Cargando…
Comparison of Microleakage and Penetration Depth between Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Sealants in Primary Second Molar
INTRODUCTION: Optimal pit and fissure sealing is determined by surface preparation techniques and choice of materials. The performance of pit and fissure sealant materials has been intensively investigated, yet no single product is reported as an ideal sealant. In children, moisture control during c...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5233693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28127158 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1380 |
_version_ | 1782494877065412608 |
---|---|
author | Gawali, Pritesh N Chaugule, Vishwas B Panse, Amey M |
author_facet | Gawali, Pritesh N Chaugule, Vishwas B Panse, Amey M |
author_sort | Gawali, Pritesh N |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Optimal pit and fissure sealing is determined by surface preparation techniques and choice of materials. The performance of pit and fissure sealant materials has been intensively investigated, yet no single product is reported as an ideal sealant. In children, moisture control during cavity preparation is always a big challenge, and hence, hydrophilic sealants have been developed. AIM: To compare the microleakage and penetration depth of hydrophilic and hydrophobic sealants using acid-etching on dry and moist surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Recently, extracted 28 2nd primary molars are assigned to two groups (hydrophobic group I; hydrophilic group II) depending on the surface condition (dry group: A1 and B1; moist group: A2 and B2) of 7 teeth in each group. Samples from group A1 and B1 are cleaned and dried with a 3-way syringe and etched with etching gel, and sealant is applied to the fissures and cured with visible light. Sample from A2 and B2 are immersed in 0.1 mL of fresh whole human saliva for 20 seconds and dried using a pellet cotton, and the same procedure is carried out. All samples are subjected to 1000 thermal cycles and sectioned to compare the depth of penetration and microleakage. Sections will be examined under light microscope and analyzed using an image analysis software (SigmaScan). RESULTS: The least microleakage was seen with hydrophilic sealant under moist surface condition, and the depth of penetration of hydrophobic sealant was found to be better than that of hydrophilic sealant in both dry and moist surface conditions. CONCLUSION: Hydrophilic pit and fissure sealants showed higher tolerance to saliva contamination with less microleakage, but in terms of penetration ability hydrophobic sealants were found to be superior. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Gawali PN, Chaugule VB, Panse AM. Comparison of Microleakage and Penetration Depth between Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Sealants in Primary Second Molar. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2016;9(4):291-295. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5233693 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52336932017-01-26 Comparison of Microleakage and Penetration Depth between Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Sealants in Primary Second Molar Gawali, Pritesh N Chaugule, Vishwas B Panse, Amey M Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article INTRODUCTION: Optimal pit and fissure sealing is determined by surface preparation techniques and choice of materials. The performance of pit and fissure sealant materials has been intensively investigated, yet no single product is reported as an ideal sealant. In children, moisture control during cavity preparation is always a big challenge, and hence, hydrophilic sealants have been developed. AIM: To compare the microleakage and penetration depth of hydrophilic and hydrophobic sealants using acid-etching on dry and moist surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Recently, extracted 28 2nd primary molars are assigned to two groups (hydrophobic group I; hydrophilic group II) depending on the surface condition (dry group: A1 and B1; moist group: A2 and B2) of 7 teeth in each group. Samples from group A1 and B1 are cleaned and dried with a 3-way syringe and etched with etching gel, and sealant is applied to the fissures and cured with visible light. Sample from A2 and B2 are immersed in 0.1 mL of fresh whole human saliva for 20 seconds and dried using a pellet cotton, and the same procedure is carried out. All samples are subjected to 1000 thermal cycles and sectioned to compare the depth of penetration and microleakage. Sections will be examined under light microscope and analyzed using an image analysis software (SigmaScan). RESULTS: The least microleakage was seen with hydrophilic sealant under moist surface condition, and the depth of penetration of hydrophobic sealant was found to be better than that of hydrophilic sealant in both dry and moist surface conditions. CONCLUSION: Hydrophilic pit and fissure sealants showed higher tolerance to saliva contamination with less microleakage, but in terms of penetration ability hydrophobic sealants were found to be superior. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Gawali PN, Chaugule VB, Panse AM. Comparison of Microleakage and Penetration Depth between Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Sealants in Primary Second Molar. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2016;9(4):291-295. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2016 2016-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5233693/ /pubmed/28127158 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1380 Text en Copyright © 2016; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gawali, Pritesh N Chaugule, Vishwas B Panse, Amey M Comparison of Microleakage and Penetration Depth between Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Sealants in Primary Second Molar |
title | Comparison of Microleakage and Penetration Depth between Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Sealants in Primary Second Molar |
title_full | Comparison of Microleakage and Penetration Depth between Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Sealants in Primary Second Molar |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Microleakage and Penetration Depth between Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Sealants in Primary Second Molar |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Microleakage and Penetration Depth between Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Sealants in Primary Second Molar |
title_short | Comparison of Microleakage and Penetration Depth between Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Sealants in Primary Second Molar |
title_sort | comparison of microleakage and penetration depth between hydrophilic and hydrophobic sealants in primary second molar |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5233693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28127158 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1380 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gawalipriteshn comparisonofmicroleakageandpenetrationdepthbetweenhydrophilicandhydrophobicsealantsinprimarysecondmolar AT chaugulevishwasb comparisonofmicroleakageandpenetrationdepthbetweenhydrophilicandhydrophobicsealantsinprimarysecondmolar AT panseameym comparisonofmicroleakageandpenetrationdepthbetweenhydrophilicandhydrophobicsealantsinprimarysecondmolar |