Albert J.
Rugg, David J.
Reinecke, Sue
Eklund, Dan
author_sort Ribic, Christine A.
collection PubMed
description The North American beaver (Castor canadensis) is a managed species in the United States. In northern Wisconsin, as part of the state-wide beaver management program, the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest removes beavers from targeted trout streams on U.S. Forest Service lands. However, the success of this management program has not been evaluated. Targeted removals comprise only 3% of the annual beaver harvest, a level of effort that may not affect the beaver population. We used colony location data along Forest streams from 1987–2013 (Nicolet, northeast Wisconsin) and 1997–2013 (Chequamegon, northwest Wisconsin) to assess trends in beaver colony density on targeted trout streams compared to non-targeted streams. On the Chequamegon, colony density on non-targeted trout and non-trout streams did not change over time, while colony density on targeted trout streams declined and then stabilized. On the Nicolet, beaver colony density decreased on both non-targeted streams and targeted trout streams. However, colony density on targeted trout streams declined faster. The impact of targeted trapping was similar across the two sides of the Forest (60% reduction relative to non-targeted trout streams). Exploratory analyses of weather influences found that very dry conditions and severe winters were associated with transient reductions in beaver colony density on non-targeted streams on both sides of the Forest. Our findings may help land management agencies weigh more finely calibrated beaver control measures against continued large-scale removal programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5231324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52313242017-01-31 Beaver Colony Density Trends on the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, 1987 – 2013 Ribic, Christine A. Donner, Deahn M. Beck, Albert J. Rugg, David J. Reinecke, Sue Eklund, Dan PLoS One Research Article The North American beaver (Castor canadensis) is a managed species in the United States. In northern Wisconsin, as part of the state-wide beaver management program, the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest removes beavers from targeted trout streams on U.S. Forest Service lands. However, the success of this management program has not been evaluated. Targeted removals comprise only 3% of the annual beaver harvest, a level of effort that may not affect the beaver population. We used colony location data along Forest streams from 1987–2013 (Nicolet, northeast Wisconsin) and 1997–2013 (Chequamegon, northwest Wisconsin) to assess trends in beaver colony density on targeted trout streams compared to non-targeted streams. On the Chequamegon, colony density on non-targeted trout and non-trout streams did not change over time, while colony density on targeted trout streams declined and then stabilized. On the Nicolet, beaver colony density decreased on both non-targeted streams and targeted trout streams. However, colony density on targeted trout streams declined faster. The impact of targeted trapping was similar across the two sides of the Forest (60% reduction relative to non-targeted trout streams). Exploratory analyses of weather influences found that very dry conditions and severe winters were associated with transient reductions in beaver colony density on non-targeted streams on both sides of the Forest. Our findings may help land management agencies weigh more finely calibrated beaver control measures against continued large-scale removal programs. Public Library of Science 2017-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5231324/ /pubmed/28081271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170099 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ribic, Christine A.
Donner, Deahn M.
Beck, Albert J.
Rugg, David J.
Reinecke, Sue
Eklund, Dan
Beaver Colony Density Trends on the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, 1987 – 2013
title Beaver Colony Density Trends on the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, 1987 – 2013
title_full Beaver Colony Density Trends on the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, 1987 – 2013
title_fullStr Beaver Colony Density Trends on the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, 1987 – 2013
title_full_unstemmed Beaver Colony Density Trends on the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, 1987 – 2013
title_short Beaver Colony Density Trends on the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, 1987 – 2013
title_sort beaver colony density trends on the chequamegon-nicolet national forest, 1987 – 2013
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5231324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28081271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170099
work_keys_str_mv AT ribicchristinea beavercolonydensitytrendsonthechequamegonnicoletnationalforest19872013
AT donnerdeahnm beavercolonydensitytrendsonthechequamegonnicoletnationalforest19872013
AT beckalbertj beavercolonydensitytrendsonthechequamegonnicoletnationalforest19872013
AT ruggdavidj beavercolonydensitytrendsonthechequamegonnicoletnationalforest19872013
AT reineckesue beavercolonydensitytrendsonthechequamegonnicoletnationalforest19872013
AT eklunddan beavercolonydensitytrendsonthechequamegonnicoletnationalforest19872013