Cargando…
Effects of heart valve prostheses on phase contrast flow measurements in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance – a phantom study
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance is often used to evaluate patients after heart valve replacement. This study systematically analyses the influence of heart valve prostheses on phase contrast measurements in a phantom trial. METHODS: Two biological and one mechanical aortic valve prosth...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5238524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28088917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0319-1 |
_version_ | 1782495718291800064 |
---|---|
author | Richau, Johanna Dieringer, Matthias A. Traber, Julius von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, Florian Greiser, Andreas Schwenke, Carsten Schulz-Menger, Jeanette |
author_facet | Richau, Johanna Dieringer, Matthias A. Traber, Julius von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, Florian Greiser, Andreas Schwenke, Carsten Schulz-Menger, Jeanette |
author_sort | Richau, Johanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance is often used to evaluate patients after heart valve replacement. This study systematically analyses the influence of heart valve prostheses on phase contrast measurements in a phantom trial. METHODS: Two biological and one mechanical aortic valve prostheses were integrated in a flow phantom. B(0) maps and phase contrast measurements were acquired at a 1.5 T MR scanner using conventional gradient-echo sequences in predefined distances to the prostheses. Results were compared to measurements with a synthetic metal-free aortic valve. RESULTS: The flow results at the level of the prosthesis differed significantly from the reference flow acquired before the level of the prosthesis. The maximum flow miscalculation was 154 ml/s for one of the biological prostheses and 140 ml/s for the mechanical prosthesis. Measurements with the synthetic aortic valve did not show significant deviations. Flow values measured approximately 20 mm distal to the level of the prosthesis agreed with the reference flow for all tested all prostheses. CONCLUSIONS: The tested heart valve prostheses lead to a significant deviation of the measured flow rates compared to a reference. A distance of 20 mm was effective in our setting to avoid this influence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5238524 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52385242017-01-18 Effects of heart valve prostheses on phase contrast flow measurements in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance – a phantom study Richau, Johanna Dieringer, Matthias A. Traber, Julius von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, Florian Greiser, Andreas Schwenke, Carsten Schulz-Menger, Jeanette J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance is often used to evaluate patients after heart valve replacement. This study systematically analyses the influence of heart valve prostheses on phase contrast measurements in a phantom trial. METHODS: Two biological and one mechanical aortic valve prostheses were integrated in a flow phantom. B(0) maps and phase contrast measurements were acquired at a 1.5 T MR scanner using conventional gradient-echo sequences in predefined distances to the prostheses. Results were compared to measurements with a synthetic metal-free aortic valve. RESULTS: The flow results at the level of the prosthesis differed significantly from the reference flow acquired before the level of the prosthesis. The maximum flow miscalculation was 154 ml/s for one of the biological prostheses and 140 ml/s for the mechanical prosthesis. Measurements with the synthetic aortic valve did not show significant deviations. Flow values measured approximately 20 mm distal to the level of the prosthesis agreed with the reference flow for all tested all prostheses. CONCLUSIONS: The tested heart valve prostheses lead to a significant deviation of the measured flow rates compared to a reference. A distance of 20 mm was effective in our setting to avoid this influence. BioMed Central 2017-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5238524/ /pubmed/28088917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0319-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Richau, Johanna Dieringer, Matthias A. Traber, Julius von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, Florian Greiser, Andreas Schwenke, Carsten Schulz-Menger, Jeanette Effects of heart valve prostheses on phase contrast flow measurements in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance – a phantom study |
title | Effects of heart valve prostheses on phase contrast flow measurements in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance – a phantom study |
title_full | Effects of heart valve prostheses on phase contrast flow measurements in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance – a phantom study |
title_fullStr | Effects of heart valve prostheses on phase contrast flow measurements in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance – a phantom study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of heart valve prostheses on phase contrast flow measurements in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance – a phantom study |
title_short | Effects of heart valve prostheses on phase contrast flow measurements in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance – a phantom study |
title_sort | effects of heart valve prostheses on phase contrast flow measurements in cardiovascular magnetic resonance – a phantom study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5238524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28088917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0319-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT richaujohanna effectsofheartvalveprosthesesonphasecontrastflowmeasurementsincardiovascularmagneticresonanceaphantomstudy AT dieringermatthiasa effectsofheartvalveprosthesesonphasecontrastflowmeasurementsincardiovascularmagneticresonanceaphantomstudy AT traberjulius effectsofheartvalveprosthesesonphasecontrastflowmeasurementsincardiovascularmagneticresonanceaphantomstudy AT vonknobelsdorffbrenkenhoffflorian effectsofheartvalveprosthesesonphasecontrastflowmeasurementsincardiovascularmagneticresonanceaphantomstudy AT greiserandreas effectsofheartvalveprosthesesonphasecontrastflowmeasurementsincardiovascularmagneticresonanceaphantomstudy AT schwenkecarsten effectsofheartvalveprosthesesonphasecontrastflowmeasurementsincardiovascularmagneticresonanceaphantomstudy AT schulzmengerjeanette effectsofheartvalveprosthesesonphasecontrastflowmeasurementsincardiovascularmagneticresonanceaphantomstudy |