Cargando…

Hemodynamic effects of electrical muscle stimulation in the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis for intensive care unit patients: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a major complication in critical care. There are various methods of prophylaxis, but none of them fully prevent DVT, and each method has adverse effects. Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) could be a new effective approach to prevent DVT in intensive care u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ojima, Masahiro, Takegawa, Ryosuke, Hirose, Tomoya, Ohnishi, Mitsuo, Shiozaki, Tadahiko, Shimazu, Takeshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5237178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28101364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-016-0206-8
_version_ 1782495480743198720
author Ojima, Masahiro
Takegawa, Ryosuke
Hirose, Tomoya
Ohnishi, Mitsuo
Shiozaki, Tadahiko
Shimazu, Takeshi
author_facet Ojima, Masahiro
Takegawa, Ryosuke
Hirose, Tomoya
Ohnishi, Mitsuo
Shiozaki, Tadahiko
Shimazu, Takeshi
author_sort Ojima, Masahiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a major complication in critical care. There are various methods of prophylaxis, but none of them fully prevent DVT, and each method has adverse effects. Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) could be a new effective approach to prevent DVT in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. We hypothesized that EMS increases the venous flow of the lower limbs and has a prophylactic effect against the formation of DVT. METHODS: This study included 26 patients admitted to a single ICU. We enrolled patients who could not move themselves due to spinal cord injury, head injury, central nervous system abnormalities, and sedation for mechanical ventilation. The patients were randomly allocated to either the EMS group or the control group. Patients in the EMS group received 30-min sessions of EMS applied to the bilateral lower extremities on arbitrary days within 14 days after admission. The control patients received no EMS. The peak flow velocity and diameter of the popliteal vein (Pop.V) and common femoral vein (CFV) were measured by ultrasound and then the volumes of venous flow were calculated using a formula. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in patient characteristics between the two groups except for the mortality rate. In the EMS group, the median and interquartile range (IQR, 25th–75th percentile) of velocities of the Pop.V and CFV were higher during EMS compared with at rest: 10.6 (8.0–14.8) vs 24.5 (15.1–37.8) cm/s and 17.0 (12.3–23.8) vs 24.3 (17.0–33.0) cm/s, respectively (p < 0.05). The median (IQR) of volumes of venous flow of the Pop.V and CFV at rest and during EMS were 4.2 (2.7–7.2) vs 8.6 (5.4–16.1) cm(3)/s and 12.9 (9.7–21.4) vs 20.8 (12.3–34.1) cm(3)/s, respectively (p < 0.05). There were no major complications related to EMS. CONCLUSIONS: EMS increased the venous flow of the lower limbs. EMS could be one potential method for venous thromboprophylaxis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000013642
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5237178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52371782017-01-18 Hemodynamic effects of electrical muscle stimulation in the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis for intensive care unit patients: a randomized trial Ojima, Masahiro Takegawa, Ryosuke Hirose, Tomoya Ohnishi, Mitsuo Shiozaki, Tadahiko Shimazu, Takeshi J Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a major complication in critical care. There are various methods of prophylaxis, but none of them fully prevent DVT, and each method has adverse effects. Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) could be a new effective approach to prevent DVT in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. We hypothesized that EMS increases the venous flow of the lower limbs and has a prophylactic effect against the formation of DVT. METHODS: This study included 26 patients admitted to a single ICU. We enrolled patients who could not move themselves due to spinal cord injury, head injury, central nervous system abnormalities, and sedation for mechanical ventilation. The patients were randomly allocated to either the EMS group or the control group. Patients in the EMS group received 30-min sessions of EMS applied to the bilateral lower extremities on arbitrary days within 14 days after admission. The control patients received no EMS. The peak flow velocity and diameter of the popliteal vein (Pop.V) and common femoral vein (CFV) were measured by ultrasound and then the volumes of venous flow were calculated using a formula. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in patient characteristics between the two groups except for the mortality rate. In the EMS group, the median and interquartile range (IQR, 25th–75th percentile) of velocities of the Pop.V and CFV were higher during EMS compared with at rest: 10.6 (8.0–14.8) vs 24.5 (15.1–37.8) cm/s and 17.0 (12.3–23.8) vs 24.3 (17.0–33.0) cm/s, respectively (p < 0.05). The median (IQR) of volumes of venous flow of the Pop.V and CFV at rest and during EMS were 4.2 (2.7–7.2) vs 8.6 (5.4–16.1) cm(3)/s and 12.9 (9.7–21.4) vs 20.8 (12.3–34.1) cm(3)/s, respectively (p < 0.05). There were no major complications related to EMS. CONCLUSIONS: EMS increased the venous flow of the lower limbs. EMS could be one potential method for venous thromboprophylaxis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000013642 BioMed Central 2017-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5237178/ /pubmed/28101364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-016-0206-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Ojima, Masahiro
Takegawa, Ryosuke
Hirose, Tomoya
Ohnishi, Mitsuo
Shiozaki, Tadahiko
Shimazu, Takeshi
Hemodynamic effects of electrical muscle stimulation in the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis for intensive care unit patients: a randomized trial
title Hemodynamic effects of electrical muscle stimulation in the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis for intensive care unit patients: a randomized trial
title_full Hemodynamic effects of electrical muscle stimulation in the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis for intensive care unit patients: a randomized trial
title_fullStr Hemodynamic effects of electrical muscle stimulation in the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis for intensive care unit patients: a randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Hemodynamic effects of electrical muscle stimulation in the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis for intensive care unit patients: a randomized trial
title_short Hemodynamic effects of electrical muscle stimulation in the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis for intensive care unit patients: a randomized trial
title_sort hemodynamic effects of electrical muscle stimulation in the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis for intensive care unit patients: a randomized trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5237178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28101364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-016-0206-8
work_keys_str_mv AT ojimamasahiro hemodynamiceffectsofelectricalmusclestimulationintheprophylaxisofdeepveinthrombosisforintensivecareunitpatientsarandomizedtrial
AT takegawaryosuke hemodynamiceffectsofelectricalmusclestimulationintheprophylaxisofdeepveinthrombosisforintensivecareunitpatientsarandomizedtrial
AT hirosetomoya hemodynamiceffectsofelectricalmusclestimulationintheprophylaxisofdeepveinthrombosisforintensivecareunitpatientsarandomizedtrial
AT ohnishimitsuo hemodynamiceffectsofelectricalmusclestimulationintheprophylaxisofdeepveinthrombosisforintensivecareunitpatientsarandomizedtrial
AT shiozakitadahiko hemodynamiceffectsofelectricalmusclestimulationintheprophylaxisofdeepveinthrombosisforintensivecareunitpatientsarandomizedtrial
AT shimazutakeshi hemodynamiceffectsofelectricalmusclestimulationintheprophylaxisofdeepveinthrombosisforintensivecareunitpatientsarandomizedtrial