Cargando…

Measuring Physical Activity with Hip Accelerometry among U.S. Older Adults: How Many Days Are Enough?

INTRODUCTION: Accelerometers are increasingly used in research. Four to 7 days of monitoring is preferred to estimate average activity but may be burdensome for older adults. We aimed to investigate: 1) 7-day accelerometry protocol adherence, 2) demographic predictors of adherence, 3) day of the wee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kocherginsky, Masha, Huisingh-Scheetz, Megan, Dale, William, Lauderdale, Diane S., Waite, Linda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5231361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28081249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170082
_version_ 1782494473163374592
author Kocherginsky, Masha
Huisingh-Scheetz, Megan
Dale, William
Lauderdale, Diane S.
Waite, Linda
author_facet Kocherginsky, Masha
Huisingh-Scheetz, Megan
Dale, William
Lauderdale, Diane S.
Waite, Linda
author_sort Kocherginsky, Masha
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Accelerometers are increasingly used in research. Four to 7 days of monitoring is preferred to estimate average activity but may be burdensome for older adults. We aimed to investigate: 1) 7-day accelerometry protocol adherence, 2) demographic predictors of adherence, 3) day of the week effect, and 4) average activity calculated from 7 versus fewer days among older adults. METHODS: We used the 2003–2006 older adult hip accelerometry data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) sample. We determined proportions with 1–7 valid (10–20 hours) wear days and identified wear day correlates using ordinal logistic regression. We determined the day of week effect on 5 accelerometry measures (counts per minute, CPM; % sedentary behavior; % light-lifestyle activity; % moderate-vigorous activity, MVPA; total activity counts) using multivariate linear regression and compared averages estimated over 2 or 3 versus 7 days using correlations, linear regression, and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Among 2,208 participants aged 65+, 85% of participants had ≥2 and 44% had 7 valid wear days. Increasing age (p = 0.01) and non-white race (p < 0.001) were associated with fewer days. Daily CPM, % MVPA, and total daily activity counts were similar Monday through Saturday, but significantly lower on Sundays (p < 0.001). Daily % sedentary behavior and % light-lifestyle activity were significantly different on Saturdays (p = 0.04–0.045) and Sundays (p < 0.001) compared to weekdays. Among participants with 7 valid days, 2 or 3 day averages were highly correlated with 7 day averages for all 5 accelerometry measures (2 versus 7 days: r = 0.90–0.93, 3 versus 7 days: r = 0.94–0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Protocols of 2–3 days, adjusting for Sundays (average CPM, % moderate-vigorous activity, and average total daily activity counts) or weekends (% sedentary behavior and % light-lifestyle activity), give reliable estimates of older adult activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5231361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52313612017-01-31 Measuring Physical Activity with Hip Accelerometry among U.S. Older Adults: How Many Days Are Enough? Kocherginsky, Masha Huisingh-Scheetz, Megan Dale, William Lauderdale, Diane S. Waite, Linda PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Accelerometers are increasingly used in research. Four to 7 days of monitoring is preferred to estimate average activity but may be burdensome for older adults. We aimed to investigate: 1) 7-day accelerometry protocol adherence, 2) demographic predictors of adherence, 3) day of the week effect, and 4) average activity calculated from 7 versus fewer days among older adults. METHODS: We used the 2003–2006 older adult hip accelerometry data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) sample. We determined proportions with 1–7 valid (10–20 hours) wear days and identified wear day correlates using ordinal logistic regression. We determined the day of week effect on 5 accelerometry measures (counts per minute, CPM; % sedentary behavior; % light-lifestyle activity; % moderate-vigorous activity, MVPA; total activity counts) using multivariate linear regression and compared averages estimated over 2 or 3 versus 7 days using correlations, linear regression, and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Among 2,208 participants aged 65+, 85% of participants had ≥2 and 44% had 7 valid wear days. Increasing age (p = 0.01) and non-white race (p < 0.001) were associated with fewer days. Daily CPM, % MVPA, and total daily activity counts were similar Monday through Saturday, but significantly lower on Sundays (p < 0.001). Daily % sedentary behavior and % light-lifestyle activity were significantly different on Saturdays (p = 0.04–0.045) and Sundays (p < 0.001) compared to weekdays. Among participants with 7 valid days, 2 or 3 day averages were highly correlated with 7 day averages for all 5 accelerometry measures (2 versus 7 days: r = 0.90–0.93, 3 versus 7 days: r = 0.94–0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Protocols of 2–3 days, adjusting for Sundays (average CPM, % moderate-vigorous activity, and average total daily activity counts) or weekends (% sedentary behavior and % light-lifestyle activity), give reliable estimates of older adult activity. Public Library of Science 2017-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5231361/ /pubmed/28081249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170082 Text en © 2017 Kocherginsky et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kocherginsky, Masha
Huisingh-Scheetz, Megan
Dale, William
Lauderdale, Diane S.
Waite, Linda
Measuring Physical Activity with Hip Accelerometry among U.S. Older Adults: How Many Days Are Enough?
title Measuring Physical Activity with Hip Accelerometry among U.S. Older Adults: How Many Days Are Enough?
title_full Measuring Physical Activity with Hip Accelerometry among U.S. Older Adults: How Many Days Are Enough?
title_fullStr Measuring Physical Activity with Hip Accelerometry among U.S. Older Adults: How Many Days Are Enough?
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Physical Activity with Hip Accelerometry among U.S. Older Adults: How Many Days Are Enough?
title_short Measuring Physical Activity with Hip Accelerometry among U.S. Older Adults: How Many Days Are Enough?
title_sort measuring physical activity with hip accelerometry among u.s. older adults: how many days are enough?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5231361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28081249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170082
work_keys_str_mv AT kocherginskymasha measuringphysicalactivitywithhipaccelerometryamongusolderadultshowmanydaysareenough
AT huisinghscheetzmegan measuringphysicalactivitywithhipaccelerometryamongusolderadultshowmanydaysareenough
AT dalewilliam measuringphysicalactivitywithhipaccelerometryamongusolderadultshowmanydaysareenough
AT lauderdaledianes measuringphysicalactivitywithhipaccelerometryamongusolderadultshowmanydaysareenough
AT waitelinda measuringphysicalactivitywithhipaccelerometryamongusolderadultshowmanydaysareenough