Cargando…
Splenic T1-mapping: a novel quantitative method for assessing adenosine stress adequacy for cardiovascular magnetic resonance
BACKGROUND: Perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) performed with inadequate adenosine stress leads to false-negative results and suboptimal clinical management. The recently proposed marker of adequate stress, the “splenic switch-off” sign, detects splenic blood flow attenuation during s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5234250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28081721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0318-2 |
_version_ | 1782494969301303296 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Alexander Wijesurendra, Rohan S. Ariga, Rina Mahmod, Masliza Levelt, Eylem Greiser, Andreas Petrou, Mario Krasopoulos, George Forfar, John C. Kharbanda, Rajesh K. Channon, Keith M. Neubauer, Stefan Piechnik, Stefan K. Ferreira, Vanessa M. |
author_facet | Liu, Alexander Wijesurendra, Rohan S. Ariga, Rina Mahmod, Masliza Levelt, Eylem Greiser, Andreas Petrou, Mario Krasopoulos, George Forfar, John C. Kharbanda, Rajesh K. Channon, Keith M. Neubauer, Stefan Piechnik, Stefan K. Ferreira, Vanessa M. |
author_sort | Liu, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) performed with inadequate adenosine stress leads to false-negative results and suboptimal clinical management. The recently proposed marker of adequate stress, the “splenic switch-off” sign, detects splenic blood flow attenuation during stress perfusion (spleen appears dark), but can only be assessed after gadolinium first-pass, when it is too late to optimize the stress response. Reduction in splenic blood volume during adenosine stress is expected to shorten native splenic T1, which may predict splenic switch-off without the need for gadolinium. METHODS: Two-hundred and twelve subjects underwent adenosine stress CMR: 1.5 T (n = 104; 75 patients, 29 healthy controls); 3 T (n = 108; 86 patients, 22 healthy controls). Native T1(spleen) was assessed using heart-rate-independent ShMOLLI prototype sequence at rest and during adenosine stress (140 μg/kg/min, 4 min, IV) in 3 short-axis slices (basal, mid-ventricular, apical). This was compared with changes in peak splenic perfusion signal intensity (ΔSI(spleen)) and the “splenic switch-off” sign on conventional stress/rest gadolinium perfusion imaging. T1(spleen) values were obtained blinded to perfusion ΔSI(spleen), both were derived using regions of interest carefully placed to avoid artefacts and partial-volume effects. RESULTS: Normal resting splenic T1 values were 1102 ± 66 ms (1.5 T) and 1352 ± 114 ms (3 T), slightly higher than in patients (1083 ± 59 ms, p = 0.04; 1295 ± 105 ms, p = 0.01, respectively). T1(spleen) decreased significantly during adenosine stress (mean ΔT1(spleen) ~ −40 ms), independent of field strength, age, gender, and cardiovascular diseases. While ΔT1(spleen) correlated strongly with ΔSI(spleen) (rho = 0.70, p < 0.0001); neither indices showed significant correlations with conventional hemodynamic markers (rate pressure product) during stress. By ROC analysis, a ΔT1(spleen) threshold of ≥ −30 ms during stress predicted the “splenic switch-off” sign (AUC 0.90, p < 0.0001) with sensitivity (90%), specificity (88%), accuracy (90%), PPV (98%), NPV (42%). CONCLUSIONS: Adenosine stress and rest splenic T1-mapping is a novel method for assessing stress responses, independent of conventional hemodynamic parameters. It enables prediction of the visual “splenic switch-off” sign without the need for gadolinium, and correlates well to changes in splenic signal intensity during stress/rest perfusion imaging. ΔT1(spleen) holds promise to facilitate optimization of stress responses before gadolinium first-pass perfusion CMR. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12968-016-0318-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5234250 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52342502017-01-17 Splenic T1-mapping: a novel quantitative method for assessing adenosine stress adequacy for cardiovascular magnetic resonance Liu, Alexander Wijesurendra, Rohan S. Ariga, Rina Mahmod, Masliza Levelt, Eylem Greiser, Andreas Petrou, Mario Krasopoulos, George Forfar, John C. Kharbanda, Rajesh K. Channon, Keith M. Neubauer, Stefan Piechnik, Stefan K. Ferreira, Vanessa M. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) performed with inadequate adenosine stress leads to false-negative results and suboptimal clinical management. The recently proposed marker of adequate stress, the “splenic switch-off” sign, detects splenic blood flow attenuation during stress perfusion (spleen appears dark), but can only be assessed after gadolinium first-pass, when it is too late to optimize the stress response. Reduction in splenic blood volume during adenosine stress is expected to shorten native splenic T1, which may predict splenic switch-off without the need for gadolinium. METHODS: Two-hundred and twelve subjects underwent adenosine stress CMR: 1.5 T (n = 104; 75 patients, 29 healthy controls); 3 T (n = 108; 86 patients, 22 healthy controls). Native T1(spleen) was assessed using heart-rate-independent ShMOLLI prototype sequence at rest and during adenosine stress (140 μg/kg/min, 4 min, IV) in 3 short-axis slices (basal, mid-ventricular, apical). This was compared with changes in peak splenic perfusion signal intensity (ΔSI(spleen)) and the “splenic switch-off” sign on conventional stress/rest gadolinium perfusion imaging. T1(spleen) values were obtained blinded to perfusion ΔSI(spleen), both were derived using regions of interest carefully placed to avoid artefacts and partial-volume effects. RESULTS: Normal resting splenic T1 values were 1102 ± 66 ms (1.5 T) and 1352 ± 114 ms (3 T), slightly higher than in patients (1083 ± 59 ms, p = 0.04; 1295 ± 105 ms, p = 0.01, respectively). T1(spleen) decreased significantly during adenosine stress (mean ΔT1(spleen) ~ −40 ms), independent of field strength, age, gender, and cardiovascular diseases. While ΔT1(spleen) correlated strongly with ΔSI(spleen) (rho = 0.70, p < 0.0001); neither indices showed significant correlations with conventional hemodynamic markers (rate pressure product) during stress. By ROC analysis, a ΔT1(spleen) threshold of ≥ −30 ms during stress predicted the “splenic switch-off” sign (AUC 0.90, p < 0.0001) with sensitivity (90%), specificity (88%), accuracy (90%), PPV (98%), NPV (42%). CONCLUSIONS: Adenosine stress and rest splenic T1-mapping is a novel method for assessing stress responses, independent of conventional hemodynamic parameters. It enables prediction of the visual “splenic switch-off” sign without the need for gadolinium, and correlates well to changes in splenic signal intensity during stress/rest perfusion imaging. ΔT1(spleen) holds promise to facilitate optimization of stress responses before gadolinium first-pass perfusion CMR. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12968-016-0318-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5234250/ /pubmed/28081721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0318-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Liu, Alexander Wijesurendra, Rohan S. Ariga, Rina Mahmod, Masliza Levelt, Eylem Greiser, Andreas Petrou, Mario Krasopoulos, George Forfar, John C. Kharbanda, Rajesh K. Channon, Keith M. Neubauer, Stefan Piechnik, Stefan K. Ferreira, Vanessa M. Splenic T1-mapping: a novel quantitative method for assessing adenosine stress adequacy for cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
title | Splenic T1-mapping: a novel quantitative method for assessing adenosine stress adequacy for cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
title_full | Splenic T1-mapping: a novel quantitative method for assessing adenosine stress adequacy for cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
title_fullStr | Splenic T1-mapping: a novel quantitative method for assessing adenosine stress adequacy for cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
title_full_unstemmed | Splenic T1-mapping: a novel quantitative method for assessing adenosine stress adequacy for cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
title_short | Splenic T1-mapping: a novel quantitative method for assessing adenosine stress adequacy for cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
title_sort | splenic t1-mapping: a novel quantitative method for assessing adenosine stress adequacy for cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5234250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28081721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0318-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liualexander splenict1mappinganovelquantitativemethodforassessingadenosinestressadequacyforcardiovascularmagneticresonance AT wijesurendrarohans splenict1mappinganovelquantitativemethodforassessingadenosinestressadequacyforcardiovascularmagneticresonance AT arigarina splenict1mappinganovelquantitativemethodforassessingadenosinestressadequacyforcardiovascularmagneticresonance AT mahmodmasliza splenict1mappinganovelquantitativemethodforassessingadenosinestressadequacyforcardiovascularmagneticresonance AT levelteylem splenict1mappinganovelquantitativemethodforassessingadenosinestressadequacyforcardiovascularmagneticresonance AT greiserandreas splenict1mappinganovelquantitativemethodforassessingadenosinestressadequacyforcardiovascularmagneticresonance AT petroumario splenict1mappinganovelquantitativemethodforassessingadenosinestressadequacyforcardiovascularmagneticresonance AT krasopoulosgeorge splenict1mappinganovelquantitativemethodforassessingadenosinestressadequacyforcardiovascularmagneticresonance AT forfarjohnc splenict1mappinganovelquantitativemethodforassessingadenosinestressadequacyforcardiovascularmagneticresonance AT kharbandarajeshk splenict1mappinganovelquantitativemethodforassessingadenosinestressadequacyforcardiovascularmagneticresonance AT channonkeithm splenict1mappinganovelquantitativemethodforassessingadenosinestressadequacyforcardiovascularmagneticresonance AT neubauerstefan splenict1mappinganovelquantitativemethodforassessingadenosinestressadequacyforcardiovascularmagneticresonance AT piechnikstefank splenict1mappinganovelquantitativemethodforassessingadenosinestressadequacyforcardiovascularmagneticresonance AT ferreiravanessam splenict1mappinganovelquantitativemethodforassessingadenosinestressadequacyforcardiovascularmagneticresonance |