Cargando…

Superiority of lymph node ratio-based staging system for prognostic prediction in 2575 patients with gastric cancer: validation analysis in a large single center

This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of node ratio (Nr), the ratio of metastatic to retrieved lymph nodes, and to investigate whether a modified staging system based on Nr can improve prognostic ability for gastric cancer patients following gastrectomy. A total of 2572 patients w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Lin-Yong, Li, Chang-Chun, Jia, Lu-Yu, Chen, Xiao-Long, Zhang, Wei-Han, Chen, Xin-Zu, Yang, Kun, Liu, Kai, Wang, Yi-Gao, Xue, Lian, Zhang, Bo, Chen, Zhi-Xin, Chen, Jia-Ping, Zhou, Zong-Guang, Hu, Jian-Kun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5239459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27363014
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.9714
_version_ 1782495898295599104
author Zhao, Lin-Yong
Li, Chang-Chun
Jia, Lu-Yu
Chen, Xiao-Long
Zhang, Wei-Han
Chen, Xin-Zu
Yang, Kun
Liu, Kai
Wang, Yi-Gao
Xue, Lian
Zhang, Bo
Chen, Zhi-Xin
Chen, Jia-Ping
Zhou, Zong-Guang
Hu, Jian-Kun
author_facet Zhao, Lin-Yong
Li, Chang-Chun
Jia, Lu-Yu
Chen, Xiao-Long
Zhang, Wei-Han
Chen, Xin-Zu
Yang, Kun
Liu, Kai
Wang, Yi-Gao
Xue, Lian
Zhang, Bo
Chen, Zhi-Xin
Chen, Jia-Ping
Zhou, Zong-Guang
Hu, Jian-Kun
author_sort Zhao, Lin-Yong
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of node ratio (Nr), the ratio of metastatic to retrieved lymph nodes, and to investigate whether a modified staging system based on Nr can improve prognostic ability for gastric cancer patients following gastrectomy. A total of 2572 patients were randomly divided into training set and validation set, and the cutoff points for Nr were produced using X-tile. The relationships between Nr and other clinicopathologic factors were analyzed, while survival prognostic discriminatory ability and accuracy were compared among different staging systems by AIC and C-index in R program. Patients were categorized into four groups as follows: Nr0, Nr1: 0.00–0.15, Nr2: 0.15–0.40 and Nr3: > 0.40. Nr was significantly associated with clinicopathologic factors including macroscopic type, tumor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, tumor size, T stage, N stage and TNM stage. Besides, for all patients, Nr and TNrM staging system showed a smaller AIC and a larger C-index than that of N and TNM staging system, respectively. Moreover, in subgroup analysis for patients with retrieved lymph nodes < 15, Nr was demonstrated to have a smaller AIC and a larger C-index than N staging system. Furthermore, in validation analysis, Nr, categorized by our cutoff points, showed a larger C-index and a smaller AIC value than those produced in previous studies. Nr could be considered as a reliable prognostic factor, even in patients with insufficient (< 15) retrieved lymph nodes, and TNrM staging system may improve the prognostic discriminatory ability and accuracy for gastric cancer patients undergoing radical gastrectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5239459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52394592017-01-24 Superiority of lymph node ratio-based staging system for prognostic prediction in 2575 patients with gastric cancer: validation analysis in a large single center Zhao, Lin-Yong Li, Chang-Chun Jia, Lu-Yu Chen, Xiao-Long Zhang, Wei-Han Chen, Xin-Zu Yang, Kun Liu, Kai Wang, Yi-Gao Xue, Lian Zhang, Bo Chen, Zhi-Xin Chen, Jia-Ping Zhou, Zong-Guang Hu, Jian-Kun Oncotarget Research Paper This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of node ratio (Nr), the ratio of metastatic to retrieved lymph nodes, and to investigate whether a modified staging system based on Nr can improve prognostic ability for gastric cancer patients following gastrectomy. A total of 2572 patients were randomly divided into training set and validation set, and the cutoff points for Nr were produced using X-tile. The relationships between Nr and other clinicopathologic factors were analyzed, while survival prognostic discriminatory ability and accuracy were compared among different staging systems by AIC and C-index in R program. Patients were categorized into four groups as follows: Nr0, Nr1: 0.00–0.15, Nr2: 0.15–0.40 and Nr3: > 0.40. Nr was significantly associated with clinicopathologic factors including macroscopic type, tumor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, tumor size, T stage, N stage and TNM stage. Besides, for all patients, Nr and TNrM staging system showed a smaller AIC and a larger C-index than that of N and TNM staging system, respectively. Moreover, in subgroup analysis for patients with retrieved lymph nodes < 15, Nr was demonstrated to have a smaller AIC and a larger C-index than N staging system. Furthermore, in validation analysis, Nr, categorized by our cutoff points, showed a larger C-index and a smaller AIC value than those produced in previous studies. Nr could be considered as a reliable prognostic factor, even in patients with insufficient (< 15) retrieved lymph nodes, and TNrM staging system may improve the prognostic discriminatory ability and accuracy for gastric cancer patients undergoing radical gastrectomy. Impact Journals LLC 2016-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5239459/ /pubmed/27363014 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.9714 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Zhao et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Zhao, Lin-Yong
Li, Chang-Chun
Jia, Lu-Yu
Chen, Xiao-Long
Zhang, Wei-Han
Chen, Xin-Zu
Yang, Kun
Liu, Kai
Wang, Yi-Gao
Xue, Lian
Zhang, Bo
Chen, Zhi-Xin
Chen, Jia-Ping
Zhou, Zong-Guang
Hu, Jian-Kun
Superiority of lymph node ratio-based staging system for prognostic prediction in 2575 patients with gastric cancer: validation analysis in a large single center
title Superiority of lymph node ratio-based staging system for prognostic prediction in 2575 patients with gastric cancer: validation analysis in a large single center
title_full Superiority of lymph node ratio-based staging system for prognostic prediction in 2575 patients with gastric cancer: validation analysis in a large single center
title_fullStr Superiority of lymph node ratio-based staging system for prognostic prediction in 2575 patients with gastric cancer: validation analysis in a large single center
title_full_unstemmed Superiority of lymph node ratio-based staging system for prognostic prediction in 2575 patients with gastric cancer: validation analysis in a large single center
title_short Superiority of lymph node ratio-based staging system for prognostic prediction in 2575 patients with gastric cancer: validation analysis in a large single center
title_sort superiority of lymph node ratio-based staging system for prognostic prediction in 2575 patients with gastric cancer: validation analysis in a large single center
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5239459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27363014
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.9714
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaolinyong superiorityoflymphnoderatiobasedstagingsystemforprognosticpredictionin2575patientswithgastriccancervalidationanalysisinalargesinglecenter
AT lichangchun superiorityoflymphnoderatiobasedstagingsystemforprognosticpredictionin2575patientswithgastriccancervalidationanalysisinalargesinglecenter
AT jialuyu superiorityoflymphnoderatiobasedstagingsystemforprognosticpredictionin2575patientswithgastriccancervalidationanalysisinalargesinglecenter
AT chenxiaolong superiorityoflymphnoderatiobasedstagingsystemforprognosticpredictionin2575patientswithgastriccancervalidationanalysisinalargesinglecenter
AT zhangweihan superiorityoflymphnoderatiobasedstagingsystemforprognosticpredictionin2575patientswithgastriccancervalidationanalysisinalargesinglecenter
AT chenxinzu superiorityoflymphnoderatiobasedstagingsystemforprognosticpredictionin2575patientswithgastriccancervalidationanalysisinalargesinglecenter
AT yangkun superiorityoflymphnoderatiobasedstagingsystemforprognosticpredictionin2575patientswithgastriccancervalidationanalysisinalargesinglecenter
AT liukai superiorityoflymphnoderatiobasedstagingsystemforprognosticpredictionin2575patientswithgastriccancervalidationanalysisinalargesinglecenter
AT wangyigao superiorityoflymphnoderatiobasedstagingsystemforprognosticpredictionin2575patientswithgastriccancervalidationanalysisinalargesinglecenter
AT xuelian superiorityoflymphnoderatiobasedstagingsystemforprognosticpredictionin2575patientswithgastriccancervalidationanalysisinalargesinglecenter
AT zhangbo superiorityoflymphnoderatiobasedstagingsystemforprognosticpredictionin2575patientswithgastriccancervalidationanalysisinalargesinglecenter
AT chenzhixin superiorityoflymphnoderatiobasedstagingsystemforprognosticpredictionin2575patientswithgastriccancervalidationanalysisinalargesinglecenter
AT chenjiaping superiorityoflymphnoderatiobasedstagingsystemforprognosticpredictionin2575patientswithgastriccancervalidationanalysisinalargesinglecenter
AT zhouzongguang superiorityoflymphnoderatiobasedstagingsystemforprognosticpredictionin2575patientswithgastriccancervalidationanalysisinalargesinglecenter
AT hujiankun superiorityoflymphnoderatiobasedstagingsystemforprognosticpredictionin2575patientswithgastriccancervalidationanalysisinalargesinglecenter