Cargando…

Efficacy, safety and effectiveness of licensed rotavirus vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis for Latin America and the Caribbean

BACKGROUND: RotaTeq™ (RV5; Merck & Co. Inc., USA) and Rotarix™ (RV1, GlaxoSmithKline, Belgium) vaccines, developed to prevent rotavirus diarrhea in children under five years old, were both introduced into national immunization programs in 2006. As many countries in Latin America and the Caribbea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Velázquez, Raúl F., Linhares, Alexandre C., Muñoz, Sergio, Seron, Pamela, Lorca, Pedro, DeAntonio, Rodrigo, Ortega-Barria, Eduardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5237165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28086819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0771-y
_version_ 1782495477798797312
author Velázquez, Raúl F.
Linhares, Alexandre C.
Muñoz, Sergio
Seron, Pamela
Lorca, Pedro
DeAntonio, Rodrigo
Ortega-Barria, Eduardo
author_facet Velázquez, Raúl F.
Linhares, Alexandre C.
Muñoz, Sergio
Seron, Pamela
Lorca, Pedro
DeAntonio, Rodrigo
Ortega-Barria, Eduardo
author_sort Velázquez, Raúl F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: RotaTeq™ (RV5; Merck & Co. Inc., USA) and Rotarix™ (RV1, GlaxoSmithKline, Belgium) vaccines, developed to prevent rotavirus diarrhea in children under five years old, were both introduced into national immunization programs in 2006. As many countries in Latin America and the Caribbean have included either RV5 or RV1 in their routine childhood vaccination programs, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze efficacy, safety and effectiveness data from the region. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, EMBASE, Scielo, Lilacs and the Cochrane Central Register, for controlled efficacy, safety and effectiveness studies published between January 2000 until December 2011, on RV5 and RV1 across Latin America (where both vaccines are available since 2006). The primary outcome measures were: rotavirus-related gastroenteritis of any severity; rotavirus emergency department visits and hospitalization; and severe adverse events. RESULTS: The results of the meta-analysis for efficacy show that RV1 reduced the risk of any-severity rotavirus-related gastroenteritis by 65% (relative risk (RR) 0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25; 0.50), and of severe gastroenteritis by 82% (RR 0.18, 95%CI 0.12; 0.26) versus placebo. In trials, both vaccines significantly reduced the risk of hospitalization and emergency visits by 85% (RR 0.15, 95%CI 0.09; 0.25) for RV1 and by 90% (RR 0.099, 95%CI 0.012; 0.77) for RV5. Vaccination with RV5 or RV1 did not increase the risk of death, intussusception, or other severe adverse events which were previously associated with the first licensed rotavirus vaccine. Real-world effectiveness studies showed that both vaccines reduced rotavirus hospitalization in the region by around 45–50% for RV5 (for 1 to 3 doses, respectively), and, by around 50–80% for RV1 (for 1 to 2 doses, respectively). For RV1, effectiveness against hospitalization was highest (around 80–96%) for children vaccinated before 12 months of age, compared with 5–60% effectiveness in older children. Both vaccines were most effective in preventing more severe gastroenteritis (70% for RV5 and 80–90% for RV1) and severe gastroenteritis (50% for RV5 and 70–80% for RV1). CONCLUSION: This systematic literature review confirms rotavirus vaccination has been proven effective and well tolerated in protecting children in Latin America and the Caribbean. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12887-016-0771-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5237165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52371652017-01-18 Efficacy, safety and effectiveness of licensed rotavirus vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis for Latin America and the Caribbean Velázquez, Raúl F. Linhares, Alexandre C. Muñoz, Sergio Seron, Pamela Lorca, Pedro DeAntonio, Rodrigo Ortega-Barria, Eduardo BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: RotaTeq™ (RV5; Merck & Co. Inc., USA) and Rotarix™ (RV1, GlaxoSmithKline, Belgium) vaccines, developed to prevent rotavirus diarrhea in children under five years old, were both introduced into national immunization programs in 2006. As many countries in Latin America and the Caribbean have included either RV5 or RV1 in their routine childhood vaccination programs, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze efficacy, safety and effectiveness data from the region. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, EMBASE, Scielo, Lilacs and the Cochrane Central Register, for controlled efficacy, safety and effectiveness studies published between January 2000 until December 2011, on RV5 and RV1 across Latin America (where both vaccines are available since 2006). The primary outcome measures were: rotavirus-related gastroenteritis of any severity; rotavirus emergency department visits and hospitalization; and severe adverse events. RESULTS: The results of the meta-analysis for efficacy show that RV1 reduced the risk of any-severity rotavirus-related gastroenteritis by 65% (relative risk (RR) 0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25; 0.50), and of severe gastroenteritis by 82% (RR 0.18, 95%CI 0.12; 0.26) versus placebo. In trials, both vaccines significantly reduced the risk of hospitalization and emergency visits by 85% (RR 0.15, 95%CI 0.09; 0.25) for RV1 and by 90% (RR 0.099, 95%CI 0.012; 0.77) for RV5. Vaccination with RV5 or RV1 did not increase the risk of death, intussusception, or other severe adverse events which were previously associated with the first licensed rotavirus vaccine. Real-world effectiveness studies showed that both vaccines reduced rotavirus hospitalization in the region by around 45–50% for RV5 (for 1 to 3 doses, respectively), and, by around 50–80% for RV1 (for 1 to 2 doses, respectively). For RV1, effectiveness against hospitalization was highest (around 80–96%) for children vaccinated before 12 months of age, compared with 5–60% effectiveness in older children. Both vaccines were most effective in preventing more severe gastroenteritis (70% for RV5 and 80–90% for RV1) and severe gastroenteritis (50% for RV5 and 70–80% for RV1). CONCLUSION: This systematic literature review confirms rotavirus vaccination has been proven effective and well tolerated in protecting children in Latin America and the Caribbean. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12887-016-0771-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5237165/ /pubmed/28086819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0771-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Velázquez, Raúl F.
Linhares, Alexandre C.
Muñoz, Sergio
Seron, Pamela
Lorca, Pedro
DeAntonio, Rodrigo
Ortega-Barria, Eduardo
Efficacy, safety and effectiveness of licensed rotavirus vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis for Latin America and the Caribbean
title Efficacy, safety and effectiveness of licensed rotavirus vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis for Latin America and the Caribbean
title_full Efficacy, safety and effectiveness of licensed rotavirus vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis for Latin America and the Caribbean
title_fullStr Efficacy, safety and effectiveness of licensed rotavirus vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis for Latin America and the Caribbean
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy, safety and effectiveness of licensed rotavirus vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis for Latin America and the Caribbean
title_short Efficacy, safety and effectiveness of licensed rotavirus vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis for Latin America and the Caribbean
title_sort efficacy, safety and effectiveness of licensed rotavirus vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis for latin america and the caribbean
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5237165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28086819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0771-y
work_keys_str_mv AT velazquezraulf efficacysafetyandeffectivenessoflicensedrotavirusvaccinesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisforlatinamericaandthecaribbean
AT linharesalexandrec efficacysafetyandeffectivenessoflicensedrotavirusvaccinesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisforlatinamericaandthecaribbean
AT munozsergio efficacysafetyandeffectivenessoflicensedrotavirusvaccinesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisforlatinamericaandthecaribbean
AT seronpamela efficacysafetyandeffectivenessoflicensedrotavirusvaccinesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisforlatinamericaandthecaribbean
AT lorcapedro efficacysafetyandeffectivenessoflicensedrotavirusvaccinesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisforlatinamericaandthecaribbean
AT deantoniorodrigo efficacysafetyandeffectivenessoflicensedrotavirusvaccinesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisforlatinamericaandthecaribbean
AT ortegabarriaeduardo efficacysafetyandeffectivenessoflicensedrotavirusvaccinesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisforlatinamericaandthecaribbean