Cargando…
Subtle Scientific Fallacies Undermine the Validity of Neuroendocrinological Research: Do Not Draw Premature Conclusions on the Role of Female Sex Hormones
Major scientific flaws such as reporting and publication biases are well documented, even though acknowledgment of their importance appears to be lacking in various psychological and medical fields. Subtle and less obvious biases including selective reviews of the literature and empirically unsuppor...
Autor principal: | Hengartner, Michael P. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5239782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28144217 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00003 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Scientific Fallacies
Publicado: (1884) -
Methodological Flaws, Conflicts of Interest, and Scientific Fallacies: Implications for the Evaluation of Antidepressants’ Efficacy and Harm
por: Hengartner, Michael P.
Publicado: (2017) -
Interregional differences undermine sperm trend conclusions.
por: Heinze, J
Publicado: (1998) -
Neuroendocrinology
Publicado: (1992) -
Psychology and the Scientific Fallacy
por: King, C. Daly
Publicado: (1946)