Cargando…

Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical practice

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to profile patients who undergo defecography, by age and gender, as well as to describe the main imaging and diagnostic findings in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, descriptive study of 39 patients, conducted between January...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gonçalves, Amanda Nogueira de Sá, Sala, Marco Aurélio Sousa, Bruno, Rodrigo Ciotola, Xavier, José Alberto Cunha, Indiani, João Mauricio Canavezi, Martin, Marcelo Fontalvo, Bruno, Paulo Maurício Chagas, Nacif, Marcelo Souto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5238412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28100932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0108
_version_ 1782495701256634368
author Gonçalves, Amanda Nogueira de Sá
Sala, Marco Aurélio Sousa
Bruno, Rodrigo Ciotola
Xavier, José Alberto Cunha
Indiani, João Mauricio Canavezi
Martin, Marcelo Fontalvo
Bruno, Paulo Maurício Chagas
Nacif, Marcelo Souto
author_facet Gonçalves, Amanda Nogueira de Sá
Sala, Marco Aurélio Sousa
Bruno, Rodrigo Ciotola
Xavier, José Alberto Cunha
Indiani, João Mauricio Canavezi
Martin, Marcelo Fontalvo
Bruno, Paulo Maurício Chagas
Nacif, Marcelo Souto
author_sort Gonçalves, Amanda Nogueira de Sá
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to profile patients who undergo defecography, by age and gender, as well as to describe the main imaging and diagnostic findings in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, descriptive study of 39 patients, conducted between January 2012 and February 2014. The patients were evaluated in terms of age, gender, and diagnosis. They were stratified by age, and continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. All possible quantitative defecography variables were evaluated, including rectal evacuation, perineal descent, and measures of the anal canal. RESULTS: The majority (95%) of the patients were female. Patient ages ranged from 18 to 82 years (mean age, 52 ± 13 years): 10 patients were under 40 years of age; 18 were between 40 and 60 years of age; and 11 were over 60 years of age. All 39 of the patients evaluated had abnormal radiological findings. The most prevalent diagnoses were rectocele (in 77%) and enterocele (in 38%). Less prevalent diagnoses were vaginal prolapse, uterine prolapse, and Meckel's diverticulum (in 2%, for all). CONCLUSION: Although defecography is performed more often in women, both genders can benefit from the test. Defecography can be performed in order to detect complex disorders such as uterine and rectal prolapse, as well as to detect basic clinical conditions such as rectocele or enterocele.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5238412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52384122017-01-18 Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical practice Gonçalves, Amanda Nogueira de Sá Sala, Marco Aurélio Sousa Bruno, Rodrigo Ciotola Xavier, José Alberto Cunha Indiani, João Mauricio Canavezi Martin, Marcelo Fontalvo Bruno, Paulo Maurício Chagas Nacif, Marcelo Souto Radiol Bras Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to profile patients who undergo defecography, by age and gender, as well as to describe the main imaging and diagnostic findings in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, descriptive study of 39 patients, conducted between January 2012 and February 2014. The patients were evaluated in terms of age, gender, and diagnosis. They were stratified by age, and continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. All possible quantitative defecography variables were evaluated, including rectal evacuation, perineal descent, and measures of the anal canal. RESULTS: The majority (95%) of the patients were female. Patient ages ranged from 18 to 82 years (mean age, 52 ± 13 years): 10 patients were under 40 years of age; 18 were between 40 and 60 years of age; and 11 were over 60 years of age. All 39 of the patients evaluated had abnormal radiological findings. The most prevalent diagnoses were rectocele (in 77%) and enterocele (in 38%). Less prevalent diagnoses were vaginal prolapse, uterine prolapse, and Meckel's diverticulum (in 2%, for all). CONCLUSION: Although defecography is performed more often in women, both genders can benefit from the test. Defecography can be performed in order to detect complex disorders such as uterine and rectal prolapse, as well as to detect basic clinical conditions such as rectocele or enterocele. Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5238412/ /pubmed/28100932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0108 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Gonçalves, Amanda Nogueira de Sá
Sala, Marco Aurélio Sousa
Bruno, Rodrigo Ciotola
Xavier, José Alberto Cunha
Indiani, João Mauricio Canavezi
Martin, Marcelo Fontalvo
Bruno, Paulo Maurício Chagas
Nacif, Marcelo Souto
Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical practice
title Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical practice
title_full Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical practice
title_fullStr Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical practice
title_short Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical practice
title_sort defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical practice
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5238412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28100932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0108
work_keys_str_mv AT goncalvesamandanogueiradesa defecographybydigitalradiographyexperienceinclinicalpractice
AT salamarcoaureliosousa defecographybydigitalradiographyexperienceinclinicalpractice
AT brunorodrigociotola defecographybydigitalradiographyexperienceinclinicalpractice
AT xavierjosealbertocunha defecographybydigitalradiographyexperienceinclinicalpractice
AT indianijoaomauriciocanavezi defecographybydigitalradiographyexperienceinclinicalpractice
AT martinmarcelofontalvo defecographybydigitalradiographyexperienceinclinicalpractice
AT brunopaulomauriciochagas defecographybydigitalradiographyexperienceinclinicalpractice
AT nacifmarcelosouto defecographybydigitalradiographyexperienceinclinicalpractice