Cargando…

Effects of heart valve prostheses on phase contrast flow measurements in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance – a phantom study

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance is often used to evaluate patients after heart valve replacement. This study systematically analyses the influence of heart valve prostheses on phase contrast measurements in a phantom trial. METHODS: Two biological and one mechanical aortic valve prosth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richau, Johanna, Dieringer, Matthias A., Traber, Julius, von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, Florian, Greiser, Andreas, Schwenke, Carsten, Schulz-Menger, Jeanette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5238524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28088917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0319-1
_version_ 1782495718291800064
author Richau, Johanna
Dieringer, Matthias A.
Traber, Julius
von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, Florian
Greiser, Andreas
Schwenke, Carsten
Schulz-Menger, Jeanette
author_facet Richau, Johanna
Dieringer, Matthias A.
Traber, Julius
von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, Florian
Greiser, Andreas
Schwenke, Carsten
Schulz-Menger, Jeanette
author_sort Richau, Johanna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance is often used to evaluate patients after heart valve replacement. This study systematically analyses the influence of heart valve prostheses on phase contrast measurements in a phantom trial. METHODS: Two biological and one mechanical aortic valve prostheses were integrated in a flow phantom. B(0) maps and phase contrast measurements were acquired at a 1.5 T MR scanner using conventional gradient-echo sequences in predefined distances to the prostheses. Results were compared to measurements with a synthetic metal-free aortic valve. RESULTS: The flow results at the level of the prosthesis differed significantly from the reference flow acquired before the level of the prosthesis. The maximum flow miscalculation was 154 ml/s for one of the biological prostheses and 140 ml/s for the mechanical prosthesis. Measurements with the synthetic aortic valve did not show significant deviations. Flow values measured approximately 20 mm distal to the level of the prosthesis agreed with the reference flow for all tested all prostheses. CONCLUSIONS: The tested heart valve prostheses lead to a significant deviation of the measured flow rates compared to a reference. A distance of 20 mm was effective in our setting to avoid this influence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5238524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52385242017-01-18 Effects of heart valve prostheses on phase contrast flow measurements in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance – a phantom study Richau, Johanna Dieringer, Matthias A. Traber, Julius von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, Florian Greiser, Andreas Schwenke, Carsten Schulz-Menger, Jeanette J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance is often used to evaluate patients after heart valve replacement. This study systematically analyses the influence of heart valve prostheses on phase contrast measurements in a phantom trial. METHODS: Two biological and one mechanical aortic valve prostheses were integrated in a flow phantom. B(0) maps and phase contrast measurements were acquired at a 1.5 T MR scanner using conventional gradient-echo sequences in predefined distances to the prostheses. Results were compared to measurements with a synthetic metal-free aortic valve. RESULTS: The flow results at the level of the prosthesis differed significantly from the reference flow acquired before the level of the prosthesis. The maximum flow miscalculation was 154 ml/s for one of the biological prostheses and 140 ml/s for the mechanical prosthesis. Measurements with the synthetic aortic valve did not show significant deviations. Flow values measured approximately 20 mm distal to the level of the prosthesis agreed with the reference flow for all tested all prostheses. CONCLUSIONS: The tested heart valve prostheses lead to a significant deviation of the measured flow rates compared to a reference. A distance of 20 mm was effective in our setting to avoid this influence. BioMed Central 2017-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5238524/ /pubmed/28088917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0319-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Richau, Johanna
Dieringer, Matthias A.
Traber, Julius
von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, Florian
Greiser, Andreas
Schwenke, Carsten
Schulz-Menger, Jeanette
Effects of heart valve prostheses on phase contrast flow measurements in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance – a phantom study
title Effects of heart valve prostheses on phase contrast flow measurements in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance – a phantom study
title_full Effects of heart valve prostheses on phase contrast flow measurements in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance – a phantom study
title_fullStr Effects of heart valve prostheses on phase contrast flow measurements in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance – a phantom study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of heart valve prostheses on phase contrast flow measurements in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance – a phantom study
title_short Effects of heart valve prostheses on phase contrast flow measurements in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance – a phantom study
title_sort effects of heart valve prostheses on phase contrast flow measurements in cardiovascular magnetic resonance – a phantom study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5238524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28088917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0319-1
work_keys_str_mv AT richaujohanna effectsofheartvalveprosthesesonphasecontrastflowmeasurementsincardiovascularmagneticresonanceaphantomstudy
AT dieringermatthiasa effectsofheartvalveprosthesesonphasecontrastflowmeasurementsincardiovascularmagneticresonanceaphantomstudy
AT traberjulius effectsofheartvalveprosthesesonphasecontrastflowmeasurementsincardiovascularmagneticresonanceaphantomstudy
AT vonknobelsdorffbrenkenhoffflorian effectsofheartvalveprosthesesonphasecontrastflowmeasurementsincardiovascularmagneticresonanceaphantomstudy
AT greiserandreas effectsofheartvalveprosthesesonphasecontrastflowmeasurementsincardiovascularmagneticresonanceaphantomstudy
AT schwenkecarsten effectsofheartvalveprosthesesonphasecontrastflowmeasurementsincardiovascularmagneticresonanceaphantomstudy
AT schulzmengerjeanette effectsofheartvalveprosthesesonphasecontrastflowmeasurementsincardiovascularmagneticresonanceaphantomstudy