Cargando…

Point-spread function reconstructed PET images of sub-centimeter lesions are not quantitative

BACKGROUND: PET image reconstruction methods include modeling of resolution degrading phenomena, often referred to as point-spread function (PSF) reconstruction. The aim of this study was to develop a clinically relevant phantom and characterize the reproducibility and accuracy of high-resolution PS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munk, O. L., Tolbod, L. P., Hansen, S. B., Bogsrud, T. V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5236043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28091957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-016-0169-9
_version_ 1782495264083279872
author Munk, O. L.
Tolbod, L. P.
Hansen, S. B.
Bogsrud, T. V.
author_facet Munk, O. L.
Tolbod, L. P.
Hansen, S. B.
Bogsrud, T. V.
author_sort Munk, O. L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: PET image reconstruction methods include modeling of resolution degrading phenomena, often referred to as point-spread function (PSF) reconstruction. The aim of this study was to develop a clinically relevant phantom and characterize the reproducibility and accuracy of high-resolution PSF reconstructed images of small lesions, which is a prerequisite for using PET in the prediction and evaluation of responses to treatment. Sets of small homogeneous (18)F-spheres (range 3–12 mm diameter, relevant for small lesions and lymph nodes) were suspended and covered by a (11)C-silicone, which provided a scattering medium and a varying sphere-to-background ratio. Repeated measurements were made on PET/CT scanners from two vendors using a wide range of reconstruction parameters. Recovery coefficients (RCs) were measured for clinically used volume-of-interest definitions. RESULTS: For non-PSF images, RCs were reproducible and fell monotonically as the sphere diameter decreased, which is the expected behavior. PSF images converged slower and had artifacts: RCs did not fall monotonically as sphere diameters decreased but had a maximum RC for sphere sizes around 8 mm, RCs could be greater than 1, and RCs were less reproducible. To some degree, post-reconstruction filters could suppress PSF artifacts. CONCLUSIONS: High-resolution PSF images of small lesions showed artifacts that could lead to serious misinterpretations when used for monitoring treatment response. Thus, it could be safer to use non-PSF reconstruction for quantitative purposes unless PSF reconstruction parameters are optimized for the specific task. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40658-016-0169-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5236043
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52360432017-01-25 Point-spread function reconstructed PET images of sub-centimeter lesions are not quantitative Munk, O. L. Tolbod, L. P. Hansen, S. B. Bogsrud, T. V. EJNMMI Phys Original Research BACKGROUND: PET image reconstruction methods include modeling of resolution degrading phenomena, often referred to as point-spread function (PSF) reconstruction. The aim of this study was to develop a clinically relevant phantom and characterize the reproducibility and accuracy of high-resolution PSF reconstructed images of small lesions, which is a prerequisite for using PET in the prediction and evaluation of responses to treatment. Sets of small homogeneous (18)F-spheres (range 3–12 mm diameter, relevant for small lesions and lymph nodes) were suspended and covered by a (11)C-silicone, which provided a scattering medium and a varying sphere-to-background ratio. Repeated measurements were made on PET/CT scanners from two vendors using a wide range of reconstruction parameters. Recovery coefficients (RCs) were measured for clinically used volume-of-interest definitions. RESULTS: For non-PSF images, RCs were reproducible and fell monotonically as the sphere diameter decreased, which is the expected behavior. PSF images converged slower and had artifacts: RCs did not fall monotonically as sphere diameters decreased but had a maximum RC for sphere sizes around 8 mm, RCs could be greater than 1, and RCs were less reproducible. To some degree, post-reconstruction filters could suppress PSF artifacts. CONCLUSIONS: High-resolution PSF images of small lesions showed artifacts that could lead to serious misinterpretations when used for monitoring treatment response. Thus, it could be safer to use non-PSF reconstruction for quantitative purposes unless PSF reconstruction parameters are optimized for the specific task. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40658-016-0169-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5236043/ /pubmed/28091957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-016-0169-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Munk, O. L.
Tolbod, L. P.
Hansen, S. B.
Bogsrud, T. V.
Point-spread function reconstructed PET images of sub-centimeter lesions are not quantitative
title Point-spread function reconstructed PET images of sub-centimeter lesions are not quantitative
title_full Point-spread function reconstructed PET images of sub-centimeter lesions are not quantitative
title_fullStr Point-spread function reconstructed PET images of sub-centimeter lesions are not quantitative
title_full_unstemmed Point-spread function reconstructed PET images of sub-centimeter lesions are not quantitative
title_short Point-spread function reconstructed PET images of sub-centimeter lesions are not quantitative
title_sort point-spread function reconstructed pet images of sub-centimeter lesions are not quantitative
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5236043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28091957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-016-0169-9
work_keys_str_mv AT munkol pointspreadfunctionreconstructedpetimagesofsubcentimeterlesionsarenotquantitative
AT tolbodlp pointspreadfunctionreconstructedpetimagesofsubcentimeterlesionsarenotquantitative
AT hansensb pointspreadfunctionreconstructedpetimagesofsubcentimeterlesionsarenotquantitative
AT bogsrudtv pointspreadfunctionreconstructedpetimagesofsubcentimeterlesionsarenotquantitative