Cargando…

Validity evidence for two objective structured clinical examination stations to evaluate core skills of the shoulder and knee assessment

BACKGROUND: We developed two objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) to educate and evaluate trainees in the evaluation and management of shoulder and knee pain. Our objective was to examine the evidence for validity of these OSCEs. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team of content experts dev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Battistone, Michael J., Barker, Andrea M., Beck, J. Peter, Tashjian, Robert Z., Cannon, Grant W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5237332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28086879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0850-7
_version_ 1782495515115520000
author Battistone, Michael J.
Barker, Andrea M.
Beck, J. Peter
Tashjian, Robert Z.
Cannon, Grant W.
author_facet Battistone, Michael J.
Barker, Andrea M.
Beck, J. Peter
Tashjian, Robert Z.
Cannon, Grant W.
author_sort Battistone, Michael J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We developed two objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) to educate and evaluate trainees in the evaluation and management of shoulder and knee pain. Our objective was to examine the evidence for validity of these OSCEs. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team of content experts developed checklists of exam maneuvers and criteria to guide rater observations. Content was proposed by faculty, supplemented by literature review, and finalized using a Delphi process. One faculty simulated the patient, another rated examinee performance. Two faculty independently rated a portion of cases. Percent agreement was calculated and Cohen’s kappa corrected for chance agreement on binary outcomes. Examinees’ self-assessment was explored by written surveys. Responses were stratified into 3 categories and compared with similarly stratified OSCE scores using Pearson’s coefficient. RESULTS: A multi-disciplinary cohort of 69 examinees participated. Examinees correctly identified rotator cuff and meniscal disease 88% and 89% of the time, respectively. Inter-rater agreement was moderate for the knee (87%; k = 0.61) and near perfect for the shoulder (97%; k = 0.88). No correlation between stratified self-assessment and OSCE scores were found for either shoulder (0.02) or knee (−0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Validity evidence supports the continuing use of these OSCEs in educational programs addressing the evaluation and management of shoulder and knee pain. Evidence for validity includes the systematic development of content, rigorous control of the response process, and demonstration of acceptable interrater agreement. Lack of correlation with self-assessment suggests that these OSCEs measure a construct different from learners’ self-confidence. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0850-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5237332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52373322017-01-18 Validity evidence for two objective structured clinical examination stations to evaluate core skills of the shoulder and knee assessment Battistone, Michael J. Barker, Andrea M. Beck, J. Peter Tashjian, Robert Z. Cannon, Grant W. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: We developed two objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) to educate and evaluate trainees in the evaluation and management of shoulder and knee pain. Our objective was to examine the evidence for validity of these OSCEs. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team of content experts developed checklists of exam maneuvers and criteria to guide rater observations. Content was proposed by faculty, supplemented by literature review, and finalized using a Delphi process. One faculty simulated the patient, another rated examinee performance. Two faculty independently rated a portion of cases. Percent agreement was calculated and Cohen’s kappa corrected for chance agreement on binary outcomes. Examinees’ self-assessment was explored by written surveys. Responses were stratified into 3 categories and compared with similarly stratified OSCE scores using Pearson’s coefficient. RESULTS: A multi-disciplinary cohort of 69 examinees participated. Examinees correctly identified rotator cuff and meniscal disease 88% and 89% of the time, respectively. Inter-rater agreement was moderate for the knee (87%; k = 0.61) and near perfect for the shoulder (97%; k = 0.88). No correlation between stratified self-assessment and OSCE scores were found for either shoulder (0.02) or knee (−0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Validity evidence supports the continuing use of these OSCEs in educational programs addressing the evaluation and management of shoulder and knee pain. Evidence for validity includes the systematic development of content, rigorous control of the response process, and demonstration of acceptable interrater agreement. Lack of correlation with self-assessment suggests that these OSCEs measure a construct different from learners’ self-confidence. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0850-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5237332/ /pubmed/28086879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0850-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Battistone, Michael J.
Barker, Andrea M.
Beck, J. Peter
Tashjian, Robert Z.
Cannon, Grant W.
Validity evidence for two objective structured clinical examination stations to evaluate core skills of the shoulder and knee assessment
title Validity evidence for two objective structured clinical examination stations to evaluate core skills of the shoulder and knee assessment
title_full Validity evidence for two objective structured clinical examination stations to evaluate core skills of the shoulder and knee assessment
title_fullStr Validity evidence for two objective structured clinical examination stations to evaluate core skills of the shoulder and knee assessment
title_full_unstemmed Validity evidence for two objective structured clinical examination stations to evaluate core skills of the shoulder and knee assessment
title_short Validity evidence for two objective structured clinical examination stations to evaluate core skills of the shoulder and knee assessment
title_sort validity evidence for two objective structured clinical examination stations to evaluate core skills of the shoulder and knee assessment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5237332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28086879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0850-7
work_keys_str_mv AT battistonemichaelj validityevidencefortwoobjectivestructuredclinicalexaminationstationstoevaluatecoreskillsoftheshoulderandkneeassessment
AT barkerandream validityevidencefortwoobjectivestructuredclinicalexaminationstationstoevaluatecoreskillsoftheshoulderandkneeassessment
AT beckjpeter validityevidencefortwoobjectivestructuredclinicalexaminationstationstoevaluatecoreskillsoftheshoulderandkneeassessment
AT tashjianrobertz validityevidencefortwoobjectivestructuredclinicalexaminationstationstoevaluatecoreskillsoftheshoulderandkneeassessment
AT cannongrantw validityevidencefortwoobjectivestructuredclinicalexaminationstationstoevaluatecoreskillsoftheshoulderandkneeassessment