Cargando…
Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical practice
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to profile patients who undergo defecography, by age and gender, as well as to describe the main imaging and diagnostic findings in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, descriptive study of 39 patients, conducted between January...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por
Imagem
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5238412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28100932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0108 |
_version_ | 1782495701256634368 |
---|---|
author | Gonçalves, Amanda Nogueira de Sá Sala, Marco Aurélio Sousa Bruno, Rodrigo Ciotola Xavier, José Alberto Cunha Indiani, João Mauricio Canavezi Martin, Marcelo Fontalvo Bruno, Paulo Maurício Chagas Nacif, Marcelo Souto |
author_facet | Gonçalves, Amanda Nogueira de Sá Sala, Marco Aurélio Sousa Bruno, Rodrigo Ciotola Xavier, José Alberto Cunha Indiani, João Mauricio Canavezi Martin, Marcelo Fontalvo Bruno, Paulo Maurício Chagas Nacif, Marcelo Souto |
author_sort | Gonçalves, Amanda Nogueira de Sá |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to profile patients who undergo defecography, by age and gender, as well as to describe the main imaging and diagnostic findings in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, descriptive study of 39 patients, conducted between January 2012 and February 2014. The patients were evaluated in terms of age, gender, and diagnosis. They were stratified by age, and continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. All possible quantitative defecography variables were evaluated, including rectal evacuation, perineal descent, and measures of the anal canal. RESULTS: The majority (95%) of the patients were female. Patient ages ranged from 18 to 82 years (mean age, 52 ± 13 years): 10 patients were under 40 years of age; 18 were between 40 and 60 years of age; and 11 were over 60 years of age. All 39 of the patients evaluated had abnormal radiological findings. The most prevalent diagnoses were rectocele (in 77%) and enterocele (in 38%). Less prevalent diagnoses were vaginal prolapse, uterine prolapse, and Meckel's diverticulum (in 2%, for all). CONCLUSION: Although defecography is performed more often in women, both genders can benefit from the test. Defecography can be performed in order to detect complex disorders such as uterine and rectal prolapse, as well as to detect basic clinical conditions such as rectocele or enterocele. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5238412 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por
Imagem |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52384122017-01-18 Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical practice Gonçalves, Amanda Nogueira de Sá Sala, Marco Aurélio Sousa Bruno, Rodrigo Ciotola Xavier, José Alberto Cunha Indiani, João Mauricio Canavezi Martin, Marcelo Fontalvo Bruno, Paulo Maurício Chagas Nacif, Marcelo Souto Radiol Bras Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to profile patients who undergo defecography, by age and gender, as well as to describe the main imaging and diagnostic findings in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, descriptive study of 39 patients, conducted between January 2012 and February 2014. The patients were evaluated in terms of age, gender, and diagnosis. They were stratified by age, and continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. All possible quantitative defecography variables were evaluated, including rectal evacuation, perineal descent, and measures of the anal canal. RESULTS: The majority (95%) of the patients were female. Patient ages ranged from 18 to 82 years (mean age, 52 ± 13 years): 10 patients were under 40 years of age; 18 were between 40 and 60 years of age; and 11 were over 60 years of age. All 39 of the patients evaluated had abnormal radiological findings. The most prevalent diagnoses were rectocele (in 77%) and enterocele (in 38%). Less prevalent diagnoses were vaginal prolapse, uterine prolapse, and Meckel's diverticulum (in 2%, for all). CONCLUSION: Although defecography is performed more often in women, both genders can benefit from the test. Defecography can be performed in order to detect complex disorders such as uterine and rectal prolapse, as well as to detect basic clinical conditions such as rectocele or enterocele. Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5238412/ /pubmed/28100932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0108 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Gonçalves, Amanda Nogueira de Sá Sala, Marco Aurélio Sousa Bruno, Rodrigo Ciotola Xavier, José Alberto Cunha Indiani, João Mauricio Canavezi Martin, Marcelo Fontalvo Bruno, Paulo Maurício Chagas Nacif, Marcelo Souto Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical practice |
title | Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical
practice |
title_full | Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical
practice |
title_fullStr | Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical
practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical
practice |
title_short | Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical
practice |
title_sort | defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical
practice |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5238412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28100932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0108 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goncalvesamandanogueiradesa defecographybydigitalradiographyexperienceinclinicalpractice AT salamarcoaureliosousa defecographybydigitalradiographyexperienceinclinicalpractice AT brunorodrigociotola defecographybydigitalradiographyexperienceinclinicalpractice AT xavierjosealbertocunha defecographybydigitalradiographyexperienceinclinicalpractice AT indianijoaomauriciocanavezi defecographybydigitalradiographyexperienceinclinicalpractice AT martinmarcelofontalvo defecographybydigitalradiographyexperienceinclinicalpractice AT brunopaulomauriciochagas defecographybydigitalradiographyexperienceinclinicalpractice AT nacifmarcelosouto defecographybydigitalradiographyexperienceinclinicalpractice |