Cargando…

Is noncurative gastrectomy always a beneficial strategy for stage IV gastric cancer?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to suggest a treatment strategy for stage IV gastric cancer by investigating the behavioral difference between initially and recurrent metastatic disease. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of the patients who underwent chemotherapy alone for metastatic ga...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Chang Min, Choi, In Keun, Kim, Jong-Han, Park, Da Won, Kim, Jun Suk, Park, Seong-Heum
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Surgical Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5234432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28090502
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2017.92.1.23
_version_ 1782494992104685568
author Lee, Chang Min
Choi, In Keun
Kim, Jong-Han
Park, Da Won
Kim, Jun Suk
Park, Seong-Heum
author_facet Lee, Chang Min
Choi, In Keun
Kim, Jong-Han
Park, Da Won
Kim, Jun Suk
Park, Seong-Heum
author_sort Lee, Chang Min
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to suggest a treatment strategy for stage IV gastric cancer by investigating the behavioral difference between initially and recurrent metastatic disease. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of the patients who underwent chemotherapy alone for metastatic gastric cancer between January 2006 and September 2013. Patients were divided into those who underwent chemotherapy for metastatic disease since initial diagnosis (IM group) and for metastatic recurrence after curative surgery (RM group). Survival and causes of death were compared between the 2 groups, and significant prognostic factors were also investigated. RESULTS: A total of 170 patients were enrolled in this study. Of these patients, 104 were included in the IM group and 66 in the RM group. Overall survival of the IM group did not differ from that of RM (P = 0.569). In the comparison of the causes of death, the IM group had a greater tendency to die from bleeding (P = 0.054) and pneumonia (P = 0.055). In multivariate analysis, bone metastasis (P < 0.001; HR = 2.847), carcinoma peritonei (P = 0.047; HR = 1.766), and the frequency of chemotherapy (P < 0.001; HR = 0.777) were significantly associated with overall survival of IM group. CONCLUSION: Disease-burden mainly contributes to the prognosis of metastatic gastric cancer, although noncurative gastrectomy may be helpful in reducing the mortality of initially metastatic disease. Therefore, disease-burden should be also prioritized in determining the treatment strategies for stage IV gastric cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5234432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Korean Surgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52344322017-01-13 Is noncurative gastrectomy always a beneficial strategy for stage IV gastric cancer? Lee, Chang Min Choi, In Keun Kim, Jong-Han Park, Da Won Kim, Jun Suk Park, Seong-Heum Ann Surg Treat Res Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to suggest a treatment strategy for stage IV gastric cancer by investigating the behavioral difference between initially and recurrent metastatic disease. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of the patients who underwent chemotherapy alone for metastatic gastric cancer between January 2006 and September 2013. Patients were divided into those who underwent chemotherapy for metastatic disease since initial diagnosis (IM group) and for metastatic recurrence after curative surgery (RM group). Survival and causes of death were compared between the 2 groups, and significant prognostic factors were also investigated. RESULTS: A total of 170 patients were enrolled in this study. Of these patients, 104 were included in the IM group and 66 in the RM group. Overall survival of the IM group did not differ from that of RM (P = 0.569). In the comparison of the causes of death, the IM group had a greater tendency to die from bleeding (P = 0.054) and pneumonia (P = 0.055). In multivariate analysis, bone metastasis (P < 0.001; HR = 2.847), carcinoma peritonei (P = 0.047; HR = 1.766), and the frequency of chemotherapy (P < 0.001; HR = 0.777) were significantly associated with overall survival of IM group. CONCLUSION: Disease-burden mainly contributes to the prognosis of metastatic gastric cancer, although noncurative gastrectomy may be helpful in reducing the mortality of initially metastatic disease. Therefore, disease-burden should be also prioritized in determining the treatment strategies for stage IV gastric cancer. The Korean Surgical Society 2017-01 2016-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5234432/ /pubmed/28090502 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2017.92.1.23 Text en Copyright © 2017, the Korean Surgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Chang Min
Choi, In Keun
Kim, Jong-Han
Park, Da Won
Kim, Jun Suk
Park, Seong-Heum
Is noncurative gastrectomy always a beneficial strategy for stage IV gastric cancer?
title Is noncurative gastrectomy always a beneficial strategy for stage IV gastric cancer?
title_full Is noncurative gastrectomy always a beneficial strategy for stage IV gastric cancer?
title_fullStr Is noncurative gastrectomy always a beneficial strategy for stage IV gastric cancer?
title_full_unstemmed Is noncurative gastrectomy always a beneficial strategy for stage IV gastric cancer?
title_short Is noncurative gastrectomy always a beneficial strategy for stage IV gastric cancer?
title_sort is noncurative gastrectomy always a beneficial strategy for stage iv gastric cancer?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5234432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28090502
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2017.92.1.23
work_keys_str_mv AT leechangmin isnoncurativegastrectomyalwaysabeneficialstrategyforstageivgastriccancer
AT choiinkeun isnoncurativegastrectomyalwaysabeneficialstrategyforstageivgastriccancer
AT kimjonghan isnoncurativegastrectomyalwaysabeneficialstrategyforstageivgastriccancer
AT parkdawon isnoncurativegastrectomyalwaysabeneficialstrategyforstageivgastriccancer
AT kimjunsuk isnoncurativegastrectomyalwaysabeneficialstrategyforstageivgastriccancer
AT parkseongheum isnoncurativegastrectomyalwaysabeneficialstrategyforstageivgastriccancer