Cargando…
Hemodynamic effects of electrical muscle stimulation in the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis for intensive care unit patients: a randomized trial
BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a major complication in critical care. There are various methods of prophylaxis, but none of them fully prevent DVT, and each method has adverse effects. Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) could be a new effective approach to prevent DVT in intensive care u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5237178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28101364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-016-0206-8 |
_version_ | 1782495480743198720 |
---|---|
author | Ojima, Masahiro Takegawa, Ryosuke Hirose, Tomoya Ohnishi, Mitsuo Shiozaki, Tadahiko Shimazu, Takeshi |
author_facet | Ojima, Masahiro Takegawa, Ryosuke Hirose, Tomoya Ohnishi, Mitsuo Shiozaki, Tadahiko Shimazu, Takeshi |
author_sort | Ojima, Masahiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a major complication in critical care. There are various methods of prophylaxis, but none of them fully prevent DVT, and each method has adverse effects. Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) could be a new effective approach to prevent DVT in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. We hypothesized that EMS increases the venous flow of the lower limbs and has a prophylactic effect against the formation of DVT. METHODS: This study included 26 patients admitted to a single ICU. We enrolled patients who could not move themselves due to spinal cord injury, head injury, central nervous system abnormalities, and sedation for mechanical ventilation. The patients were randomly allocated to either the EMS group or the control group. Patients in the EMS group received 30-min sessions of EMS applied to the bilateral lower extremities on arbitrary days within 14 days after admission. The control patients received no EMS. The peak flow velocity and diameter of the popliteal vein (Pop.V) and common femoral vein (CFV) were measured by ultrasound and then the volumes of venous flow were calculated using a formula. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in patient characteristics between the two groups except for the mortality rate. In the EMS group, the median and interquartile range (IQR, 25th–75th percentile) of velocities of the Pop.V and CFV were higher during EMS compared with at rest: 10.6 (8.0–14.8) vs 24.5 (15.1–37.8) cm/s and 17.0 (12.3–23.8) vs 24.3 (17.0–33.0) cm/s, respectively (p < 0.05). The median (IQR) of volumes of venous flow of the Pop.V and CFV at rest and during EMS were 4.2 (2.7–7.2) vs 8.6 (5.4–16.1) cm(3)/s and 12.9 (9.7–21.4) vs 20.8 (12.3–34.1) cm(3)/s, respectively (p < 0.05). There were no major complications related to EMS. CONCLUSIONS: EMS increased the venous flow of the lower limbs. EMS could be one potential method for venous thromboprophylaxis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000013642 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5237178 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52371782017-01-18 Hemodynamic effects of electrical muscle stimulation in the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis for intensive care unit patients: a randomized trial Ojima, Masahiro Takegawa, Ryosuke Hirose, Tomoya Ohnishi, Mitsuo Shiozaki, Tadahiko Shimazu, Takeshi J Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a major complication in critical care. There are various methods of prophylaxis, but none of them fully prevent DVT, and each method has adverse effects. Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) could be a new effective approach to prevent DVT in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. We hypothesized that EMS increases the venous flow of the lower limbs and has a prophylactic effect against the formation of DVT. METHODS: This study included 26 patients admitted to a single ICU. We enrolled patients who could not move themselves due to spinal cord injury, head injury, central nervous system abnormalities, and sedation for mechanical ventilation. The patients were randomly allocated to either the EMS group or the control group. Patients in the EMS group received 30-min sessions of EMS applied to the bilateral lower extremities on arbitrary days within 14 days after admission. The control patients received no EMS. The peak flow velocity and diameter of the popliteal vein (Pop.V) and common femoral vein (CFV) were measured by ultrasound and then the volumes of venous flow were calculated using a formula. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in patient characteristics between the two groups except for the mortality rate. In the EMS group, the median and interquartile range (IQR, 25th–75th percentile) of velocities of the Pop.V and CFV were higher during EMS compared with at rest: 10.6 (8.0–14.8) vs 24.5 (15.1–37.8) cm/s and 17.0 (12.3–23.8) vs 24.3 (17.0–33.0) cm/s, respectively (p < 0.05). The median (IQR) of volumes of venous flow of the Pop.V and CFV at rest and during EMS were 4.2 (2.7–7.2) vs 8.6 (5.4–16.1) cm(3)/s and 12.9 (9.7–21.4) vs 20.8 (12.3–34.1) cm(3)/s, respectively (p < 0.05). There were no major complications related to EMS. CONCLUSIONS: EMS increased the venous flow of the lower limbs. EMS could be one potential method for venous thromboprophylaxis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000013642 BioMed Central 2017-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5237178/ /pubmed/28101364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-016-0206-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Ojima, Masahiro Takegawa, Ryosuke Hirose, Tomoya Ohnishi, Mitsuo Shiozaki, Tadahiko Shimazu, Takeshi Hemodynamic effects of electrical muscle stimulation in the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis for intensive care unit patients: a randomized trial |
title | Hemodynamic effects of electrical muscle stimulation in the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis for intensive care unit patients: a randomized trial |
title_full | Hemodynamic effects of electrical muscle stimulation in the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis for intensive care unit patients: a randomized trial |
title_fullStr | Hemodynamic effects of electrical muscle stimulation in the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis for intensive care unit patients: a randomized trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Hemodynamic effects of electrical muscle stimulation in the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis for intensive care unit patients: a randomized trial |
title_short | Hemodynamic effects of electrical muscle stimulation in the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis for intensive care unit patients: a randomized trial |
title_sort | hemodynamic effects of electrical muscle stimulation in the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis for intensive care unit patients: a randomized trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5237178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28101364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-016-0206-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ojimamasahiro hemodynamiceffectsofelectricalmusclestimulationintheprophylaxisofdeepveinthrombosisforintensivecareunitpatientsarandomizedtrial AT takegawaryosuke hemodynamiceffectsofelectricalmusclestimulationintheprophylaxisofdeepveinthrombosisforintensivecareunitpatientsarandomizedtrial AT hirosetomoya hemodynamiceffectsofelectricalmusclestimulationintheprophylaxisofdeepveinthrombosisforintensivecareunitpatientsarandomizedtrial AT ohnishimitsuo hemodynamiceffectsofelectricalmusclestimulationintheprophylaxisofdeepveinthrombosisforintensivecareunitpatientsarandomizedtrial AT shiozakitadahiko hemodynamiceffectsofelectricalmusclestimulationintheprophylaxisofdeepveinthrombosisforintensivecareunitpatientsarandomizedtrial AT shimazutakeshi hemodynamiceffectsofelectricalmusclestimulationintheprophylaxisofdeepveinthrombosisforintensivecareunitpatientsarandomizedtrial |