Cargando…

Reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) RCT

BACKGROUND: Reducing sedentary behaviour may have important health implications. This study evaluated the potential enablers and barriers for outcomes of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate a pragmatic education based intervention designed to reduce sedentary (sitting) behaviour...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biddle, Stuart J. H., Edwardson, Charlotte L., Gorely, Trish, Wilmot, Emma G., Yates, Thomas, Nimmo, Myra A., Khunti, Kamlesh, Davies, Melanie J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5237565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28088243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3941-9
_version_ 1782495552767787008
author Biddle, Stuart J. H.
Edwardson, Charlotte L.
Gorely, Trish
Wilmot, Emma G.
Yates, Thomas
Nimmo, Myra A.
Khunti, Kamlesh
Davies, Melanie J.
author_facet Biddle, Stuart J. H.
Edwardson, Charlotte L.
Gorely, Trish
Wilmot, Emma G.
Yates, Thomas
Nimmo, Myra A.
Khunti, Kamlesh
Davies, Melanie J.
author_sort Biddle, Stuart J. H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reducing sedentary behaviour may have important health implications. This study evaluated the potential enablers and barriers for outcomes of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate a pragmatic education based intervention designed to reduce sedentary (sitting) behaviour in young adults at high risk of type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Data were collected from participants in the intervention group immediately after an educational workshop addressing sedentary time and diabetes risk (n = 71), through phone interviews 6 weeks (n = 45) after the workshop, and at the conclusion of the 12-month trial (n = 10). The two education session facilitators were also interviewed about the intervention. RESULTS: The RCT showed no difference in sedentary time at 12 months between intervention and control arms. The lack of behaviour change appeared not to be attributed to the workshops, which were well led and very favourably received according to feedback. However, factors contributing to this lack of behaviour change include lack of perceived health risk from baseline measures feedback; the preference to adopt physically active behaviours rather than to sit less; certain barriers to sitting less; motivational drift after the 3-month follow-up measurements where participants had no contact for a further 9 months; and, for some, unreliability of the self-monitoring tool. CONCLUSIONS: The workshop was well led and well received by the attendees but future interventions need to consider more contact with participants, discuss any specific benefits around simply standing to reduce sitting time, address the barriers to sitting less, and provide a more user-friendly and reliable self-monitoring tool. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled trials ISRCTN08434554, MRC project 91409. Registered retrospectively on 22 February 2011.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5237565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52375652017-01-18 Reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) RCT Biddle, Stuart J. H. Edwardson, Charlotte L. Gorely, Trish Wilmot, Emma G. Yates, Thomas Nimmo, Myra A. Khunti, Kamlesh Davies, Melanie J. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Reducing sedentary behaviour may have important health implications. This study evaluated the potential enablers and barriers for outcomes of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate a pragmatic education based intervention designed to reduce sedentary (sitting) behaviour in young adults at high risk of type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Data were collected from participants in the intervention group immediately after an educational workshop addressing sedentary time and diabetes risk (n = 71), through phone interviews 6 weeks (n = 45) after the workshop, and at the conclusion of the 12-month trial (n = 10). The two education session facilitators were also interviewed about the intervention. RESULTS: The RCT showed no difference in sedentary time at 12 months between intervention and control arms. The lack of behaviour change appeared not to be attributed to the workshops, which were well led and very favourably received according to feedback. However, factors contributing to this lack of behaviour change include lack of perceived health risk from baseline measures feedback; the preference to adopt physically active behaviours rather than to sit less; certain barriers to sitting less; motivational drift after the 3-month follow-up measurements where participants had no contact for a further 9 months; and, for some, unreliability of the self-monitoring tool. CONCLUSIONS: The workshop was well led and well received by the attendees but future interventions need to consider more contact with participants, discuss any specific benefits around simply standing to reduce sitting time, address the barriers to sitting less, and provide a more user-friendly and reliable self-monitoring tool. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled trials ISRCTN08434554, MRC project 91409. Registered retrospectively on 22 February 2011. BioMed Central 2017-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5237565/ /pubmed/28088243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3941-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Biddle, Stuart J. H.
Edwardson, Charlotte L.
Gorely, Trish
Wilmot, Emma G.
Yates, Thomas
Nimmo, Myra A.
Khunti, Kamlesh
Davies, Melanie J.
Reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) RCT
title Reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) RCT
title_full Reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) RCT
title_fullStr Reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) RCT
title_full_unstemmed Reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) RCT
title_short Reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) RCT
title_sort reducing sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: process evaluation of the stand (sedentary time and diabetes) rct
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5237565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28088243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3941-9
work_keys_str_mv AT biddlestuartjh reducingsedentarytimeinadultsatriskoftype2diabetesprocessevaluationofthestandsedentarytimeanddiabetesrct
AT edwardsoncharlottel reducingsedentarytimeinadultsatriskoftype2diabetesprocessevaluationofthestandsedentarytimeanddiabetesrct
AT gorelytrish reducingsedentarytimeinadultsatriskoftype2diabetesprocessevaluationofthestandsedentarytimeanddiabetesrct
AT wilmotemmag reducingsedentarytimeinadultsatriskoftype2diabetesprocessevaluationofthestandsedentarytimeanddiabetesrct
AT yatesthomas reducingsedentarytimeinadultsatriskoftype2diabetesprocessevaluationofthestandsedentarytimeanddiabetesrct
AT nimmomyraa reducingsedentarytimeinadultsatriskoftype2diabetesprocessevaluationofthestandsedentarytimeanddiabetesrct
AT khuntikamlesh reducingsedentarytimeinadultsatriskoftype2diabetesprocessevaluationofthestandsedentarytimeanddiabetesrct
AT daviesmelaniej reducingsedentarytimeinadultsatriskoftype2diabetesprocessevaluationofthestandsedentarytimeanddiabetesrct