Cargando…

Comparative study of knowledge about oral cancer among undergraduate dental students

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the knowledge of dental undergraduate students about oral cancer. METHODS: The students were divided into two groups according to semester attended in the undergraduate course: Group A, the first semester; and Group B, seventh semester. They were asked to answer a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: da Silva, Samara Ribeiro, Juliano, Yara, Novo, Neil Ferreira, Weinfeld, Ilan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5234744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27759821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082016AO3729
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the knowledge of dental undergraduate students about oral cancer. METHODS: The students were divided into two groups according to semester attended in the undergraduate course: Group A, the first semester; and Group B, seventh semester. They were asked to answer a questionnaire about epidemiology, risk factors, clinical aspects, therapeutic solutions and oral self-examination. For statistical analysis, the Fisher's exact test, the Cochran's G test and Kendall's concordance test were used, with significance level set at 0.05. RESULTS: Regarding the prevalent sex, only 8.0% of Group A and 56.0% of Group B judged males as the frequent affected by the disease (p=0.0006). In terms of age, 84.0% of the Group B and 44.0% of the Group A estimated that most cases were diagnosed over 40 years (p=0.0072). Smoking was identified as the major risk factor for 64.0% and 91.6% of Groups A and B, respectively (p=0.0110). On issues related to sex, ethnicity, age, risk factors, self-examination, treatment, professional responsible for treatment and profile of an individual with the disease, the seventh-semester showed significantly higher correct answer percentages than first-semester undergraduates. CONCLUSION: There was significant correlation between the right and wrong answers given by first and seventh semester students, making necessary a specific approach directed to their lack of knowledge.