Cargando…

Development and evaluation of a secondary reference panel for BCR-ABL1 quantification on the International Scale

Molecular monitoring of chronic myeloid leukemia patients using robust BCR-ABL1 tests standardized to the International Scale (IS) is key to proper disease management, especially when treatment cessation is considered. Most laboratories currently use a time-consuming sample exchange process with ref...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cross, N C P, White, H E, Ernst, T, Welden, L, Dietz, C, Saglio, G, Mahon, F-X, Wong, C C, Zheng, D, Wong, S, Wang, S-S, Akiki, S, Albano, F, Andrikovics, H, Anwar, J, Balatzenko, G, Bendit, I, Beveridge, J, Boeckx, N, Cerveira, N, Cheng, S-M, Colomer, D, Czurda, S, Daraio, F, Dulucq, S, Eggen, L, El Housni, H, Gerrard, G, Gniot, M, Izzo, B, Jacquin, D, Janssen, J J W M, Jeromin, S, Jurcek, T, Kim, D-W, Machova-Polakova, K, Martinez-Lopez, J, McBean, M, Mesanovic, S, Mitterbauer-Hohendanner, G, Mobtaker, H, Mozziconacci, M-J, Pajič, T, Pallisgaard, N, Panagiotidis, P, Press, R D, Qin, Y-Z, Radich, J, Sacha, T, Touloumenidou, T, Waits, P, Wilkinson, E, Zadro, R, Müller, M C, Hochhaus, A, Branford, S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5240017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27109508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/leu.2016.90
_version_ 1782495991660806144
author Cross, N C P
White, H E
Ernst, T
Welden, L
Dietz, C
Saglio, G
Mahon, F-X
Wong, C C
Zheng, D
Wong, S
Wang, S-S
Akiki, S
Albano, F
Andrikovics, H
Anwar, J
Balatzenko, G
Bendit, I
Beveridge, J
Boeckx, N
Cerveira, N
Cheng, S-M
Colomer, D
Czurda, S
Daraio, F
Dulucq, S
Eggen, L
El Housni, H
Gerrard, G
Gniot, M
Izzo, B
Jacquin, D
Janssen, J J W M
Jeromin, S
Jurcek, T
Kim, D-W
Machova-Polakova, K
Martinez-Lopez, J
McBean, M
Mesanovic, S
Mitterbauer-Hohendanner, G
Mobtaker, H
Mozziconacci, M-J
Pajič, T
Pallisgaard, N
Panagiotidis, P
Press, R D
Qin, Y-Z
Radich, J
Sacha, T
Touloumenidou, T
Waits, P
Wilkinson, E
Zadro, R
Müller, M C
Hochhaus, A
Branford, S
author_facet Cross, N C P
White, H E
Ernst, T
Welden, L
Dietz, C
Saglio, G
Mahon, F-X
Wong, C C
Zheng, D
Wong, S
Wang, S-S
Akiki, S
Albano, F
Andrikovics, H
Anwar, J
Balatzenko, G
Bendit, I
Beveridge, J
Boeckx, N
Cerveira, N
Cheng, S-M
Colomer, D
Czurda, S
Daraio, F
Dulucq, S
Eggen, L
El Housni, H
Gerrard, G
Gniot, M
Izzo, B
Jacquin, D
Janssen, J J W M
Jeromin, S
Jurcek, T
Kim, D-W
Machova-Polakova, K
Martinez-Lopez, J
McBean, M
Mesanovic, S
Mitterbauer-Hohendanner, G
Mobtaker, H
Mozziconacci, M-J
Pajič, T
Pallisgaard, N
Panagiotidis, P
Press, R D
Qin, Y-Z
Radich, J
Sacha, T
Touloumenidou, T
Waits, P
Wilkinson, E
Zadro, R
Müller, M C
Hochhaus, A
Branford, S
author_sort Cross, N C P
collection PubMed
description Molecular monitoring of chronic myeloid leukemia patients using robust BCR-ABL1 tests standardized to the International Scale (IS) is key to proper disease management, especially when treatment cessation is considered. Most laboratories currently use a time-consuming sample exchange process with reference laboratories for IS calibration. A World Health Organization (WHO) BCR-ABL1 reference panel was developed (MR(1)–MR(4)), but access to the material is limited. In this study, we describe the development of the first cell-based secondary reference panel that is traceable to and faithfully replicates the WHO panel, with an additional MR(4.5) level. The secondary panel was calibrated to IS using digital PCR with ABL1, BCR and GUSB as reference genes and evaluated by 44 laboratories worldwide. Interestingly, we found that >40% of BCR-ABL1 assays showed signs of inadequate optimization such as poor linearity and suboptimal PCR efficiency. Nonetheless, when optimized sample inputs were used, >60% demonstrated satisfactory IS accuracy, precision and/or MR(4.5) sensitivity, and 58% obtained IS conversion factors from the secondary reference concordant with their current values. Correlation analysis indicated no significant alterations in %BCR-ABL1 results caused by different assay configurations. More assays achieved good precision and/or sensitivity than IS accuracy, indicating the need for better IS calibration mechanisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5240017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52400172017-01-19 Development and evaluation of a secondary reference panel for BCR-ABL1 quantification on the International Scale Cross, N C P White, H E Ernst, T Welden, L Dietz, C Saglio, G Mahon, F-X Wong, C C Zheng, D Wong, S Wang, S-S Akiki, S Albano, F Andrikovics, H Anwar, J Balatzenko, G Bendit, I Beveridge, J Boeckx, N Cerveira, N Cheng, S-M Colomer, D Czurda, S Daraio, F Dulucq, S Eggen, L El Housni, H Gerrard, G Gniot, M Izzo, B Jacquin, D Janssen, J J W M Jeromin, S Jurcek, T Kim, D-W Machova-Polakova, K Martinez-Lopez, J McBean, M Mesanovic, S Mitterbauer-Hohendanner, G Mobtaker, H Mozziconacci, M-J Pajič, T Pallisgaard, N Panagiotidis, P Press, R D Qin, Y-Z Radich, J Sacha, T Touloumenidou, T Waits, P Wilkinson, E Zadro, R Müller, M C Hochhaus, A Branford, S Leukemia Original Article Molecular monitoring of chronic myeloid leukemia patients using robust BCR-ABL1 tests standardized to the International Scale (IS) is key to proper disease management, especially when treatment cessation is considered. Most laboratories currently use a time-consuming sample exchange process with reference laboratories for IS calibration. A World Health Organization (WHO) BCR-ABL1 reference panel was developed (MR(1)–MR(4)), but access to the material is limited. In this study, we describe the development of the first cell-based secondary reference panel that is traceable to and faithfully replicates the WHO panel, with an additional MR(4.5) level. The secondary panel was calibrated to IS using digital PCR with ABL1, BCR and GUSB as reference genes and evaluated by 44 laboratories worldwide. Interestingly, we found that >40% of BCR-ABL1 assays showed signs of inadequate optimization such as poor linearity and suboptimal PCR efficiency. Nonetheless, when optimized sample inputs were used, >60% demonstrated satisfactory IS accuracy, precision and/or MR(4.5) sensitivity, and 58% obtained IS conversion factors from the secondary reference concordant with their current values. Correlation analysis indicated no significant alterations in %BCR-ABL1 results caused by different assay configurations. More assays achieved good precision and/or sensitivity than IS accuracy, indicating the need for better IS calibration mechanisms. Nature Publishing Group 2016-09 2016-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5240017/ /pubmed/27109508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/leu.2016.90 Text en Copyright © 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Cross, N C P
White, H E
Ernst, T
Welden, L
Dietz, C
Saglio, G
Mahon, F-X
Wong, C C
Zheng, D
Wong, S
Wang, S-S
Akiki, S
Albano, F
Andrikovics, H
Anwar, J
Balatzenko, G
Bendit, I
Beveridge, J
Boeckx, N
Cerveira, N
Cheng, S-M
Colomer, D
Czurda, S
Daraio, F
Dulucq, S
Eggen, L
El Housni, H
Gerrard, G
Gniot, M
Izzo, B
Jacquin, D
Janssen, J J W M
Jeromin, S
Jurcek, T
Kim, D-W
Machova-Polakova, K
Martinez-Lopez, J
McBean, M
Mesanovic, S
Mitterbauer-Hohendanner, G
Mobtaker, H
Mozziconacci, M-J
Pajič, T
Pallisgaard, N
Panagiotidis, P
Press, R D
Qin, Y-Z
Radich, J
Sacha, T
Touloumenidou, T
Waits, P
Wilkinson, E
Zadro, R
Müller, M C
Hochhaus, A
Branford, S
Development and evaluation of a secondary reference panel for BCR-ABL1 quantification on the International Scale
title Development and evaluation of a secondary reference panel for BCR-ABL1 quantification on the International Scale
title_full Development and evaluation of a secondary reference panel for BCR-ABL1 quantification on the International Scale
title_fullStr Development and evaluation of a secondary reference panel for BCR-ABL1 quantification on the International Scale
title_full_unstemmed Development and evaluation of a secondary reference panel for BCR-ABL1 quantification on the International Scale
title_short Development and evaluation of a secondary reference panel for BCR-ABL1 quantification on the International Scale
title_sort development and evaluation of a secondary reference panel for bcr-abl1 quantification on the international scale
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5240017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27109508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/leu.2016.90
work_keys_str_mv AT crossncp developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT whitehe developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT ernstt developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT weldenl developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT dietzc developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT sagliog developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT mahonfx developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT wongcc developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT zhengd developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT wongs developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT wangss developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT akikis developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT albanof developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT andrikovicsh developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT anwarj developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT balatzenkog developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT benditi developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT beveridgej developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT boeckxn developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT cerveiran developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT chengsm developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT colomerd developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT czurdas developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT daraiof developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT dulucqs developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT eggenl developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT elhousnih developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT gerrardg developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT gniotm developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT izzob developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT jacquind developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT janssenjjwm developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT jeromins developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT jurcekt developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT kimdw developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT machovapolakovak developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT martinezlopezj developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT mcbeanm developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT mesanovics developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT mitterbauerhohendannerg developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT mobtakerh developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT mozziconaccimj developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT pajict developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT pallisgaardn developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT panagiotidisp developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT pressrd developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT qinyz developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT radichj developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT sachat developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT touloumenidout developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT waitsp developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT wilkinsone developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT zadror developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT mullermc developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT hochhausa developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale
AT branfords developmentandevaluationofasecondaryreferencepanelforbcrabl1quantificationontheinternationalscale