Cargando…

Port-site incisional hernia – A case series of 54 patients

BACKGROUND: The increased use of laparoscopy has resulted in certain complications specifically associated with the laparoscopic approach, such as port-site incisional hernia (PIH). Until today, it is not finally clarified if port-site closure should be performed by fascia suture or not. Furthermore...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lambertz, A., Stüben, B.O., Bock, B., Eickhoff, R., Kroh, A., Klink, C.D., Neumann, U.P., Krones, C.J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5237772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28119777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.01.001
_version_ 1782495583974457344
author Lambertz, A.
Stüben, B.O.
Bock, B.
Eickhoff, R.
Kroh, A.
Klink, C.D.
Neumann, U.P.
Krones, C.J.
author_facet Lambertz, A.
Stüben, B.O.
Bock, B.
Eickhoff, R.
Kroh, A.
Klink, C.D.
Neumann, U.P.
Krones, C.J.
author_sort Lambertz, A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The increased use of laparoscopy has resulted in certain complications specifically associated with the laparoscopic approach, such as port-site incisional hernia (PIH). Until today, it is not finally clarified if port-site closure should be performed by fascia suture or not. Furthermore, the optimal treatment strategy in PIH (suture vs. mesh) is still widely unclear. The aim of this study was to present our experience with PIH in two independent departments and to derive possible treatment strategies from these results. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2013, 54 patients were operated due to port-site incisional hernia in two surgical centres. Their data were collected and retrospectively analyzed depending on surgical technique of port-site hernia repair (Mesh repair group, n = 13 vs. Suture only group, n = 41). RESULTS: Port site incisional hernia occurred in 96% (52 patients) after the use of trocars with 10 mm or larger diameter. Patients treated with mesh repair had significantly higher body mass index (BMI) (32 ± 9 vs. 27 ± 4; p = 0.023) and significantly higher rates of cardiac diseases (77% vs. 39%; p = 0.026) than patients in the suture only group. Mean fascial defect size was significantly larger in the Mesh repair group than in the Suture only group (31 ± 24 mm vs. 24 ± 32 mm; p = 0.007) and mean time of operation was significantly longer in patients operated with mesh repair (83 ± 47 min vs. 40 ± 28 min; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in mean hospital stay (3 ± 4 days; p = 0.057) and hernia recurrence rates (9%; p = 0.653) between study groups. Mean time of follow up was 32 ± 35 months. CONCLUSIONS: In Port sites of 10 mm and larger diameter fascia should be closed by suture, whereas the risk of hernia development in 5 mm trocar placements seems to be a rare complication. Port-site incisional hernia should be treated by suture or mesh repair depending on fascial defect size and the patients' risk factors regarding preexisting deseases and body mass index.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5237772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52377722017-01-24 Port-site incisional hernia – A case series of 54 patients Lambertz, A. Stüben, B.O. Bock, B. Eickhoff, R. Kroh, A. Klink, C.D. Neumann, U.P. Krones, C.J. Ann Med Surg (Lond) Original Research BACKGROUND: The increased use of laparoscopy has resulted in certain complications specifically associated with the laparoscopic approach, such as port-site incisional hernia (PIH). Until today, it is not finally clarified if port-site closure should be performed by fascia suture or not. Furthermore, the optimal treatment strategy in PIH (suture vs. mesh) is still widely unclear. The aim of this study was to present our experience with PIH in two independent departments and to derive possible treatment strategies from these results. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2013, 54 patients were operated due to port-site incisional hernia in two surgical centres. Their data were collected and retrospectively analyzed depending on surgical technique of port-site hernia repair (Mesh repair group, n = 13 vs. Suture only group, n = 41). RESULTS: Port site incisional hernia occurred in 96% (52 patients) after the use of trocars with 10 mm or larger diameter. Patients treated with mesh repair had significantly higher body mass index (BMI) (32 ± 9 vs. 27 ± 4; p = 0.023) and significantly higher rates of cardiac diseases (77% vs. 39%; p = 0.026) than patients in the suture only group. Mean fascial defect size was significantly larger in the Mesh repair group than in the Suture only group (31 ± 24 mm vs. 24 ± 32 mm; p = 0.007) and mean time of operation was significantly longer in patients operated with mesh repair (83 ± 47 min vs. 40 ± 28 min; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in mean hospital stay (3 ± 4 days; p = 0.057) and hernia recurrence rates (9%; p = 0.653) between study groups. Mean time of follow up was 32 ± 35 months. CONCLUSIONS: In Port sites of 10 mm and larger diameter fascia should be closed by suture, whereas the risk of hernia development in 5 mm trocar placements seems to be a rare complication. Port-site incisional hernia should be treated by suture or mesh repair depending on fascial defect size and the patients' risk factors regarding preexisting deseases and body mass index. Elsevier 2017-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5237772/ /pubmed/28119777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.01.001 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Lambertz, A.
Stüben, B.O.
Bock, B.
Eickhoff, R.
Kroh, A.
Klink, C.D.
Neumann, U.P.
Krones, C.J.
Port-site incisional hernia – A case series of 54 patients
title Port-site incisional hernia – A case series of 54 patients
title_full Port-site incisional hernia – A case series of 54 patients
title_fullStr Port-site incisional hernia – A case series of 54 patients
title_full_unstemmed Port-site incisional hernia – A case series of 54 patients
title_short Port-site incisional hernia – A case series of 54 patients
title_sort port-site incisional hernia – a case series of 54 patients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5237772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28119777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.01.001
work_keys_str_mv AT lambertza portsiteincisionalherniaacaseseriesof54patients
AT stubenbo portsiteincisionalherniaacaseseriesof54patients
AT bockb portsiteincisionalherniaacaseseriesof54patients
AT eickhoffr portsiteincisionalherniaacaseseriesof54patients
AT kroha portsiteincisionalherniaacaseseriesof54patients
AT klinkcd portsiteincisionalherniaacaseseriesof54patients
AT neumannup portsiteincisionalherniaacaseseriesof54patients
AT kronescj portsiteincisionalherniaacaseseriesof54patients