Cargando…

Prevalence and molecular epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in Thailand

Little is known about Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in Asia generally, and specifically in Thailand. Given the high prevalence of inappropriate antibiotic usage in this region, CDI is likely to be common. This study investigated the prevalence and molecular epidemiology of CDI in Thailand. S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Putsathit, P., Maneerattanaporn, M., Piewngam, P., Kiratisin, P., Riley, T.V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5237757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28119780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2016.10.004
_version_ 1782495580610625536
author Putsathit, P.
Maneerattanaporn, M.
Piewngam, P.
Kiratisin, P.
Riley, T.V.
author_facet Putsathit, P.
Maneerattanaporn, M.
Piewngam, P.
Kiratisin, P.
Riley, T.V.
author_sort Putsathit, P.
collection PubMed
description Little is known about Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in Asia generally, and specifically in Thailand. Given the high prevalence of inappropriate antibiotic usage in this region, CDI is likely to be common. This study investigated the prevalence and molecular epidemiology of CDI in Thailand. Stool specimens collected from inpatients with diarrhoea at Siriraj hospital in Bangkok (n = 422) were cultured on ChromID Cdiff agar and any presumptive C. difficile colonies were identified, PCR ribotyped and toxin profiled. As part of the routine C. difficile testing at Siriraj Hospital, 370 specimens also underwent testing with the BD MAX Cdiff assay to detect the presence of tcdB. With direct culture, 105 different isolates of C. difficile were recovered from 23.7% (100/422) of the stool specimens. The prevalence of toxigenic and nontoxigenic isolates was 9.2% (39/422) and 15.6% (66/422), respectively. Of the toxigenic isolates, 69.2% (27/39) and 30.8% (12/39) were tcdA and tcdB positive (A(+)B(+)), and A(−)B(+), respectively; none contained binary toxin genes. The five most prevalent ribotypes (RTs) were 014/020 group (17/105), 010 (12/105), 017 (12/105), 039 (9/105) and 009 (6/105). Using toxigenic culture as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the BD MAX Cdiff assay were 68.6, 95.1, 63.2 and 96.1%, respectively. The high proportion of A(−)B(+), RT 017 strains emphasises the need for diagnostic tests that detect either both toxins or just tcdB. Continued surveillance that involves stool culturing will allow molecular tracking and assist in elucidating the epidemiology of CDI in Thailand.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5237757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52377572017-01-24 Prevalence and molecular epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in Thailand Putsathit, P. Maneerattanaporn, M. Piewngam, P. Kiratisin, P. Riley, T.V. New Microbes New Infect Original Article Little is known about Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in Asia generally, and specifically in Thailand. Given the high prevalence of inappropriate antibiotic usage in this region, CDI is likely to be common. This study investigated the prevalence and molecular epidemiology of CDI in Thailand. Stool specimens collected from inpatients with diarrhoea at Siriraj hospital in Bangkok (n = 422) were cultured on ChromID Cdiff agar and any presumptive C. difficile colonies were identified, PCR ribotyped and toxin profiled. As part of the routine C. difficile testing at Siriraj Hospital, 370 specimens also underwent testing with the BD MAX Cdiff assay to detect the presence of tcdB. With direct culture, 105 different isolates of C. difficile were recovered from 23.7% (100/422) of the stool specimens. The prevalence of toxigenic and nontoxigenic isolates was 9.2% (39/422) and 15.6% (66/422), respectively. Of the toxigenic isolates, 69.2% (27/39) and 30.8% (12/39) were tcdA and tcdB positive (A(+)B(+)), and A(−)B(+), respectively; none contained binary toxin genes. The five most prevalent ribotypes (RTs) were 014/020 group (17/105), 010 (12/105), 017 (12/105), 039 (9/105) and 009 (6/105). Using toxigenic culture as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the BD MAX Cdiff assay were 68.6, 95.1, 63.2 and 96.1%, respectively. The high proportion of A(−)B(+), RT 017 strains emphasises the need for diagnostic tests that detect either both toxins or just tcdB. Continued surveillance that involves stool culturing will allow molecular tracking and assist in elucidating the epidemiology of CDI in Thailand. Elsevier 2016-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5237757/ /pubmed/28119780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2016.10.004 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Putsathit, P.
Maneerattanaporn, M.
Piewngam, P.
Kiratisin, P.
Riley, T.V.
Prevalence and molecular epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in Thailand
title Prevalence and molecular epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in Thailand
title_full Prevalence and molecular epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in Thailand
title_fullStr Prevalence and molecular epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and molecular epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in Thailand
title_short Prevalence and molecular epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in Thailand
title_sort prevalence and molecular epidemiology of clostridium difficile infection in thailand
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5237757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28119780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2016.10.004
work_keys_str_mv AT putsathitp prevalenceandmolecularepidemiologyofclostridiumdifficileinfectioninthailand
AT maneerattanapornm prevalenceandmolecularepidemiologyofclostridiumdifficileinfectioninthailand
AT piewngamp prevalenceandmolecularepidemiologyofclostridiumdifficileinfectioninthailand
AT kiratisinp prevalenceandmolecularepidemiologyofclostridiumdifficileinfectioninthailand
AT rileytv prevalenceandmolecularepidemiologyofclostridiumdifficileinfectioninthailand