Cargando…
Behaviour change interventions to influence antimicrobial prescribing: a cross-sectional analysis of reports from UK state-of-the-art scientific conferences
BACKGROUND: To improve the quality of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions the application of behavioural sciences supported by multidisciplinary collaboration has been recommended. We analysed major UK scientific research conferences to investigate AMS behaviour change intervention reporti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5237267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28101333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-017-0170-7 |
_version_ | 1782495500624199680 |
---|---|
author | Rawson, T. M. Moore, L. S. P. Tivey, A. M. Tsao, A. Gilchrist, M. Charani, E. Holmes, A. H. |
author_facet | Rawson, T. M. Moore, L. S. P. Tivey, A. M. Tsao, A. Gilchrist, M. Charani, E. Holmes, A. H. |
author_sort | Rawson, T. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To improve the quality of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions the application of behavioural sciences supported by multidisciplinary collaboration has been recommended. We analysed major UK scientific research conferences to investigate AMS behaviour change intervention reporting. METHODS: Leading UK 2015 scientific conference abstracts for 30 clinical specialties were identified and interrogated. All AMS and/or antimicrobial resistance(AMR) abstracts were identified using validated search criteria. Abstracts were independently reviewed by four researchers with reported behavioural interventions classified using a behaviour change taxonomy. RESULTS: Conferences ran for 110 days with >57,000 delegates. 311/12,313(2.5%) AMS-AMR abstracts (oral and poster) were identified. 118/311(40%) were presented at the UK’s infectious diseases/microbiology conference. 56/311(18%) AMS-AMR abstracts described behaviour change interventions. These were identified across 12/30(40%) conferences. The commonest abstract reporting behaviour change interventions were quality improvement projects [44/56 (79%)]. In total 71 unique behaviour change functions were identified. Policy categories; “guidelines” (16/71) and “service provision” (11/71) were the most frequently reported. Intervention functions; “education” (6/71), “persuasion” (7/71), and “enablement” (9/71) were also common. Only infection and primary care conferences reported studies that contained multiple behaviour change interventions. The remaining 10 specialties tended to report a narrow range of interventions focusing on “guidelines” and “enablement”. CONCLUSION: Despite the benefits of behaviour change interventions on antimicrobial prescribing, very few AMS-AMR studies reported implementing them in 2015. AMS interventions must focus on promoting behaviour change towards antimicrobial prescribing. Greater focus must be placed on non-infection specialties to engage with the issue of behaviour change towards antimicrobial use. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13756-017-0170-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5237267 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52372672017-01-18 Behaviour change interventions to influence antimicrobial prescribing: a cross-sectional analysis of reports from UK state-of-the-art scientific conferences Rawson, T. M. Moore, L. S. P. Tivey, A. M. Tsao, A. Gilchrist, M. Charani, E. Holmes, A. H. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: To improve the quality of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions the application of behavioural sciences supported by multidisciplinary collaboration has been recommended. We analysed major UK scientific research conferences to investigate AMS behaviour change intervention reporting. METHODS: Leading UK 2015 scientific conference abstracts for 30 clinical specialties were identified and interrogated. All AMS and/or antimicrobial resistance(AMR) abstracts were identified using validated search criteria. Abstracts were independently reviewed by four researchers with reported behavioural interventions classified using a behaviour change taxonomy. RESULTS: Conferences ran for 110 days with >57,000 delegates. 311/12,313(2.5%) AMS-AMR abstracts (oral and poster) were identified. 118/311(40%) were presented at the UK’s infectious diseases/microbiology conference. 56/311(18%) AMS-AMR abstracts described behaviour change interventions. These were identified across 12/30(40%) conferences. The commonest abstract reporting behaviour change interventions were quality improvement projects [44/56 (79%)]. In total 71 unique behaviour change functions were identified. Policy categories; “guidelines” (16/71) and “service provision” (11/71) were the most frequently reported. Intervention functions; “education” (6/71), “persuasion” (7/71), and “enablement” (9/71) were also common. Only infection and primary care conferences reported studies that contained multiple behaviour change interventions. The remaining 10 specialties tended to report a narrow range of interventions focusing on “guidelines” and “enablement”. CONCLUSION: Despite the benefits of behaviour change interventions on antimicrobial prescribing, very few AMS-AMR studies reported implementing them in 2015. AMS interventions must focus on promoting behaviour change towards antimicrobial prescribing. Greater focus must be placed on non-infection specialties to engage with the issue of behaviour change towards antimicrobial use. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13756-017-0170-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5237267/ /pubmed/28101333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-017-0170-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Rawson, T. M. Moore, L. S. P. Tivey, A. M. Tsao, A. Gilchrist, M. Charani, E. Holmes, A. H. Behaviour change interventions to influence antimicrobial prescribing: a cross-sectional analysis of reports from UK state-of-the-art scientific conferences |
title | Behaviour change interventions to influence antimicrobial prescribing: a cross-sectional analysis of reports from UK state-of-the-art scientific conferences |
title_full | Behaviour change interventions to influence antimicrobial prescribing: a cross-sectional analysis of reports from UK state-of-the-art scientific conferences |
title_fullStr | Behaviour change interventions to influence antimicrobial prescribing: a cross-sectional analysis of reports from UK state-of-the-art scientific conferences |
title_full_unstemmed | Behaviour change interventions to influence antimicrobial prescribing: a cross-sectional analysis of reports from UK state-of-the-art scientific conferences |
title_short | Behaviour change interventions to influence antimicrobial prescribing: a cross-sectional analysis of reports from UK state-of-the-art scientific conferences |
title_sort | behaviour change interventions to influence antimicrobial prescribing: a cross-sectional analysis of reports from uk state-of-the-art scientific conferences |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5237267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28101333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-017-0170-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rawsontm behaviourchangeinterventionstoinfluenceantimicrobialprescribingacrosssectionalanalysisofreportsfromukstateoftheartscientificconferences AT moorelsp behaviourchangeinterventionstoinfluenceantimicrobialprescribingacrosssectionalanalysisofreportsfromukstateoftheartscientificconferences AT tiveyam behaviourchangeinterventionstoinfluenceantimicrobialprescribingacrosssectionalanalysisofreportsfromukstateoftheartscientificconferences AT tsaoa behaviourchangeinterventionstoinfluenceantimicrobialprescribingacrosssectionalanalysisofreportsfromukstateoftheartscientificconferences AT gilchristm behaviourchangeinterventionstoinfluenceantimicrobialprescribingacrosssectionalanalysisofreportsfromukstateoftheartscientificconferences AT charanie behaviourchangeinterventionstoinfluenceantimicrobialprescribingacrosssectionalanalysisofreportsfromukstateoftheartscientificconferences AT holmesah behaviourchangeinterventionstoinfluenceantimicrobialprescribingacrosssectionalanalysisofreportsfromukstateoftheartscientificconferences |