Cargando…

Ovarian cancer: density equalizing mapping of the global research architecture

BACKGROUND: Despite its impact on female health worldwide, no efforts have been made to depict the global architecture of ovarian cancer research and to understand the trends in the related literature. Hence, it was the objective of this study to assess the global scientific performance chronologica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brüggmann, Dörthe, Pulch, Katharina, Klingelhöfer, Doris, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Groneberg, David A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5237222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28086974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-016-0076-2
_version_ 1782495490568355840
author Brüggmann, Dörthe
Pulch, Katharina
Klingelhöfer, Doris
Pearce, Celeste Leigh
Groneberg, David A.
author_facet Brüggmann, Dörthe
Pulch, Katharina
Klingelhöfer, Doris
Pearce, Celeste Leigh
Groneberg, David A.
author_sort Brüggmann, Dörthe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite its impact on female health worldwide, no efforts have been made to depict the global architecture of ovarian cancer research and to understand the trends in the related literature. Hence, it was the objective of this study to assess the global scientific performance chronologically, geographically and in regards to economic benchmarks using bibliometric tools and density equalizing map projections. METHODS: The NewQIS platform was employed to identify all ovarian cancer related articles published in the Web of Science since 1900. The items were analyzed regarding quantitative aspects (e.g. publication date, country of origin) and parameters describing the recognition of the work by the scientific community (e.g. citation rates). RESULTS: 23,378 articles on ovarian cancer were analyzed. The USA had the highest activity of ovarian cancer research with a total of n = 9312 ovarian cancer-specific publications, followed by the UK (n = 1900), China (n = 1813), Germany (n = 1717) and Japan (n = 1673). Ovarian cancer-specific country h-index also showed a leading position of the USA with an h-index (HI) of 207, followed by the UK (HI = 122), Canada (HI = 99), Italy (HI = 97), Germany (HI = 84), and Japan (HI = 81). In the socio-economic analysis, the USA were ranked first with an average of 175.6 ovarian cancer-related publications per GDP per capita in 1000 US-$, followed by Italy with an index level of 46.85, the UK with 45.48, and Japan with 43.3. Overall, the USA and Western European nations, China and Japan constituted the scientific power players publishing the majority of highly cited ovarian cancer-related articles and dominated international collaborative efforts. African, Asian and South American countries played almost no visible role in the scientific community. CONCLUSIONS: The quantity and scientific recognition of publications related to ovarian cancer are continuously increasing. The research endeavors in the field are concentrated in high-income countries with no involvement of lower-resource nations. Hence, worldwide collaborative efforts with the aim to exchange epidemiologic data, resources and knowledge have to be strengthened in the future to successfully alleviate the global burden related to ovarian cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12942-016-0076-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5237222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52372222017-01-18 Ovarian cancer: density equalizing mapping of the global research architecture Brüggmann, Dörthe Pulch, Katharina Klingelhöfer, Doris Pearce, Celeste Leigh Groneberg, David A. Int J Health Geogr Research BACKGROUND: Despite its impact on female health worldwide, no efforts have been made to depict the global architecture of ovarian cancer research and to understand the trends in the related literature. Hence, it was the objective of this study to assess the global scientific performance chronologically, geographically and in regards to economic benchmarks using bibliometric tools and density equalizing map projections. METHODS: The NewQIS platform was employed to identify all ovarian cancer related articles published in the Web of Science since 1900. The items were analyzed regarding quantitative aspects (e.g. publication date, country of origin) and parameters describing the recognition of the work by the scientific community (e.g. citation rates). RESULTS: 23,378 articles on ovarian cancer were analyzed. The USA had the highest activity of ovarian cancer research with a total of n = 9312 ovarian cancer-specific publications, followed by the UK (n = 1900), China (n = 1813), Germany (n = 1717) and Japan (n = 1673). Ovarian cancer-specific country h-index also showed a leading position of the USA with an h-index (HI) of 207, followed by the UK (HI = 122), Canada (HI = 99), Italy (HI = 97), Germany (HI = 84), and Japan (HI = 81). In the socio-economic analysis, the USA were ranked first with an average of 175.6 ovarian cancer-related publications per GDP per capita in 1000 US-$, followed by Italy with an index level of 46.85, the UK with 45.48, and Japan with 43.3. Overall, the USA and Western European nations, China and Japan constituted the scientific power players publishing the majority of highly cited ovarian cancer-related articles and dominated international collaborative efforts. African, Asian and South American countries played almost no visible role in the scientific community. CONCLUSIONS: The quantity and scientific recognition of publications related to ovarian cancer are continuously increasing. The research endeavors in the field are concentrated in high-income countries with no involvement of lower-resource nations. Hence, worldwide collaborative efforts with the aim to exchange epidemiologic data, resources and knowledge have to be strengthened in the future to successfully alleviate the global burden related to ovarian cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12942-016-0076-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5237222/ /pubmed/28086974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-016-0076-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Brüggmann, Dörthe
Pulch, Katharina
Klingelhöfer, Doris
Pearce, Celeste Leigh
Groneberg, David A.
Ovarian cancer: density equalizing mapping of the global research architecture
title Ovarian cancer: density equalizing mapping of the global research architecture
title_full Ovarian cancer: density equalizing mapping of the global research architecture
title_fullStr Ovarian cancer: density equalizing mapping of the global research architecture
title_full_unstemmed Ovarian cancer: density equalizing mapping of the global research architecture
title_short Ovarian cancer: density equalizing mapping of the global research architecture
title_sort ovarian cancer: density equalizing mapping of the global research architecture
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5237222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28086974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-016-0076-2
work_keys_str_mv AT bruggmanndorthe ovariancancerdensityequalizingmappingoftheglobalresearcharchitecture
AT pulchkatharina ovariancancerdensityequalizingmappingoftheglobalresearcharchitecture
AT klingelhoferdoris ovariancancerdensityequalizingmappingoftheglobalresearcharchitecture
AT pearcecelesteleigh ovariancancerdensityequalizingmappingoftheglobalresearcharchitecture
AT gronebergdavida ovariancancerdensityequalizingmappingoftheglobalresearcharchitecture